Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Project A: Integrated Approaches to Improving the Health and Safety of Health Care Workers

6 mai 2015 mis à jour par: Glorian Sorensen, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)

While most of the research on integrated approaches of occupational health and safety and worksite health promotion to date has focused on manufacturing settings, employment is shifting to the service sector. Within this sector, health care employs over 12 million workers, and is the second fastest growing industry in the U.S. economy. In contrast to workers in other industries, rates of occupational injuries and illnesses among health care workers have increased over the past decade. The purpose of this study is to lay the foundation for integrated interventions in health care through examination of the associations of worker health outcomes and risks on and off the job with work policies and practices and to address the prevalent issues of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), particularly low back pain disability (LBPD), and health promotions through physical activity among patient care workers. The specific aims of this study are:

  1. To estimate the efficacy and determine the feasibility of an integrated intervention, addressing both health protection and health promotion in order to reduce MSD symptoms and improve health behaviors among healthcare workers. We will assess between-group differences in MSD symptoms, health behaviors, including physical activity, and a set of secondary outcomes, including unplanned absence, reported injuries, worker compensation claims and costs, turnover and retention, intention to leave the job, and work-role function. This study will explore the working hypothesis that: Workers employed at baseline in patient-care units receiving the intervention will report greater reductions in their MSD symptoms (primary outcome) and greater improvements in health behaviors, compared with workers employed at baseline in units assigned to the Usual Care control group.
  2. To determine the factors in the work environment which contribute over time to reductions in MSD symptoms and improvements in safe and healthy behaviors. (1) The work environment, work organization, and psychosocial factors, measured in our current study, will be associated with changes in workers' health behaviors and health outcomes between the assessments in the current and proposed studies; (2) Improvements in the work environment over time will be associated with improvements in workers' health behaviors and health outcomes. We will conduct multilevel modeling analysis to evaluate the simultaneous effects of worker-level and unit-level factors on MSD symptoms and safety and health behaviors.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Improving and protecting the health and well-being of healthcare workers requires addressing key risks in the work environment as well as promoting safe and healthy behaviors. Healthcare workers are at elevated risk for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) due to a range of job factors, including lifting and transferring patients; working long hours (often at night); and limited control over decisions on the job. Among these, nurses and nurses aides bear the largest burden of injury. Back injuries in particular constitute the greatest source of their disability. These risks are likely to increase in coming years due to the aging nursing workforce, increase in work demands, and labor shortages. Health behaviors, including physical activity, inadequate sleep, and dietary patterns associated with being overweight or obese, are also influenced by the work environment and psychosocial factors on the job, and are also associated with MSD risk. Traditional approaches to redressing these risks have focused separately on health protection, including efforts to reduce MSD risk, and health promotion aimed at improving health behaviors. Little research has systematically examined the dual and potentially synergistic effects of the work environment on risk of MSDs and worker health behaviors, and there is insufficient evidence to determine the most efficacious ways to ameliorate the combined effects of these health risks. Our long-term goal is to improve the overall health and well-being of healthcare workers by making available evidence-based worksite policies, programs, and practices that foster a healthy work environment, reduce potential hazardous job exposures, and promote safe and healthy behaviors. The proposed study is the next logical step in building this evidence base. Factors in the work environment, including high work demands, low social support, and long work hours, have been shown to increase risk of MSDs, as well as risk-related behaviors. Yet little research has systematically explored these cross-cutting pathways and their implications for improving the effectiveness of worksite interventions to address the broad spectrum of worker health outcomes.

The proposed research provides a novel approach to worksite interventions that integrate occupational safety and health and worksite health promotion, taking into account the shared factors in the work environment shaping both MSDs and health behaviors. Standard approaches to occupational health and safety and worksite health promotion are based on a parallel structure of separate silos functioning relatively independently in the worksite, each drawing from their own disciplines and training experiences within public health. Although these parallel efforts share the common mission of improving worker health, their strategies are based on different assumptions about and approaches to improving worker health outcomes. The proposed research integrates these parallel approaches. Although our prior research has rigorously tested the efficacy of this integrated intervention model in changing worker health behaviors, to our knowledge no prior research has examined the impact of this integrated model on health outcomes associated with work exposures - here, notably, on MSD symptoms.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

9500

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02115
        • Harvard School of Public Health

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult and pediatric in-patient care units at Massachusetts General Hospital that have ceiling lifts in place (n=42 units) are eligible for the intervention.
  • Patient care workers, including registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), patient care assistants (PCAs)/nursing assistants (NAs) and Nurse Leaders working in in-patient units for at least 20 hours per week (n= 9500).
  • Of those patient care workers, those working in adult and pediatric in-patient care units (n=90 units) are eligible to be randomly selected for surveys.

Exclusion criteria:

N/A

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: Contrôler
Aucune intervention
Expérimental: Intervention
Be Well Work Well

The intervention follows principles for integrated approaches to promoting and protecting worker health. It will occur on 4 inpatient units at Massachusetts General Hospital beginning in January 2013, and will continue for 1 year.

Overall intervention objectives:

  1. Motivate individual staff members to engage in targeted health and safety behavior changes;
  2. build awareness of ergonomic and safety hazards and of opportunities for healthy dietary choices and physical activity;
  3. facilitate unit-level norms supportive of breaks, safe patient handling, and targeted health and safety behaviors; and
  4. promote co-worker and supervisor support for targeted health and safety behaviors.
Autres noms:
  • OSH protection and health promotion program

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Pain
Délai: Baseline and 1 year
  • Musculoskeletal disorder pain
  • Self-report via survey
Baseline and 1 year
Physical Activity
Délai: Baseline and 1 year
Self-report via survey
Baseline and 1 year
Diet
Délai: Baseline and 1 year
Self-report via survey
Baseline and 1 year
Sleep
Délai: Baseline and 1 year
Self-report via survey
Baseline and 1 year

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Safe patient handling
Délai: Baseline and 1 year
Self-report via survey
Baseline and 1 year
Work role function/limitations
Délai: Baseline and 1 year
Self-report via survey
Baseline and 1 year
BMI/obesity
Délai: Baseline and 1 year
Self-report via survey
Baseline and 1 year

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Economic/systems outcomes
Délai: Baseline and 1 year
  • Unplanned absence
  • Reported injuries
  • Worker compensation
  • Turnover/retention
  • Healthcare utilization/costs

Self-report via survey

Baseline and 1 year

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Glorian Sorensen, PhD, MPH, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 avril 2012

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juin 2014

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juin 2014

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

19 mars 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 avril 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

29 avril 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

7 mai 2015

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

6 mai 2015

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2015

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • U19OH008861 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner