Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

13-year Follow-up of Women With Chronic Low Back Pain in Primary Care - a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

25 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Vastra Gotaland Region

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is among the main causes of long-term sickness absence and is associated with considerable costs for both the individual and society. LBP affects 60-80% of the population and most individuals recover, while about 10-20% develop persistent pain and disability. Women have a higher risk of developing chronic LBP (CLBP) and widespread pain.

Purpose: To investigate change in body function, activity, participation and other health related factors in women with CLBP after 13 years and to identify prognostic factors for pain, activity limitation and work ability.

Methods: In the present study, all women (n = 131) who were included in the cross-sectional study in 2006 and who were followed-up after 2 years are now invited to the same study-protocol 13 years after the first examination in 2006.

The Swedish Ethical Review Authority approved the study. Dnr: 2019-01944, 2019-05-21.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is among the main causes of long-term sickness absence and is associated with considerable costs for both the individual and society. LBP affects 60-80% of the population and most individuals recover, while about 10-20% develop persistent pain and disability. Women have a higher risk of developing chronic LBP (CLBP) and widespread pain.

How LBP develops into recurrent and or more persistent pain with disability is not fully understood. Prognostic factors for pain development, work ability and self-rated activity limitation in 1 and 2-year follow-ups of persons with CLBP who sought primary care are described. Performance on physical capacity tests (6-min walking test), limitations on self-rated activity and participation and psycho-social factors play a role in unfavorable pain and function development. However, there are patients with CLBP who have no anatomical, demographic or psychosocial explanation of their symptoms. Some people with CLBP also have widespread pain and show altered pain sensitivity as fibromyalgia.

Purpose:To investigate change in body function, activity, participation and other health related factors in women with CLBP after 13 years and to identify prognostic factors for pain, activity limitation and work ability.

Methods: In the present study, all women (n = 131) who were included in the cross-sectional study in 2006 and who were followed-up after 2 years are now invited to the same study-protocol 13 years after the first examination in 2006.

Participants will be assessed by a registered physiotherapist at one occasion. Demographic data are collected, Questions about social support, sleep quality and sleep quantity, smoking and alcohol consumption. Self-reported questionnaires, pain and function performance tests will be assessed.

Data Analysis: Descriptive analysis based on data level; mean value (standard deviation), median (25th; 75th percentile), number and proportion will be used to present the group's characteristics. For analysis of change between the first assessment and after 13 years, Wilcoxon's signed rank test will be used for continuous variables and Teckentest / McNemar's test will be used for nominal data.

Multivariable regression analysis will be performed to calculate predictors of pain intensity (VAS), number of pain locations/pain distribution, self-rated activity limitation (RMDQ) and work ability after 13 years. Independent variables will be variables at the first assessment within the domains; body function (pain intensity, pain distribution, pain sensitivity, anxiety, depression, function test and stress), activity (RMDQ) and participation (work ability), as well as other health-related factors (Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36), Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument, Experience of Physical Activity). Multivariable regression models will be adjusted for age, level of education and social status. P-value is set to 0.05.

Ethical approval: The Swedish Ethical Review Authority approved the study. Dnr: 2019-01944, 2019-05-21.

Expected Results: The results is expected to provide knowledge about long-term clinical course (13 years) and prognostic factors for a positive pain and function development of CLBP in women seeking primary care.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Réel)

87

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Sweden
      • Alingsås, Sweden, Suède
        • Närhälsan, Region Västra Götaland
      • Borås, Sweden, Suède
        • R&D primary care, Region Västra Götaland
      • Uddevalla, Sweden, Suède
        • Närhälsan, Region Västra Götaland

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 75 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

The 183 women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in the cross-sectional study in 2006 and 131 accepted participation. All 131 from the cross-sectional study are now invited to participate in the present 13-year follow-up.The inclusion criteria at the first assessment in 2006 were: female patient, age between 18 and 60 years, low back pain (pain between costal margins and gluteal folds) with or without referred leg pain. Further criteria were; greater than 12-week's duration of symptoms, not pregnant, no known spinal disorders, no other severe somatic or psychiatric disorders, understanding in Swedish.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All participants (n=131) included in the Cross Sectional Study in 2006

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Serious somatic disorders
  • Serious psychiatric disorders

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Modèles d'observation: Cohorte
  • Perspectives temporelles: Éventuel

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
131 participants with chronic low back pain
All the participants (n=131) with chronic low back pain (CLBP) from the cross-sectional study in 2006 are invited to participate in the present 13-year follow-up. The same examination battery used in the cross-sectional study plus a supplementary Chair Stand Test will be used.
13-year prospective longitudinal cohort study

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Activity limitation
Délai: 2019, change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019), identify predictors (2006) for activity limitation (RMDQ) at the 13-year follow-up
Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) will be used.
2019, change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019), identify predictors (2006) for activity limitation (RMDQ) at the 13-year follow-up
Pain intensity
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019), identify predictors (2006) for pain intensity (VAS) at the 13-year follow-up.
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging 0 to 100 mm will be used for pain intensity during the last week. 0 mm indicates no pain and 100 mm indicates very severe pain. Higher score indicates more severe pain.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019), identify predictors (2006) for pain intensity (VAS) at the 13-year follow-up.
Work ability
Délai: 2019, Comparison from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019), identify predictors (2006) for work ability at the 13-year follow-up.
Sick-leave periods, and sickness and activity compensation is obtained from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency's MiDAS database. Self-reported work status dichotomized into two categories, work ability or not will be used.
2019, Comparison from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019), identify predictors (2006) for work ability at the 13-year follow-up.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Pain distribution
Délai: 2019, Comparison from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019), identify predictors (2006) for pain distribution at the 13-year follow-up.
A drawing of the body will be used for assessing distribution of pain
2019, Comparison from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019), identify predictors (2006) for pain distribution at the 13-year follow-up.

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Walking capacity
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) will be used. The person walks back and forth in a measured distance of 30 meters for 6 minutes. The number of meters achieved is recorded.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Lower limb muscle endurance and muscle strength
Délai: 2019
The Chair Stand Test (CST) will be used.
2019
Hand grip strength
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
The Grippit®, electronic hand strength measurement will be used. Sustained hand grip strength will be measured during 10 seconds for each hand.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Hand grip strength
Délai: 2019
The Jamar Hand Dynamometer®, will be used for measuring hand grip strength for each hand.
2019
Pain sensitivity/pain threshold
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Somedic algometer® will be used.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Fatigue
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) will be used.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
General fatigue
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging 0 to 100 mm will be used for general fatigue during the last week. 0 mm indicates no tiredness and 100 mm indicates very tired. Higher score indicates more severe general fatigue.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Sleep quantity
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
One question will be used: "Do you think you get enough sleep?" (Range 1-4). Higher score indicate better sleep quantity.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Sleep quality
Délai: Time frame: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019)
One questions will be used: "On the whole, how do you think you sleep?" (Range 1-4). Higher score indicate better sleep quality.
Time frame: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019)
Social support
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
The 4-item version of Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey will be used.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Stress
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Stress and Crisis Inventory (SCI-93) will be used for measuring clinical symptoms of stress.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Physical function
Délai: 2019, Comparison from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
The Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), will be used for the participant´s self-identified activities that are difficult to perform due to low back pain. Then the participant rates the level of difficulty for each identified activity on an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("unable to perform activity") to 10 ("able to perform activity unhindered or at pre-injury level").
2019, Comparison from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Leisure Time Physical Activity
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument (LTPAI) will be used to assess the amount of self-rated physical activity in free time during a typical week
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Experience of physical activity
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Experience of physical activity questionnaire will be used.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Risk for long-term disability and sick-leave
Délai: 2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ), estimate the risk for long-term disability and sick-leave. The sum score of 21 items will be used.
2019, Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Health-related quality of life
Délai: Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Short Form-36 (SF-36) will be used to measure health-related quality of life.
Change from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
Alcohol consumption
Délai: Comparison from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (Audit-C) will be used.
Comparison from the first assessment (2006) to the present 13-year follow-up (2019).

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Collaborateurs

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Lena Nordeman, PhD, R&D primary care Region Västra Götaland, University of Gothenburg Sweden

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

10 juin 2019

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

31 mars 2020

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

31 mars 2020

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

27 mai 2019

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

31 mai 2019

Première publication (Réel)

4 juin 2019

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

28 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

25 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mars 2025

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner