Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Obesity, Lifestyle and Work Intervention

21 mars 2019 mis à jour par: Molde University College

Does Adding A Work Intervention Into An Already Existing Life Style Intervention Improve Work Ability? A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

The main aim of this study was to examine whether introducing a work intervention into a traditional lifestyle rehabilitation program for persons with BMI above 30, would affect the participants' ability to work and their lifestyle change. The investigators wanted to find out how the participants experienced their health, workability and work capacity, quality of life, diet and self-efficacy before and during the intervention

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

The background for this study was insights about obesity and sick leave. Obesity is related to lower labor force participation, increased sickness absence and reduced productivity. A Danish study from 2006 reported a yearly 1, 8 million extra days of work absence and close to 1.100 cases of disability pension related to obesity. A 2016-report from OECD show that persons with obesity between the ages 50-59 have three times as much work absence as those who do not struggle with obesity. This indicates that persons with obesity are a group where the need for work rehabilitation is important. Despite this connection, work focus has not been a part of lifestyle interventions for persons with morbid obesity until the last two years.

By introducing a work intervention into a traditional lifestyle rehabilitation program for persons with BMI over 30, the investigators wanted to examine whether this would affect the participants' ability to work and their lifestyle change. The study was designed as a randomized controlled study with an exploring prospective design. The intervention lasted 12 months and each patient had three visits (baseline, 6 and 12 months) at Muritunet, each lasting 4-2-2 weeks. The participants were randomized into two intervention, one with work intervention and one without.

Data material gathered at each stay consisting of self-reported forms, test, journal and individual interviews. These were all collected at baseline, and at six and twelve months.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

140

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 65 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30 with or without comorbidity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People without a capacity to consent.
  • People with severe alcohol and/or drug abuse.
  • People with a major mental illness.
  • Being pregnant.
  • People with a health condition that contraindicates physical activity.
  • People with or plan to apply for disability benefits.
  • People with permanently adapted work.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Lifestyle and work intervention
Lifestyle intervention with work focus.

The intervention period lasted for a year with three institution-based stay, 4 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at 6 and 12 months. At baseline, participants got a functional assessment and an individual adjusted rehabilitation plan.

At all three stages: The intervention contains activity training with focus on joy of movement, strength- and cardio-training. There was lectures and cognitive therapy to promote self-care and lifestyle change. The intervention contained lectures on diet, nutrition and cooking-classes. Participants set goals at baseline and adjusting these during the progress. They developed exercise programs designed to use at home.

Expérimental: Lifestyle intervention
Lifestyle intervention without work focus.
The intervention period lasted for a year with three institution-based stays, 4 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at 6 and 12 months. At baseline, participants got a functional assessment and an individual adjusted rehabilitation plan. At all three stages: The intervention contains activity training with a focus on the joy of movement, strength- and cardio-training. There were lectures and cognitive therapy to promote self-care and lifestyle change. The intervention contained lectures on diet, nutrition and cooking-classes. Participants set goals at baseline and adjusting these during the progress. Exercise programs was designed to use at home. The Cognitive Information Processing model of career guidance was the mainframe for the work dimension. All participants had talks with the work consultant at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Two work lectures, "Duties and rights as employees" and "Work as medicine". When needed the work consultant contacted the employer in order to facilitate changes.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Full or partial return to work.
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Mapping changes in work employability and work related factors with survey data from the ARR form (http://www.arbeidoghelse.no).
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Weight loss (kilograms)
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Measured changes with Tanita MC-780U Multi Frequency Segmental Body Composition Analyzer.
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Return to work self-efficacy
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Mapping changes with the Return-to-work-efficacy scale (RTWSE-19). The 19-item RTWSE-19 scale is a new self-report measure intended to assess workers' beliefs of their current ability to resume normal job responsibilities following pain onset. Response range (1-10). 1 is "not sure at all" and 10 is "very sure". The 19 subscales are divided into three main categories, and the total score is the sum of these catagories. Higher value indicate better outcome. (Shaw et.al 2011).
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Quality of Life (15D), health-related quality of life
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Mapping changes in 15D. The 15D is a generic, comprehensive (15-dimensional), self-administered instrument for measuring HRQoL. 5 ordinal levels on each dimension, by which more or less of the attribute is distinguished. A set of utility or preference weights is used to generate the 15D score (single index number) on a 0-1 scale. The valuation system of the 15D is based on an application of the multiattribute utility theory. The single index (15D score) on a 0 1 scale, representing the overall HRQoL (0 = being dead, 0.0162 = being unconscious or comatose, 1 = no problems on any dimension = 'full' HRQOL) is calculated from the health state descriptive system by using a set of population based preference or utility weights. (Harri Sintonen, http://www.15d-instrument.net).
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Subjective somatic and psychological complaints
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Mapping changes with the scoring system subjective health complaints (SHC). The SHC consists of 29 questions concerning severity and duration of subjective somatic and psychological complaints. Intensity of each complaint is scored on a four-point scale from 0-3, where 0 is no complaints and three is severe complaints. The SHC inventory yields scores on single items and a total number of health complaints categorized into five factors: musculoskeletal pain (alpha=0.74), pseudoneurology (alpha=0.73), gastrointestinal problems (alpha=0.62), allergy (alpha=0.58) and flu (alpha=0.67). Eriksen HR, Ihlebæk C, Ursin H. A scoring system for subjective Health complaints (SHC). Scand J Public Health. 1999;27:63-72.
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Vo2 peak
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline and 12 months.
Measured changes in the maximum amount of oxygen the participant can utilize during intense exercise. Measured in litres of oxygen per minute (L/min) or as a relative rate in (for example) millilitres of oxygen per kilogram of body mass per minute (e.g., mL/(kg·min). Physical test on a treadmill.
Data collected during the interventions, baseline and 12 months.
Body Mass Index
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Height will be added in Tanita MC-780U Multi Frequency Segmental Body Composition Analyzer. BMI will be reported in kg/m².
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Waist circumstance (cm).
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Measured changes with Tanita MC-780U Multi Frequency Segmental Body Composition Analyzer.
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Hight (centimetmeters)
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline.
The distance from the bottom of the feet to the top of the head, standing erect, measured with a stadiometer, in centimetres.
Data collected during the interventions, baseline.
Promoting and hindering factors for Return to work.
Délai: Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Mapping contextual conditions and mechanisms that might be important in the process back to work through In-Depth interviews
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Geir Ove Vegsund, Muritunet

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

3 septembre 2014

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

31 décembre 2017

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 février 2018

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

14 mars 2019

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 mars 2019

Première publication (Réel)

22 mars 2019

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

22 mars 2019

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 mars 2019

Dernière vérification

1 mars 2019

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2014/697 REK South-East

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Abstract and lecture: Nordic Conference in Work and Rehabilitation. Abstract and lecture: Work Disability Prevention and Integration Conference 2019 An article in BMC Public Health, 2019, qualitative results. An article, mixed methods results, 2019

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner