- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT02494518
Forced Aerobic Exercise for Stroke Rehabilitation
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Description détaillée
The goal of this study is to determine the potential for forced aerobic exercise to augment the recovery of motor function in individuals with stroke. Current approaches to stroke rehabilitation involve intensive, therapist-directed task practice that is both expensive and in some cases, ineffective in fostering functional neuromotor recovery. The identification of a safe, cost-effective approach, such as forced aerobic exercise, to augment the recovery of function achieved through task practice while simultaneously decreasing the cardiovascular risk factors prevalent in stroke survivors would be significant to rehabilitation and stroke communities.
Animal studies along with preliminary human data indicate a specific type of aerobic exercise (AE), forced aerobic exercise (FE), may be ideal in facilitating motor recovery associated with repetitive task practice (RTP). The hypothesis is that that deficits in afferent input and motor cortical output following stroke prevents patients from achieving and maintaining an exercise intensity that is sufficient for facilitating motor recovery; therefore, FE is needed to augment their voluntary efforts and achieve greater gains in recovery. In previous research, a safe lower extremity FE intervention was initially applied to individuals with Parkinson's disease and subsequently to individuals with stroke. Preliminary results indicate that those completing an 8-week FE intervention paired with an abbreviated session of RTP exhibited significantly greater improvement in Fugl-Meyer scores at end of treatment despite completing 40% fewer RTP repetitions, compared to those receiving voluntary-rate aerobic exercise (VE) and RTP and time-matched RTP only. Improvements in cardiovascular fitness and lower extremity motor function were also evident in both groups that engaged in aerobic exercise (FE and VE). Positive results from a preliminary trial indicate safety, feasibility, and initial efficacy of combining two modes of aerobic exercise training with RTP provide rationale for a systematic and larger scale trial to determine the precise role of aerobic exercise, forced and voluntary, in facilitating motor recovery following stroke.
For this study, 30 individuals with chronic stroke will be randomized into one of the following groups: FE = RTP, VE + RTP or patient education and RTP. All three groups will receive an identical dose of contact time over 8 weeks (3X per week). An intervention group receiving a 45-minute session of patient education paired with RTP will serve as the non-exercise control. Clinical and biomechanical outcomes measuring change in upper extremity motor function, lower extremity motor function, and cardiovascular fitness will provide the most complete picture, to date, on the potential neurologic effects of AE (forced and voluntary) on motor recovery and brain function in humans with stroke.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, États-Unis, 44195
- Cleveland Clinic
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to provide informed consent
- At least 6 months post diagnosis of single ischemic stroke, confirmed with neuroimaging
- Fugl-Meyer Motor Score 19-55 in involved upper extremity
- Approval from patient's physician
- Age between 18 and 85 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hospitalization for myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or heart surgery (CABG or valve replacement) within 3 months of study enrollment
- Serious cardiac arrhythmia
- Other serious heart and lung conditions (i.e.cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis, cardiac pacemaker, pulmonary embolus)
- Other medical or musculoskeletal contraindication to exercise
- Significant cognitive impairment (unable to follow 1-2 step commands) or major psychiatric disorder (major depression, generalized anxiety) that will cause difficulty in study participation
- Anti-spasticity injection (botox) in upper extremity within 3 months of study enrollment
- Pregnancy
- Unstable blood pressure at rest or with exercise
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Comparateur actif: Forced Exercise & Upper Extremity Repetitive Task Practice
Participants will perform the following:
|
|
|
Comparateur actif: Voluntary Exercise & Upper Extremity Repetitive Task Practice
Participants will perform the following:
|
|
|
Comparateur actif: Stroke Education & Upper Extremity Repetitive Task Practice
Participants will perform the following:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl Meyer Assessment
Délai: Change from baseline to midpoint (4 weeks into treatment), at end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Motor test to assess arm impairment.
The reported data is the change in total score.
Score range from 0-66 and higher scores represent less impairment.
|
Change from baseline to midpoint (4 weeks into treatment), at end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
|
Wolf Motor Function Test
Délai: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Motor test to assess arm function.
The reported data is the change in total Functional Ability Score.
Scores range from 0-75 and higher scores represent improved function.
|
Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
|
Stroke Impact Scale
Délai: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Quality of life questionnaire.
The reported data is the normalized Hand Function score.
Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better perceived hand function.
|
Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
|
Metabolic Stress Test
Délai: Change from baseline to follow up assessments at end of 8 week intervention
|
Cycling test to measure cardiovascular fitness.
The data reported is the change in VO2peak.
Higher scores indicate higher aerobic capacities.
|
Change from baseline to follow up assessments at end of 8 week intervention
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Action Research Arm Test
Délai: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Motor test to assess arm function.
The reported data is change in total score.
Scores range from 0-57, and higher scores indicate better function.
|
Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
|
Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression
Délai: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Depression questionnaire.
The reported data is change in total score.
Scores range from 0-60, and lower scores indicate decreased risk of depression.
|
Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
|
Processing Speed Test
Délai: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Matching letters and symbols to test cognition.
The reported data is change in total number correct.
|
Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
|
Nine Hole Peg Test
Délai: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Transferring pegs into a fitted hole to measure hand function.
The reported data is change in average time to complete.
|
Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test
Délai: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Distance walked in 6 minutes to measure cardiovascular fitness.
The reported data is change in total distance traveled.
|
Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Susan Linder, PT, DPT, NCS, The Cleveland Clinic
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Linder SM, Davidson S, Rosenfeldt A, Lee J, Koop MM, Bethoux F, Alberts JL. Forced and Voluntary Aerobic Cycling Interventions Improve Walking Capacity in Individuals With Chronic Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan;102(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
- Linder SM, Davidson S, Rosenfeldt A, Penko A, Lee J, Koop MM, Phelan D, Alberts JL. Predictors of Improved Aerobic Capacity in Individuals With Chronic Stroke Participating in Cycling Interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr;101(4):717-721. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.187. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
- Rosenfeldt AB, Linder SM, Davidson S, Clark C, Zimmerman NM, Lee JJ, Alberts JL. Combined Aerobic Exercise and Task Practice Improve Health-Related Quality of Life Poststroke: A Preliminary Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 May;100(5):923-930. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimation)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 12-402
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .