Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease In The United Kingdom
25 mars 2014 mis à jour par: Pfizer
A Study To Describe The Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease At King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London
The purpose of this study is to describe the real world effectiveness of anidulafungin in clinical practice in a large Liver Unit in the United Kingdom.
Aperçu de l'étude
Description détaillée
All subjects that have been treated with Anidulafungin according to its licence during the period of July 2009 and September 2010 will be included.
Type d'étude
Observationnel
Inscription (Réel)
50
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
London, Royaume-Uni, SE5 9RS
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans à 90 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Échantillon non probabiliste
Population étudiée
Subjects admitted with candidiasis infections to the Liver Unit at King's College Hospital (United Kingdom) who are prescribed anidulafungin.
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who have been prescribed anidulafungin between 1st July 2009 and 30th September 2010.
Patients admitted to specialist liver unit wards and the Liver Intensive Therapy Unit during this period
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who participated in any interventional clinical trial during this episode of sepsis.
Patients who received anidulafungin for infection prophylaxis
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Anidulafungin
|
A single 200 mg loading dose should be administered on Day 1, followed by 100 mg daily thereafter.
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Outcome
Délai: Day 28 post-treatment
|
Favorable outcome was defined as favorable clinical response and documented or presumed microbial eradication (two negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections or a successful clinical response without follow-up cultures for other infections).
Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.
|
Day 28 post-treatment
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Unfavorable Outcome
Délai: Day 28 post-treatment
|
Unfavorable outcome was defined as the need to change to another antifungal agent because of lack of clinical response or death due to the antifungal infection or microbiologic persistence of the fungus or superinfection with a new Candida, Aspergillus or other fungal strain occurring at least 3 days and up to 14 days of anidulafungin therapy, or a lack of follow up data about clinical and microbiologic responses at the end of anidulafungin therapy.
|
Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to All Causes
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Death due to all causes included death attributable to fungal infection, death unrelated to fungal infection and death due to multiple causes.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Death Attributable to Fungal Infection
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Death Unrelated to Fungal Infection
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response
Délai: Day 28 post-treatment
|
Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.
|
Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Lack of Clinical Response
Délai: Day 28 post-treatment
|
Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.
|
Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants Requiring Change or Additional Antifungal Therapy
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Oral Antifungal Started to Complete Therapy
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Documented Eradication of Infecting Species
Délai: Baseline
|
Documented microbial eradication was defined as 2 negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections.
|
Baseline
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Ultrasound Scan Results
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
An ultrasound scan was performed and the resultant scan was reviewed for the presence of the infection as per investigator's discretion.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Results
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
A CT scan was performed and the resultant scan was reviewed for the presence of the infection as per investigator's discretion.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at Initiation of Drug Therapy
Délai: Baseline
|
Percentage of participants with abnormal liver function results were based on 4 liver function variables- bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase.
Normal reference ranges of these variables are: plasma bilirubin: 3-17 micromoles/L or 2.5-10 mg/L for adults; aspartate transaminase: 6-34 International Units/Liter (IU/L) for females and 8-40 IU/L for males; alkaline phosphatase: 5-38 IU/L for females and 10-50 IU/L for males; gamma glutamyl transferase: 7-32 IU/L for females and 11-50 IU/L for males.
Upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
|
Baseline
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at End of Drug Therapy
Délai: Day 28 post-treatment
|
Percentage of participants with abnormal liver function results were based on 4 liver function variables- bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase.
Normal reference ranges of these variables are: plasma bilirubin: 3-17 micromoles/L or 2.5-10 mg/L for adults; aspartate transaminase: 6-34 IU/L for females and 8-40 IU/L for males; alkaline phosphatase: 5-38 IU/L for females and 10-50 IU/L for males; gamma glutamyl transferase: 7-32 IU/L for females and 11-50 IU/L for males.
|
Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Liver Function Test Results at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Percentage of participants with liver function test results at least twice the baseline value during period of drug therapy was calculated for the liver function variables, bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants Admitted to Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)
Délai: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Duration of Stay at Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Neutrophil Count Less Than 500 Per Cubic Millimeter (/mm^3) and Greater Than or Equal to 500 /mm^3
Délai: Baseline
|
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 and upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100, by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
|
Baseline
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Bacterial or Viral Infection
Délai: Baseline
|
Upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
|
Baseline
|
|
Percentage of Participants Prescribed With Systemic Antifungal Within 30 Days Before Study Start
Délai: Baseline
|
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
|
Baseline
|
|
Dose Changes for Immunosuppressant Drugs
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Probable or Proven Fungal Infection at the Initiation of Drug Therapy
Délai: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Documented Body Temperature Above 38.0 Degree Celsius or Below 36.0 Degree Celsius Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy
Délai: Baseline
|
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 and upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100, by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
|
Baseline
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure More Than 2 Standard Deviations Below the Mean for Age Recorded Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy
Délai: Baseline
|
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
|
Baseline
|
|
Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Microbiological Analysis
Délai: Baseline
|
Infection sites included blood, chest, urinary tract, intra-abdominal, bile duct, liver, kidney, mouth and esophagus.
|
Baseline
|
|
Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Ultrasound Scan and Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan
Délai: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Infecting Organisms by Species
Délai: Baseline up to Day 14 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 14 post-treatment
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Species
Délai: Baseline
|
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
|
Baseline
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Colonization Index
Délai: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Other Prior Fungal Infection by Species and Colonization Index
Délai: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation
Délai: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation
Délai: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Loading Dose
Délai: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received 100 mg Dose on Day 2
Délai: Day 2
|
Day 2
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Dose on Day 1 and 100 mg for All Subsequent Doses
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Other Dosing Patterns
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
The other dosing patterns for anidulafungin included any dosing pattern different from 200 mg loading dose on Day 1 followed by 100 mg doses subsequently starting from Day 2.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Duration of Anidulafungin Therapy
Délai: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
An AE resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a SAE: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
Percentage of Participants With One or More Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Different Types of Drug-related Serious Adverse Events
Délai: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
1 février 2011
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 mai 2011
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 mai 2011
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
13 septembre 2010
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
13 septembre 2010
Première publication (Estimation)
15 septembre 2010
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)
16 avril 2014
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
25 mars 2014
Dernière vérification
1 mars 2014
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- A8851028
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .