Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Vexus Assessment and Natriuresis-guided Diuretic Therapy in Acute Heart Failure (VANTAGE-HF)

23 avril 2026 mis à jour par: Kristian Berge, University Hospital, Akershus
This study evaluates whether natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy improves outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) and severe congestion. All patients hospitalized with AHF will be screened using Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) and randomized 1:1 to either natriuresis-guided escalation of loop diuretics or standard care. The primary endpoint, evaluated in patients with VExUS grade 3 (severe congestion), is a hierarchical composite (win ratio) of 90-day mortality, 90-day rehospitalization, and hospital length of stay. Key secondary endpoints (hierarchical) include (1) difference in win ratio between patients with VExUS 3 versus VExUS 0-2 at hospital admission (assessed by interaction testing and statistically tested only if the primary endpoint is significant) and (2) win ratio (primary endpoint) tested among patients with VExUS 0-2 at hospital admission (statistically tested only if the first key seconday endpoint is significant). Exploratory endpoints include in-hospital clinical, hemodynamic, and biochemical outcomes (mortality, eGFR, NT-proBNP, NYHA class, VExUS score, natriuresis/diuresis, and patient-reported dyspnea), associations between congestion markers (VExUS, FibroScan, lung ultrasound, clinical score, and NT-proBNP), as well as quality of life at 90 days, GDMT optimization score at discharge, and long-term time to readmission and mortality assessed through registry linkage.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Heart failure (HF) affects approximately 2% of the general population, and despite advances in medical therapy, outcomes after hospitalization for acute HF (AHF) remain poor. One-year mortality is nearly fourfold higher in hospitalized compared to non-hospitalized HF patients, and more than half require rehospitalization. Residual congestion at discharge is the strongest predictor of adverse outcomes, yet only one in four patients leaves the hospital adequately decongested. Current HF guidelines highlight decongestive strategies as a major evidence gap.

The VANTAGE-HF trial addresses this critical gap by combining two complementary strategies: precision patient stratification using Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) and structured natriuresis-guided titration of loop diuretics. VExUS is a novel, non-invasive ultrasound-based scoring system that significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and severity grading of systemic venous congestion. VExUS score ranges from 0 (no congestion) to 3 (severe congestion), and approximately 40% of hospitalized AHF patients present with VExUS grade 3, a phenotype associated with poor diuretic response and adverse outcomes.

Recent trials have shown that natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy, with stepwise dose escalation if urinary sodium levels remain low, increases the rate of decongestion and reduces hospital length of stay without increasing adverse events. However, these trials were not powered to demonstrate prognostic benefit and did not target specific high-risk subgroups.

All patients admitted with AHF will undergo VExUS assessment within 24 hours of the first administered dose of iv diuretics and will be randomized 1:1 to receive either natriuresis-guided therapy or standard care. In the intervention arm, intravenous loop diuretics will be administered twice daily, and urinary sodium concentration will be measured two hours after each dose. If urinary sodium is less than 70 mmol/L, the subsequent diuretic dose will be doubled, with additional diuretic agents including thiazides and/or acetazolamide added if maximum loop diuretic dosing is reached.

The primary endpoint, evaluated in patients with VExUS grade 3 (severe congestion), is a hierarchical composite win ratio of 90-day mortality, 90-day rehospitalization, and hospital length of stay. Key secondary endpoints are tested hierarchically: first, whether the win ratio differs between patients with VExUS grade 3 versus VExUS grade 0-2 at admission (interaction analysis, tested only if the primary endpoint is significant); and second, the win ratio for natriuresis-guided therapy versus standard care in patients with VExUS grade 0-2 (tested only if the first key secondary endpoint is significant). Exploratory endpoints include in-hospital clinical, hemodynamic, and biochemical outcomes (mortality, eGFR, NT-proBNP, NYHA class, VExUS score, natriuresis/diuresis, and patient-reported dyspnea), associations between congestion markers (VExUS, FibroScan liver stiffness measurement, lung ultrasound, clinical congestion score, and NT-proBNP), quality of life at 90 days, GDMT optimization score at discharge, and long-term time to readmission and mortality assessed through registry linkage.

The trial has important implications beyond individual patient outcomes. More effective decongestion could shorten hospital stays and prevent rehospitalizations-two key drivers of strain on healthcare systems. By addressing inadequate decongestion, a major source of preventable harm, the trial aims to improve patient outcomes while offering a low-cost, scalable approach that integrates seamlessly into routine clinical workflows.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

270

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Akershus
      • Lørenskog, Akershus, Norvège, 1478
        • Akershus University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Chercheur principal:
          • Kristian Berge, MD PhD
    • Østfold fylke
      • Sarpsborg, Østfold fylke, Norvège, 1714
        • Østfold Hospital Trust
        • Contact:
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Kristin M Kvakkestad, MD PhD

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Hospitalization with AHF, either de novo or worsening of chronic HF
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Requirement of intravenous loop diuretic treatment as judged by the treating physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dyspnea primarily due to non-cardiac causes
  • Advanced renal disease or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 20 mL/min/1.73m2 at screening or on-going dialysis.
  • Enrollment in another study interfering with the treatment algorithm of the current study
  • Inability to follow the treatment protocol
  • Language barriers requiring the need for an external interpreter
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Very short life expectancy (<30 days)

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Natriuresis-guided decongestion
In the intervention arm, intravenous loop diuretics will be administered twice daily, and urinary sodium concentration will be measured two hours after each dose. If urinary sodium is less than 70 mmol/L, the subsequent diuretic dose will be doubled, with additional diuretic agents added if maximum loop diuretic dosing is reached.
In the intervention arm, intravenous loop diuretics will be administered twice daily, and urinary sodium concentration will be measured two hours after each dose. If urinary sodium is less than 70 mmol/L, the subsequent diuretic dose will be doubled, with additional diuretic agents added if maximum loop diuretic dosing is reached.
Autres noms:
  • Intervention
  • Natriuresis-guided therapy
  • Natriuresis-guided decongestion
Aucune intervention: Treatment as usual
Standard care, decongestive strategy left at the discretion of the treating physician

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Win Ratio in patients with VExUS score 3
Délai: 90 days
Win Ratio of hierarchical composite endpoint (90-day all-cause mortality, 90-day all-cause rehospitalization, and index hospitalization length of stay) comparing natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy versus standard of care in patients with acute heart failure and severe venous congestion (VExUS score 3) at hospital admission.
90 days

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Key Secondary Endpoint 1: Difference in win ratio between patients with VExUS grade 3 versus VExUS grade 0-2
Délai: 90 days
Interaction analysis assessing whether the win ratio of the primary composite endpoint (90-day mortality, 90-day rehospitalization, and hospital length of stay) for natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy versus standard of care differs between patients with VExUS grade 3 and patients with VExUS grade 0-2 at hospital admission. Tested only if the primary endpoint is statistically significant.
90 days
Key Secondary Endpoint 2: Win ratio in patients with VExUS grade 0-2
Délai: 90 days
Hierarchical composite win ratio of 90-day mortality, 90-day rehospitalization, and hospital length of stay for natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy versus standard of care, assessed in patients with VExUS grade 0-2 at hospital admission. Tested only if Key Secondary Endpoint 1 is statistically significant.
90 days

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
90-day time-to-mortality
Délai: 90 days
Difference in survival stratified by VExUS score and intervention group
90 days
90-day time-to-hospitalization
Délai: 90 days
Difference in hospitalization stratified by VExUS score and intervention group
90 days
Hospital length-of-stay
Délai: 90 days
Comparison of hospital length-of-stay between different VExUS score groups and intervention groups
90 days
In-hospital mortality
Délai: From date and time of hospital admission to in-hospital death, censored at time of discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Assessed as time-to-mortality from date and time of admission measured in hours.
From date and time of hospital admission to in-hospital death, censored at time of discharge, assessed up to 30 days
6-month rehospitalization
Délai: 6 months
Time to first hospital readmission (long-term follow-up with registries)
6 months
6-month all-cause mortality
Délai: 6 months
Time to mortality (long-term follow-up with registries)
6 months
Change in patient-reported dyspnea from admission to end of decongestive therapy (7-point Likert scale)
Délai: From hospital admission to pre-discharge assessment (at hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days.
Changes in dyspnea severity from admission to discharge, assessed by a 7-point Likert scale ranging from markedly worse (-3) to markedly better (+3), with 0 indicating no change. Assessed at hospital discharge.
From hospital admission to pre-discharge assessment (at hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days.
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (delta-value)
Délai: Baseline (within 24 hours of hospital admission, including emergency department measurements) and pre-discharge (last day prior to discharge), assessed up to 7 days
In-hospital change in eGFR from admission to discharge. Difference between eGFR measured in the emergency department and the last day before hospital discharge from the index hospitalization.
Baseline (within 24 hours of hospital admission, including emergency department measurements) and pre-discharge (last day prior to discharge), assessed up to 7 days
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) score
Délai: Baseline (at hospital admission, reflecting pre-admission therapy) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
Difference in achieved heart failure GDMT score at discharge (range 0-9), and delta value compared to admission. GDMT score is a composite medication score (range 0-9) assessing optimization of four HF drug classes at discharge. Beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors/ARBs are each scored 0 (not prescribed), 1 (<50% of target daily dose), or 2 (≥50% of target daily dose). ARNI substitution for ACEi/ARB is scored 3. MRA and SGLT2 inhibitor use are each scored 2 (any dose).
Baseline (at hospital admission, reflecting pre-admission therapy) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
Absolute values of NT-proBNP at discharge
Délai: Pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first)
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide value within 24h from discharge or day 7 (whichever occurs first)
Pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first)
Change in NT-proBNP
Délai: Baseline (within 24 hours of hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
In-hospital change (delta value) in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide from admission to pre-discharge assessment (<24 hours from discharge or day 7, whichever occurs first)
Baseline (within 24 hours of hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
Change in quality of life (KCCQ overall summary score) from baseline assessment to 90 days after discharge
Délai: Change in KCCQ Overall Summary Score (0-100) from baseline (admission) to 90 days post-discharge
Quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, KCCQ) The KCCQ is a 23-item disease-specific self-administered questionnaire assessing health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure. The Overall Summary Score (range 0-100) integrates physical limitation, symptom frequency and burden, quality of life, and social limitation domains, with higher scores indicating better health status. Assessed at baseline/hospital admission of index hospitalization and at 90 days (telephone visit). Will be assessed as the difference of values (delta values).
Change in KCCQ Overall Summary Score (0-100) from baseline (admission) to 90 days post-discharge
Change in NYHA class
Délai: Baseline (at hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
New York Heart Association functional class (values 1-4) will be assessed at hospital admission (baseline) and at hospital discharge. Will be assessed as the difference in absolute values (delta value).
Baseline (at hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
Total administered dose of loop diuretics (mg) during index hospitalization
Délai: From hospital admission to discharge, assessed up to 7 days
Total administered dose of loop diuretics (mg) during index hospitalization
From hospital admission to discharge, assessed up to 7 days
Changes in VExUS score from admission to discharge
Délai: Baseline (within 24 hours of hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7), assessed up to 7 days
In-hospital change in Venous Excess Ultrasound score from admission to discharge,
Baseline (within 24 hours of hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7), assessed up to 7 days
Changes in LMS assessed by FibroScan from admission to discharge
Délai: Baseline (within 24 hours of hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
In-hospital change in LMS assessed by FibroScan from admission to discharge.
Baseline (within 24 hours of hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
Changes in clinical congestion score from admission to discharge
Délai: Baseline (at hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
In-hospital change in clinical congestion score from admission to discharge
Baseline (at hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
Changes in lung ultrasound congestion score from admission to discharge
Délai: Baseline (at hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days
In-hospital change in lung ultrasound from admission to discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first). Eight lung zones are examined (two anterior and two lateral zones per hemithorax). Each zone is scored 0-3 based on B-line pattern: 0 = ≤2 B-lines (normal aeration), 1 = 3-5 discrete B-lines (mild interstitial edema), 2 = ≥5 confluent B-lines (moderate congestion), 3 = white lung or consolidation (severe congestion). Scores are summed to a total of 0-24.
Baseline (at hospital admission) and pre-discharge (hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever occurs first), assessed up to 7 days

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 avril 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 décembre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juin 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

7 avril 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

23 avril 2026

Première publication (Réel)

30 avril 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

30 avril 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

23 avril 2026

Dernière vérification

1 avril 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 25/11917
  • 2026005 (Autre subvention/numéro de financement: South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

The investigators do not plan to share individual participant data.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner