Limited English Proficiency Occupational Therapy Patients Receiving Interpreter Services Perception of Quality of Care
A systematic literature review from March through June 2014 supports the premise that limited English proficiency (LEP) persons face barriers and disparities to medical care that English-speaking persons do not face. Language barriers have a negative impact on health and health care, including lower health status, lower likelihood of having a primary care provider, lower rate of preventative care, higher use rate of diagnostic tests, higher rate of severe psychopathology diagnoses, and higher risk of drug complications . Additionally, LEP persons experience problems with effective communication with providers, inappropriate diagnoses and treatments, lower comprehension of medication instructions and adherence to regimens, fewer follow up visits, low quality care, poorer health outcomes, and low patient satisfaction.
Research has proven a relationship between LEP and health care outcomes, specifically a relationship between positive outcomes and use of professional interpreters. Not sharing a common language creates a barrier to providing safe, effective, client-centered Occupational Therapy (OT) and knowledge of outcome satisfaction for this population. Using trained interpreters would reduce the barriers created by language discordance.
This evidence-based project intends to measures the influence of interpreter service on LEP patients' perceived quality of care using a satisfaction survey. Gathered data will be used to consider development and implementation of practice guidelines for use of professional interpreter services for LEP patients receiving OT services at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush. Development and implementation of practice guidelines that include use of trained interpreters when providing OT services to LEP patients will facilitate a client-centered approach and improve quality of care for this population.
The project is also being implemented as part of a degree requirement for the Doctorate of Occupational Therapy Program at Chatham University.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
The sampling frame will consist of adults, age 18 or older, with limited English proficiency (LEP), with an upper extremity injury or disorder, that have been referred to occupational therapy (OT) at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush (MOR), require services that span four weeks or more, agree to use of interpreter services, agree to completing a paper and pencil survey at the end of four weeks, and agree to be interviewed after four weeks of occupational therapy services, following completion of the survey. LEP is determined by a preference to receive medical information in a non-English language. Sampling frame is four participants. The sampling frame will be purposive. As LEP individuals present for OT services they will be recruited for participation. Recruitment could happen simultaneously or in tandem.
The comparison group sampling frame will consist of adults, age 18 or older, proficient in English, with an upper extremity injury or disorder, that have been referred to OT at MOR, and require services that span four weeks or more. English proficiency is determined by use of English as preferred language. Sampling frame is four participants. For each LEP individual recruited, the following English-speaking individual will be asked to participate. When participants in each group are recruited, further recruitment will cease. The total sampling frame will be eight. Enlisting an English proficient individual following recruitment of an LEP individual ensures having equal participation in each group.
A paper and pencil survey will be administered in person at MOR after the initial occupational therapy visit and at the end of four weeks of OT services to the 4 Limited English proficient subjects and 4 English-speaking subjects, for 16 completed surveys. Completion will take place in a private room in the OT department. Subjects will self-select a 4 digit identification code that they will write in at the top of the survey. The sole purpose of the code is to match the pre-OT satisfaction survey with the post-OT satisfaction survey. No personal identification markers will be used on the surveys. Interviews will be conducted with each LEP individual following four weeks of OT services and after completion of the paper survey. No personal identification markers will be placed on the interview form. The interviews will be conducted in person at MOR, in a private room in the OT department. The primary investigator will present the open-ended questions with the assistance of Rush University Medical Center (RUMC) interpreter services. The documented data will be reviewed by the primary investigator for emerging themes that may provide insight and additional information.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be age 18 or older
- Must have a current prescription for occupational therapy (OT) that requires service for four weeks or more that span the six-week length of the project
- Agree to sign the project informed consent form
- Agree to complete the pre-OT satisfaction survey in its entirety at the conclusion of their OT initial evaluation and the post-4 weeks OT satisfaction survey at the end of four weeks of OT service
Additional inclusion criteria for limited English proficiency (LEP) group:
- Agree to use professional interpreter services
- Agree to an interview at the end of four weeks of OT service
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years of age
- Does not have a current prescription for occupational therapy (OT) that requires service for four weeks or more that span the six-week length of the project
- Refusal to sign the project informed consent form
- Refusal to complete the pre-OT satisfaction survey in its entirety at the conclusion of their OT initial evaluation and the post-4 weeks OT satisfaction survey at the end of four weeks of OT service
- Refusal of LEP participants to use professional interpreter services
- Refusal of LEP participants to be interviewed at the end of four weeks of OT service
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Limited English Proficiency Group
LEP persons were identified by asking, "What language would you like to receive medical information and services in?" Patients were considered limited English proficient when a non-English language was preferred.
Interventions included professional interpreter services and occupational therapy.
|
Autres noms:
|
|
English Speaking Group
English speaking persons were identified by asking, "What language would you like to receive medical information and services in?" Patients were considered English speaking when the English language was preferred.
Intervention included occupational therapy.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Pre-Occupational Therapy Satisfaction Survey
Délai: Baseline
|
The pre-Occupational Therapy satisfaction survey was developed for this project by the primary investigator to measure perceived satisfaction.
The pre-OT satisfaction survey consists of five demographic items and four items that employ a Likert scale rating method.
The total quantitative scoring range for the survey is four to twenty, with a score of four indicating the lowest satisfaction and a score of 20 indicating the highest satisfaction.
The paper and pencil survey was completed in person by all participants after the initial OT visit.
Survey scores of the LEP group were compared to the English-speaking group.
Equal or better scores reflect agreement that LEP OT perceive quality of care and satisfaction equal to English-speaking patients.
|
Baseline
|
|
Post-4 weeks Occupational Therapy Satisfaction Survey
Délai: 4 weeks from baseline
|
The Post-4 weeks OT satisfaction survey was developed for this project by the primary investigator to measure perceived satisfaction.
The survey consists of five demographic items and four items that employ a Likert scale rating method.
The total quantitative scoring range for the survey is 4 to 20, with a score of 4 indicating the lowest satisfaction and a score of 20 indicating the highest satisfaction.
The post-4 weeks OT satisfaction survey contains three additional items, using a Likert scale rating method to explore qualitative experiences.
Total qualitative scoring range for the survey is 3 to 15, with a score of 3 indicating a low belief in the benefits of OT and a score of 15 indicating a high belief in the benefits of OT.
Scores of the LEP group were compared to the English-speaking group.
Equal or better scores reflect agreement that LEP OT patients receiving IS perceive quality of care and satisfaction equal to English-speaking patients.
|
4 weeks from baseline
|
|
Occupational Therapy Satisfaction Interview
Délai: 4 weeks from baseline
|
Interviews were conducted by the primary investigator, Eileen Turgeon, assisted by Interpreter Services (IS), with each LEP individual following four weeks of OT services and after completion of the post-4 weeks OT satisfaction survey.
The interviews were conducted in person.
The interview consisted of seven open-ended questions meant to capture the qualitative experience of the use of Interpreter Services during OT service delivery.
The literature supports the use of surveys and interviews to gather feedback on LEP patients' perceived quality of care and satisfaction (González et al., 2010; Green et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2002; Shi et al., 2009; Wilson et al., 2005).
The primary investigator presented the open-ended questions with the assistance of IS.
The recorded interviews were reviewed by this primary investigator for emerging themes to provide insight and additional information.
|
4 weeks from baseline
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Eileen D. Turgeon, OTD, Rush University Medical Center
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carrillo JE, Ananeh-Firempong O 2nd. Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):293-302. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.293.
- American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & process (3rd ed.) [Supplemental Section]. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Supl. 1), S1-S48.
- Zuniga GC, Seol YH, Dadig B, Guion WK, Rice V. Progression in understanding and implementing the cultural and linguistic appropriate services standards: five-year follow-up at an academic center. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2013 Apr-Jun;32(2):167-72. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e31828ef655.
- Wilson E, Chen AH, Grumbach K, Wang F, Fernandez A. Effects of limited English proficiency and physician language on health care comprehension. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):800-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0174.x.
- Wells, S. (2011). American Occupational Therapy Association advisory opinion for the ethics commission: Cultural competency and ethical practice. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
- Wardin K. A comparison of verbal evaluation of clients with limited English proficiency and English-speaking clients in physical rehabilitation settings. Am J Occup Ther. 1996 Nov-Dec;50(10):816-25. doi: 10.5014/ajot.50.10.816.
- U.S. News & World Report. (2015). Top-ranked hospitals for orthopedics. Retrieved from http://health.usnews.com/best-hospitals/rankings/orthopedics/data
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). Language use in the United States: 2011 American community survey report (ACS-22). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/language/
- U.S. Census Bureau, 2008-2012 American Community Survey. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
- The Kawa Model: Culturally Relevant Occupational Therapy. (2010). Retrieved from: http://individual.utoronto.ca/michaeliwama/index.htm
- Suarez-Balcazar Y, Rodawoski J, Balcazar F, Taylor-Ritzler T, Portillo N, Barwacz D, Willis C. Perceived levels of cultural competence among occupational therapists. Am J Occup Ther. 2009 Jul-Aug;63(4):498-505. doi: 10.5014/ajot.63.4.498.
- Shi L, Lebrun LA, Tsai J. The influence of English proficiency on access to care. Ethn Health. 2009 Dec;14(6):625-42. doi: 10.1080/13557850903248639.
- Sentell T, Braun KL. Low health literacy, limited English proficiency, and health status in Asians, Latinos, and other racial/ethnic groups in California. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):82-99. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.712621.
- Schier JS, Chan J. Changes in life roles after hand injury. J Hand Ther. 2007 Jan-Mar;20(1):57-68; quiz 69. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.005.
- McLeod, S. (2008). Likert scale. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html
- Lion KC, Mangione-Smith R, Martyn M, Hencz P, Fernandez J, Tamura G. Comprehension on family-centered rounds for limited English proficient families. Acad Pediatr. 2013 May-Jun;13(3):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
- Lindsay S, Tetrault S, Desmaris C, King GA, Pierart G. The cultural brokerage work of occupational therapists in providing culturally sensitive care. Can J Occup Ther. 2014 Apr;81(2):114-23. doi: 10.1177/0008417413520441.
- Lee LJ, Batal HA, Maselli JH, Kutner JS. Effect of Spanish interpretation method on patient satisfaction in an urban walk-in clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug;17(8):641-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10742.x.
- Law, M., & MacDermid, J. (2014). Evidence-Based Rehabilitation: A Guide to Practice, Third Edition. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
- Karliner LS, Perez-Stable EJ, Gildengorin G. The language divide. The importance of training in the use of interpreters for outpatient practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Feb;19(2):175-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30268.x.
- Karliner LS, Napoles-Springer AM, Schillinger D, Bibbins-Domingo K, Perez-Stable EJ. Identification of limited English proficient patients in clinical care. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1555-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0693-y. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
- Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr;42(2):727-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00629.x.
- Jacobs E, Chen AH, Karliner LS, Agger-Gupta N, Mutha S. The need for more research on language barriers in health care: a proposed research agenda. Milbank Q. 2006;84(1):111-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2006.00440.x.
- Iwama M. Culture and occupational therapy: meeting the challenge of relevance in a global world. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14(4):183-7. doi: 10.1002/oti.234. No abstract available.
- Iwama M. Toward culturally relevant epistemologies in occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2003 Sep-Oct;57(5):582-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.582. No abstract available.
- Hyman, I. (2009). Literature review: Costs of not providing interpretation in health care. Access Alliance Publication, LR004, June, 1-15.
- Gonzalez HM, Vega WA, Tarraf W. Health care quality perceptions among foreign-born Latinos and the importance of speaking the same language. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):745-52. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.06.090264.
- Green AR, Ngo-Metzger Q, Legedza AT, Massagli MP, Phillips RS, Iezzoni LI. Interpreter services, language concordance, and health care quality. Experiences of Asian Americans with limited English proficiency. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):1050-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0223.x.
- Gray B, Stanley J, Stubbe M, Hilder J. Communication difficulties with limited English proficiency patients: clinician perceptions of clinical risk and patterns of use of interpreters. N Z Med J. 2011 Sep 9;124(1342):23-38.
- Fryer C, Mackintosh S, Batchelor F, Hill K, Said C. The effect of limited English proficiency on falls risk and falls prevention after stroke. Age Ageing. 2012 Jan;41(1):104-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr127. Epub 2011 Sep 24. No abstract available.
- Flores G. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2005 Jun;62(3):255-99. doi: 10.1177/1077558705275416.
- Cooper, L., & Powe, N. (2004). Disparities in patient experiences, health care processes, and outcomes: The role of patient-provider racial, ethnic, and language concordance. The Commonwealth Fund. Retrieved from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2004/jul/disparities-in-patient-experiences--health-care-processes--and-outcomes--the-role-of-patient-provide
- Chan J, Spencer J. Adaptation to hand injury: an evolving experience. Am J Occup Ther. 2004 Mar-Apr;58(2):128-39. doi: 10.5014/ajot.58.2.128.
- Case-Smith J. Outcomes in hand rehabilitation using occupational therapy services. Am J Occup Ther. 2003 Sep-Oct;57(5):499-506. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.499.
- Burke JP, Gitlin LN. How do we change practice when we have the evidence? Am J Occup Ther. 2012 Sep-Oct;66(5):e85-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.004432.
- Bramberg EB, Sandman L. Communication through in-person interpreters: a qualitative study of home care providers' and social workers' views. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Jan;22(1-2):159-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04312.x. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 14110802-IRB01
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .