Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Short Versus Long Stitch for Laparotomy Closure (Shortstitch)

30 janvier 2019 mis à jour par: University of Malaya

Comparison Of Post-operative Pain In Short Versus Long Stitch Technique For Abdominal Wall Closure After Elective Laparotomy- A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Laparotomy is a surgical procedure where an incision is made through the abdominal wall in order to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Midline laparotomy incisions were the main type of abdominal access. However, there were complications associated with laparotomy such as incisional hernia, post-operative pain, surgical site infection and burst abdomen. The anterior abdominal wall consists of skin, fascia, subcutaneous fat, external oblique aponeurosis, internal oblique muscles, transversus abdominis and rectus muscles. The skin and parietal peritoneum are supplied by T7- T12 and L1 nerve. Hence, breaching of the peritoneum, giving rise to post-operative laparotomy pain. It is reported that approximately 60% of patients who underwent laparotomy do complain of post-operative pain.

Techniques of abdominal wall closure has been constantly in order to develop an ideal suture technique to minimise wound complications. One of the most significant changes in abdominal closure technique was the introduction of mass closure technique, known as 'long stitch' (LS). This conventional mass closure, uses a suture-to-wound length ratio (SL:WL) of 4:1, achieved by the use of continuous sutures at one centimetre from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of one centimetre. Studies have shown LS caused compression of tissues enclosed in the mass stitch, leading to tissue ischaemia and necrosis. 'Short stitch' (SS) was introduced in 1980s where it was reported to result in lower rate of incisional hernia and surgical site infection. It has a SL:WL of more than four, achieved by placing the suture five millimetres from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of five millimetre as well. It incorporates only the linea alba, which may reduce tension and post-operative pain.Studies has indicate that approximately 40% of post-operative patients reported inadequate pain relief despite therapeutic intervention. Inadequate pain control is associated with complications such as atelectasis, prolonged immobilization and hospital stay, thromboembolic event, cardiac morbidity, insomnia, ileus and poor wound healing The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain is commonly used as measures of pain score or intensity in clinical trials. A more objective way to evaluate the post-operative pain is to assess the usage of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over a period of time. The commonly used PCA drug for post-operative patient is morphine. As SS relies on less tension and proper distribution of force along the fascial plane, it is possible that it might reduce post-operative pain as compared to LS technique. It can be assessed using total usage of analgesia (intravenous infusion or PCA), with correlation to the respective visual-analogue scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) at that particular time. There is no study that evaluate post-operative pain difference between SS and LS technique.

The hypothesis of this study is that SS will reduce PCA morphine usage after midline laparotomy, which translate into reduction in post-operative pain. In order to detect the 30% reduction of PCA morphine, 86 patients are required.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Laparotomy is a surgical procedure where an incision is made through the abdominal wall in order to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Midline laparotomy incisions were the main type of abdominal access However, there were complications associated with laparotomy such as incisional hernia, post-operative pain, surgical site infection and burst abdomen. The anterior abdominal wall consists of skin, fascia, subcutaneous fat, external oblique aponeurosis, internal oblique muscles, transversus abdominis and rectus muscles. The rectus abdominis muscles is covered by rectus sheath, formed by aponeurosis of the internal oblique muscles except posterior layer from the arcuate line downwards. The sheath contains the ends of the lower six thoracic nerves (T7-T12) with first lumbar nerve The skin and parietal peritoneum are supplied by T7- T12 and L1 nerve. Hence, breaching of the peritoneum, giving rise to post-operative laparotomy pain. It is reported that approximately 60% of patients who underwent laparotomy do complain of post-operative pain.

Techniques of abdominal wall closure has been constantly revised in order to develop an ideal suture technique to minimise wound complications. One of the most significant changes in abdominal closure technique was the introduction of mass closure technique, known as 'long stitch' (LS). This conventional mass closure, uses a suture-to-wound length ratio (SL:WL) of 4:1, achieved by the use of continuous sutures at one centimetre from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of one centimetre. Studies have shown LS caused compression of tissues enclosed in the mass stitch, leading to tissue ischaemia and necrosis. 'Short stitch' (SS) was introduced in 1980s where it was reported to result in lower rate of incisional hernia and surgical site infection. It has a SL:WL of more than four, achieved by placing the suture five millimetres from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of five millimetre as well. It incorporates only the linea alba, which may reduce tension and post-operative pain.

Effective post-operative pain management is an important aspect in surgical patient care. Studies has indicate that approximately 40% of post-operative patients reported inadequate pain relief despite therapeutic intervention. Inadequate pain control is associated with complications such as atelectasis, prolonged immobilization and hospital stay, thromboembolic event, cardiac morbidity, insomnia, ileus and poor wound healing. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain is commonly used as measures of pain score or intensity in clinical trials. A more objective way to evaluate the post-operative pain is to assess the usage of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over a period of time. The commonly used PCA drug for post-operative patient is morphine. As SS relies on less tension and proper distribution of force along the fascial plane, it is possible that it might reduce post-operative pain as compared to LS technique. It can be assessed using total usage of analgesia (intravenous infusion or PCA), with correlation to the respective visual-analogue scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) at that particular time. There is no study that evaluate post-operative pain difference between SS and LS technique.

This is a prospective, multi-centered, double-blind randomized controlled trial to look into comparison of post-operative pain after elective laparotomy: short versus long stitch technique of closure in two tertiary hospitals. The study started in January 2017 and completed in November 2018. Patient who fulfilled the criteria of recruitment were included into this study.

In order to detect difference of 30% of PCA morphine usage, 86 patients are required. Both group of patients will received equal pre-operative analgesia, antibiotics and induction again. Patients will be randomized into LS and SS group. Once the aim of the surgery is achieved, the operating surgeon will open the sealed enveloped, which contain the group and technique of suture used. Postoperatively patient will be receiving oral paracetamol and taught on PCA morphine usage. PCA morphine usage and VAS score will be assessed by medical officer that are blinded to the treatment. Primary outcome is PCA morphine usage 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcome are presence of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay. Patients will subsequently be discharged by the surgeon in charge based on the discharge criteria. Patients will be follow-up in outpatient clinic on same interval. Presence of adverse events or complications will be documented.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

86

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective primary midline laparotomy,
  • ASA Class I to III
  • hemodynamically stable
  • able to provide consent for surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency laparotomy
  • pregnancy
  • history of previous midline laparotomy
  • allergic to opiates
  • unable to use PCA morphine (handicapped)
  • patient will be planned for stoma creation

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Short stitch
short stitch used as one arm
The rectus sheath are cleaned off the subcutaneous fats. Short stitch technique uses smaller needle and suture material. The suture is placed nearer to each other as compared to our conventional long stitch technique. It has inter-suture distance of 5mm and 5mm distance from rectus edge. The suture will be started at one end and sutured continuous until the other end. Hence, this technique is applied without tension.
Long stitch uses a larger needle and suture material. The suture is placed 1cm from the linea alba and 1 cm from previous suture. This technique include mass closure sutures at the midline laparotomy
Comparateur actif: Long stitch
Long stitch as conventional mass-closure technique
The rectus sheath are cleaned off the subcutaneous fats. Short stitch technique uses smaller needle and suture material. The suture is placed nearer to each other as compared to our conventional long stitch technique. It has inter-suture distance of 5mm and 5mm distance from rectus edge. The suture will be started at one end and sutured continuous until the other end. Hence, this technique is applied without tension.
Long stitch uses a larger needle and suture material. The suture is placed 1cm from the linea alba and 1 cm from previous suture. This technique include mass closure sutures at the midline laparotomy

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Reduction of PCA morphine usage post-operatively
Délai: 24 hours
Measure total usage of PCA morphine
24 hours

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Presence of Surgical site infection
Délai: throughout hospital stay, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and then 8 weeks during follow up (up to 1 year)
Any surgical site infection at surgical site
throughout hospital stay, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and then 8 weeks during follow up (up to 1 year)
Length of hospital stay
Délai: since day 1 hospital admission until the time when patient is deemed fit to be discharged (up to 1 month)
number of days patient was admitted in the ward
since day 1 hospital admission until the time when patient is deemed fit to be discharged (up to 1 month)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 janvier 2017

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 novembre 2018

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 novembre 2018

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

28 janvier 2019

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 janvier 2019

Première publication (Réel)

4 février 2019

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

4 février 2019

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 janvier 2019

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2019

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner