Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Study of Telotristat Etiprate (LX1606) in Participants With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome

26 février 2019 mis à jour par: Lexicon Pharmaceuticals

A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Serial Ascending-Dose, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of LX1606 in Subjects With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of orally administered telotristat etiprate (LX1606) in participants with symptomatic carcinoid syndrome.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

15

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Bad Berka, Allemagne
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • Berlin, Allemagne
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • Halle, Allemagne
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • Lubeck, Allemagne
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • Marburg, Allemagne
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • Munich, Allemagne
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • Basingstoke, Royaume-Uni
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • Cambridge, Royaume-Uni
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • London, Royaume-Uni
        • Lexicon Investigational Site
      • Manchester, Royaume-Uni
        • Lexicon Investigational Site

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females, aged 18 and older
  • Biopsy-proven metastatic carcinoid tumor of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with disease extent confirmed by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or radionuclide imaging
  • Symptomatic carcinoid syndrome (≥4 bowel movements per day)
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 12 high-volume, watery bowel movements per day
  • Sponsor-unacceptable clinical laboratory values for hematology and liver function tests at screening
  • Karnofsky status ≤70% - unable to care for self
  • Surgery within 60 days prior to screening
  • A history of short bowel syndrome
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
  • History of substance or alcohol abuse within 2 years prior to screening
  • Administration of any investigational drug within 30 days of screening or any therapeutic protein or antibody within 90 days of screening

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Telotristat etiprate - Core Phase
Following a 2-week Run-In Period, participants received telotristat etiprate capsules at a starting dose of 150 mg, orally three times daily (TID) for 14 days in the Core Phase. Dose escalations (250 mg, 350 mg, 500 mg) occurred serially every 14 days, up to a maximum dosage of telotristat etiprate 500 mg TID, as guided by specific clinical criteria for dose escalation. Upon completion of 12 weeks of treatment, participants were eligible to receive telotristat etiprate in the optional Open-label Extension Period.
Telotristat etiprate capsules orally three times daily.
Autres noms:
  • LX1606 Hippurate
Expérimental: Telotristat etiprate - Extension Period
Participants received telotristat etiprate at their highest tolerated dose (250 mg or 500 mg), orally, TID for 124 weeks in the Open-label Extension Period. If neither dose was tolerated participants were discontinued from the study and completed the 2-week Follow-up Visit.
Telotristat etiprate capsules orally three times daily.
Autres noms:
  • LX1606 Hippurate

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Core Phase
Délai: Baseline up to Week 12 in the Core Phase
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1.
Baseline up to Week 12 in the Core Phase
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Extension Period
Délai: Up to 124 Weeks in the Extension Period
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1.
Up to 124 Weeks in the Extension Period

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change From Baseline in Number of Bowel Movements (BMs)
Délai: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Participants recorded the number of bowel movements in a daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between mean numbers of BMs of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Stool Form/Consistency
Délai: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Participants assessed stool form/consistency in a daily diary using a 6-point scale (0-none, 1-hard, 2-firm, 3-soft, 4-loose, 5-watery). The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between a mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score and 5 indicates the worst score. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With Sensation of Urgency to Defecate
Délai: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Participants assessed the urgency to defecate using a daily diary response to the following question, "Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today?". The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score (percentage of days) of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Sensation/Severity of Nausea Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Délai: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Sensation/severity of nausea was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of nausea experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Number of Participants With an Improvement in Global Assessment of Symptoms Associated With Carcinoid Syndrome
Délai: Core Phase: Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Week 24
Participants assessed their symptoms using a weekly subjective response to the following question, "In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your carcinoid syndrome bowel complaints such as diarrhea, urgent need to have a bowel movement, abdominal pain, or discomfort?". The values for improvement in global assessment of symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome in the Core Phase were averaged from Weeks 9 to 12.
Core Phase: Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Week 24
Change From Baseline in Daily Severity of Abdominal Pain or Discomfort Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Délai: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
The severity of abdominal pain was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of abdominal pain or experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicate the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Daily Number of Cutaneous Flushing Episodes
Délai: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Participants recorded the number of daily cutaneous flushing episodes experienced in the daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean numbers of cutaneous flushing episodes of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Number of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Symptom Reduction in the Core Phase
Délai: Baseline to Week 12
Clinically meaningful symptom reduction was defined as either: a) an average of < 4 bowel movements per day over 15 consecutive days, b) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of bowel movements, c) a positive response to the question regarding adequate relief, or d) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of daily flushing episodes.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Urinary 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (HIAA) Levels
Délai: Core Phase: Baseline to Week 12; Extension Period: Baseline to Weeks 20-21
Urinary 5-HIAA (u5-HIAA) is a standard test used in clinical practice to assess the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) activity and is collected as a 24-hour urine specimen. The change from baseline value for the Extension Period was calculated as the difference between mean change in 5-HIAA of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 20 to 21) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
Core Phase: Baseline to Week 12; Extension Period: Baseline to Weeks 20-21

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Pablo LaPuerta, MD, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

15 juin 2010

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

12 février 2014

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

12 février 2014

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

12 avril 2010

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

13 avril 2010

Première publication (Estimation)

15 avril 2010

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

15 mars 2019

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 février 2019

Dernière vérification

1 février 2019

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner