Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Comparative Safety Study of Two Vaginal Applicators With Tenofovir

10 juillet 2012 mis à jour par: PATH

Comparative Safety Study of Pre-Filled Plastic and User-Filled Paper Vaginal Applicators With Candidate Microbicide, Tenofovir

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of two vaginal applicators, delivering the candidate microbicide Tenofovir, on symptoms and signs of irritation of the external genitalia, cervix and vagina as seen on colposcopy after seven days of twice daily use.

The secondary objectives are to:

  1. Evaluate and compare the dosing accuracy and precision of the user-filled applicator and pre-filled applicator with the candidate microbicide, Tenofovir.
  2. Compare the acceptability of the user-filled applicator with the pre-filled applicator.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

25

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 50 ans (Adulte)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Femelle

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Age 18 to 50, inclusive
  • Pre-menopausal
  • In good health as reported by individual
  • Have regular menstrual cycles (24 to 35 days)
  • Low risk for sexually transmitted infections (only one sexual partner in the last three months)
  • Not pregnant or at risk of pregnancy (must either have had a tubal ligation, or currently be using a hormonal method of contraception)
  • Negative on a urine pregnancy test
  • Willing to abstain from sexual intercourse and masturbation during two 7-day periods when applicators are being used
  • Willing to abstain from use of vaginal products during course of study (including douching, use of vaginal applicators for medication, lubrication, sex toys, other)
  • Willing to follow procedural requirements of study
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent for study participation
  • Willing to provide investigator with phone number or address where she can be reached during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of hysterectomy
  • Pregnancy or within two months of last pregnancy outcome (delivery, spontaneous or induced abortion, medical or surgical management of ectopic pregnancy)
  • Post-menopausal
  • Breastfeeding
  • Use of an intra-uterine device (IUD), cervical caps or diaphragm for contraceptive purposes
  • Diagnosis or treatment for a sexually transmitted disease within the past 30 days;
  • More than one sexual partner in the last 3 months
  • Has had surgery on the external genitalia, vagina, or cervix within the past 3 months;
  • Current or past use of any anti-retroviral therapies including but not limited to systemic Tenofovir (Viread®)
  • Current or anticipated use of drugs on a daily basis that may reduce renal function (e.g. acyclovir or ibuprofen) or liver function (e.g. Tylenol)
  • HIV positive at time of screening
  • Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive at time of screening
  • Positive test results for Neisseria gonorrhea, Chlamydia trachomatis, or Trichomonas vaginalis at time of screening.
  • At baseline colposcopic exam (Visit 2), findings involving disruption of epithelium with disruption of blood vessels or deep disruption of epithelium alone. Any area of epithelium with bleeding will be considered deeply disrupted.
  • Any abnormal finding on colposcopic exams which in the opinion of the investigator, precludes participation in the study
  • At baseline exams, clinical symptoms or signs of vaginitis or vulvitis confirmed by a wet mount exam of the discharge. Note: If vaginitis or vulvitis is present at either baseline exam (visits 2 or 10), volunteer will be treated and rescheduled for new baseline exam one week after application of last treatment dose. If signs or symptoms are still present at the rescheduled baseline exam for Visit 2, the volunteer will not be enrolled into study. If signs or symptoms are still present at the rescheduled baseline exam for Visit 10, the volunteer will be discontinued from the study.
  • Serum chemistry (glucose, creatinine, bilirubin, AST [aspartate aminotransferase] and ALT [alanine transaminase]) not within normal expected levels according to the specifications of the local laboratory.
  • Hemoglobin, hematocrit and total white blood cell not within 15 % of lower and upper limit normal levels according to the specifications of the local laboratory.
  • Participation in any other research study in the 30 days prior to screening and/or plans to participate in any other research study during the entire study duration.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: User-Filled Applicator
Delivered using prefilled and user-filled applicator
Autres noms:
  • FPV
Autre: Prefilled applicator
Delivered using prefilled and user-filled applicator
Autres noms:
  • FPV

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Number of Colposcopic Findings (Baseline and After One Week of Product Use)
Délai: 7 days
Comparison of colposcopic findings between baseline visits and after one week of twice-daily application of Tenofovir 1% gel with either a user-filled or prefilled applicator
7 days

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Filled Volume
Délai: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
At each dose delivery visit, the applicator was weighed, prior to vaginal insertion. For the user-filled applicator, the participant handed the applicator to the investigator after filling with gel from the multidose tube. The applicator was then weighed and returned to the participant for insertion. For the prefilled applicator, the participant inserted the plunger into the barrel, and then handed the applicator to the investigator for weighing.
3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Filling Precision (5% Range)
Délai: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
A 5% range was calculated around the average filled volumes to determine how many applicators were filled within this range (+/-5% of average volume)
3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Filling Precision (10% Range)
Délai: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
A 10% range was calculated around the average filled volumes to determine how many applicators were filled within this range (+/-10% of average volume)
3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Filling Accuracy (% of Target Dose)
Délai: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
The target dose for Tenofovir gel in this study was 4.0ml, which is the volume of Tenofovir being used in current microbicide clinical trials. The filled volume for each applicator was compared with the intended target dose of 4.0ml.
3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Dosing Volume (Expressed Volume)
Délai: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
At each dose delivery visit, the applicator was weighed prior to vaginal insertion and after use. The volume of gel expressed was measured using the following data: weight of filled applicator, weight of emptied applicator, the average weight of an empty applicator, and gel density.
3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Dosing Precision, 5% (Expressed Volume)
Délai: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
A 5% range was calculated around the average expressed volume of 3.83ml to determine how many applicators delivered a dose within this range (+/-5% of average volume)
3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Dosing Precision, 10% (Expressed Volume)
Délai: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
A 10% range was calculated around the average expressed volume of 3.83ml to determine how many applicators delivered a dose within this range (+/-10% of average volume)
3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Dosing Accuracy (% of Target Dose Delivered)
Délai: 3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
The target dose for Tenofovir gel in this study was 4.0ml, which is the volume of Tenofovir being used in current microbicide clinical trials. The average dose delivered for each applicator was compared with the intended target dose of 4.0ml.
3 dose delivery measurements during 1 week of product use
Number of Participants Reporting Applicator Easy to Fill
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked to describe the process of filling the user-filled applicator.

Response categories included "easy", "moderately difficult", and "difficult".

Since "ease of filling" only applies to the user-filled applicator, this question was not applicable for the prefilled applicator.

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Respondents Reporting Confidence With Filling the User-filled Applicator
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked when using the user-filled applicator, how confident did they feel that they at inserted the correct amount of gel into the applicator.

Response categories included "very confident", "confident", and "not confident".

(Note: this question does not apply to the prefilled applicator.)

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Reasons Given by Participants for Knowing When the Applicator Was Filled Correctly
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked how did they know when the applicator was filled correctly (that is, with the right amount of gel). More than one answer was allowed.

Response categories included "plunger automatically stopped", "the 'FULL' line was reached", and "other".

Note: this question does not apply to the prefilled applicator.

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting Applicator Easy to Insert
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked to describe the insertion of the applicator into the vagina for each applicator (user-filled and prefilled).

Response categories included "easy", "moderately difficult", and "difficult".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That the Gel Was Easy to Dispense
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked to describe the dispensing of the gel into the vagina with each applicator (user-filled and prefilled).

Response categories included "easy", "moderately difficult", and "difficult".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting Applicator Preference (User-filled or Prefilled) Across a Variety of Factors
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked about their preference for either the user-filled or prefilled applicator with regard to several use factors as well as in relation to disposal, storage, and overall comfort and preference.

Response categories included "user-filled", "prefilled", and "same".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That Applicator Was Comfortable to Use
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked to describe the comfort of use for each applicator type(user-filled and prefilled).

Response categories included "comfortable", "neutral", and "uncomfortable".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting Suggestions Regarding Ease of Use or Comfort
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Participants were asked if they could suggest ways that would make each applicator easier or more comfortable to use. Response categories were "yes" and "no". If yes, participants were asked to describe how they would make the applicator easier and/or more comfortable to use.
Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That the Instructions for Use Were Helpful
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

For each applicator type, participants were asked if the instructions were helpful to you.

Response categories were "yes" and "no".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That Both Applicators Were Acceptable
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Participants were asked if both applicators were acceptable to them. Responses were either "yes" or "no".
Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That the Cost of the Applicator Would Influence Their Choice of Applicator
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked if the cost of the applicator would influence their choice of applicator.

Response categories were "yes", "no", and "maybe".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That They Would Use the User-filled Applicator in the Future if it Came With a Gel for HIV Prevention
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked if they would use the user-filled applicator in the future if it came with a gel that helped prevent HIV infection.

Response categories included "yes", "no", and "in some circumstances".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That They Would Not Want to Use the User-filled Applicator in the Future if it Came With a Gel for HIV Prevention
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked if there were any reasons that they would not want to use this user-filled applicator in the future if it came with a gel that helped prevent HIV infection.

Response categories included "yes", "no", and "in some circumstances".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)
Number of Participants Reporting That They Would Recommend the User-filled Applicator for HIV Prevention
Délai: Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Participants were asked if they would recommend the user-filled applicator to other women if it came with a gel that helped prevent HIV infection.

Response categories included "yes", "no", and "in some circumstances".

Final study visit (after completing both study arms)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Vivian Brache, Profamilia

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 janvier 2011

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juin 2011

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juin 2011

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

24 janvier 2011

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 janvier 2011

Première publication (Estimation)

26 janvier 2011

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

16 juillet 2012

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 juillet 2012

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2012

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner