Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Application of Carbon Nanoparticles in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

18 novembre 2017 mis à jour par: Aiguo, Lu
The project aims to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, accuracy and economy efficiency of the application of carbon nanoparticles for tumor localization and lymph nodes mapping in the laparoscopic coloectal surgery.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Inconnue

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Colorectal cancer is among the most commonly diagnosed cancer in both men and women . Increasing studies have been focused on the causes and therapies of this disease in order to improve the prognosis. In recent decades, laparoscopy has been commonly used in both colorectal and gastric surgery due to the benefit of minimal invasive technology progression . Its comparable safety and effectiveness have been proved in many studies. The advantages of minimal invasive surgery such as faster recovery, less bleeding and less pain, have also been admitted by numerous surgeons . However, the accomplishment of operation procedures mainly depend on subjective experiences. Even skilled surgeons can be impeded in operation due to the deficiency of tactile sense . As a result, accurate intra-operative localization of tumor would be a tough task if it was invisible on the serosal surface or difficult to approach, such as small or flat neoplasms, tumor confined to the mucosa and submucosa and endoscopically resected polyps which required additional surgery . At present, three dominant methods can be available to locate tumor: preoperative endoscopic clip placement, intraoperative endoscopy and endoscopic tattooing. All of these methods have their advantages but also some unavoidable limitations, such as localization error and problems in the assessment of incision margin using preoperative clip placement, unsatisfactory operation exposure after intraoperative endoscopy, ink spillage or failure in finding lesions with dye endoscopic injection et al. Usually surgeons choose different methods according to the objective conditions such as the ability to perform endoscopy or the availability of suitable tattooing material.

Apart from the precise localization of tumor, adequate lymph node dissection is another crucial point in colorectal operation. According to AJCC recommendation and NCCN guideline, the number of lymph nodes, which has been proved of prognostic and therapeutic importance, is clearly defined in colorectal cancer to make sure of the accurate pathological staging. Previous studies have found that the number of lymph nodes evaluated after surgical resection was positively associated with the survival of patients. Besides Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) and D3 lymph node clearance, which are standards in colorectal surgery over decades of research and accumulated data, the harvest of lymph nodes is still associated with pathological doctors' experience and pathological examination skills. However, population-based data suggest that lymph node evaluation is not adequate in the majority of patients . Some micro lymph nodes, especially with diameter less than 5 mm, are more easily missed in specimen process while rate of metastasis is comparably higher in these lymph nodes. As a result, clinicians are trying to find a lymph node tracer to help improve the amount of lymph node harvest as well as the rate of micro-metastasis in lymph node.

Carbon nanoparticle has been used as a lymph node tracer for decades. As a lymphatic vessel specific dye material, there is no doubt in its effect on lymph node mapping. In recent years, surgeons have applied this tracer widely in breast and thyroid operations for sentinel lymph node mapping to determine dissection extent. The effectiveness and accuracy of this method has been verified in thyroid and breast surgery while there is rare study focused on its application in colorectal surgery. The application of tattooing material, such as methylene blue, India ink and nano-materials in tumor localization has also attracted attentions of clinicians. In our study, three groups based on different tumor localization means are compared on short-term benefits, cost-effectiveness and lymph node clearance in order to choose the best approach to locate tumor and validate lymph node staining effect of carbon nanoparticles.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Anticipé)

150

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 80 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Pathologically diagnosed as colorectal benign tumor or tumor with TNM staging I-III (including patients need further surgery after endoscopic treatment), Be able to tolerate laparoscopic radical resection With normal hepatic and renal function No history of abdominal surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with distant metastasis, poor compliance, prior abdominal surgery Emergency case with obstruction or perforation Have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy Patients diagnosed as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Inflammatory bowel disease such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Tripler

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Device:Titanium Clips
Device: Tumor localization. Preoperative endoscopic localization with titanium clips
At present, three dominant methods can be available to locate tumor: preoperative endoscopic clip placement, intraoperative endoscopy and endoscopic tattooing
Comparateur actif: Device:Intra-operative Endoscopy
Device: Tumor localization. During the laparoscopic surgery,tumor is localized using intra-operative endoscopy detection.
At present, three dominant methods can be available to locate tumor: preoperative endoscopic clip placement, intraoperative endoscopy and endoscopic tattooing
Expérimental: Device:Carbon Nanoparticles
Device: Tumor localization. During the laparoscopic surgery,tumor is localized using carbon nanoparticles.
At present, three dominant methods can be available to locate tumor: preoperative endoscopic clip placement, intraoperative endoscopy and endoscopic tattooing

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Tumor localization time
Délai: within 1 month
From abdominal exploration to tumor localization
within 1 month

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
survival data 1
Délai: within 5 year
overall survival
within 5 year
survival data 2
Délai: within 5 year
disease free survival
within 5 year
Post-operative complication rates
Délai: within 6 month
According to the records in hospital
within 6 month
Distal edge distance of specimen
Délai: within 2 weeks
measured by two pathologists separately
within 2 weeks
LN number dissected
Délai: within 2-3 weeks
measured by two pathologists separately
within 2-3 weeks
Length of stay
Délai: within a year
According to the record in hospital
within a year
Total operation time
Délai: within 1 week
Measured according to operation record
within 1 week
Blood loss
Délai: within 1 week
Measured according to operation record
within 1 week

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chaise d'étude: Minhua Zheng, Ruijin Hospital

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Anticipé)

1 décembre 2017

Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)

1 août 2019

Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)

31 décembre 2019

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

5 novembre 2017

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 novembre 2017

Première publication (Réel)

22 novembre 2017

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

22 novembre 2017

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 novembre 2017

Dernière vérification

1 novembre 2017

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner