The Effect of a Nutrition Education Program
23 avril 2026 mis à jour par: DİLEK YILDIRIM, Istanbul Aydın University
The Effect of a Nutrition Education Program on Dietary Intake and Nutritional Status in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study is a randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effect of a nutritional education program on dietary intake and nutritional status in cancer patients.
Patients were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, with the intervention group receiving structured nutritional education.
Participants' nutritional status and daily dietary intake were assessed at baseline and during the follow-up period.
The study aims to demonstrate that nutritional education can increase food intake and be effective in improving nutritional status in patients.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured nutritional education program in improving nutritional status in cancer patients. In cancer patients, the disease itself and the treatments administered (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc.) increase the risk of malnutrition due to decreased appetite, taste alterations, nausea, vomiting, and metabolic changes. Therefore, nutritional interventions are critically important for clinical outcomes in this group.
Patients included in the study were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group received an individualized and structured nutritional education program. This program included the importance of adequate energy and protein intake, nutritional strategies for symptoms, appropriate food selection, meal planning, and practical nutritional recommendations. The training was supported by both face-to-face sessions and follow-up interviews as needed. The control group continued with routine clinical care.
The nutritional status of the patients was assessed at baseline and at designated follow-up intervals. Clinical nutritional screening tools (such as NRS-2002), anthropometric measurements (body weight, BMI), and food intake records were used to determine nutritional status. Daily energy and protein intakes of the patients were also analyzed.
The primary aim of this study is to determine whether nutritional education increases patients' dietary intake and consequently reduces their risk of malnutrition. The impact of the educational intervention on patients' nutritional awareness, symptom management, and overall eating behaviors is also evaluated.
The results are expected to contribute to the inclusion of nutritional education as a standard intervention in nursing care for oncology patients and to guide clinical practice.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
80
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Istanbul
-
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turquie (Türkiye), 34295
- Istanbul Aydin University, Beşyol Mah. İnönü Cad. No: 38 Küçükçekmece / İstanbul
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Oui
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients diagnosed with cancer (>18 years)
- Receiving active cancer treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy)
- Able to take oral nutrition
- Willing and able to participate in the nutrition education program
- Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition
- Severe cognitive impairment or inability to communicate
- Critical or terminal condition preventing participation in education sessions
- Severe comorbidities affecting dietary intake independently (e.g., advanced heart failure, end-stage renal disease)
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Experimental Group
Participants in the experimental group received a structured and individualized nutrition education program in addition to routine clinical care.
The intervention was delivered by a trained healthcare professional and focused on improving dietary intake and nutritional status in cancer patients.
The program included education on adequate energy and protein intake, management of treatment-related symptoms affecting nutrition (such as nausea, anorexia, and taste changes), appropriate food selection, meal planning strategies, and practical dietary recommendations tailored to individual needs.
The education was provided through face-to-face sessions with follow-up reinforcement sessions during the study period.
|
The intervention consisted of a structured and individualized nutrition education program designed for cancer patients.
The program was delivered by a trained healthcare professional and aimed to improve dietary intake and nutritional status.
It included education on adequate energy and protein consumption, management of treatment-related symptoms affecting food intake (such as nausea, anorexia, and taste changes), appropriate food selection, meal planning strategies, and practical dietary recommendations tailored to individual needs.
The intervention was implemented through face-to-face educational sessions with follow-up reinforcement during the study period, in addition to routine clinical care.
|
|
Aucune intervention: Control Group
Participants in the control group received routine clinical care only during the study period.
No structured nutrition education or additional dietary counseling was provided beyond standard hospital practices.
Patients continued their usual follow-up and medical care as determined by their treating healthcare team.
Nutritional status and dietary intake assessments were performed at the same time points as in the experimental group for comparison purposes.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Information Form
Délai: First Day
|
The Patient Information Form was developed by the researchers in accordance with the relevant literature.
It included items related to patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, such as age, gender, educational status, presence and site of metastasis, number of chemotherapy cycles administered at the time of enrollment, chemotherapy schedule, chemotherapy regimen, and type of chemotherapy (adjuvant or neoadjuvant).
|
First Day
|
|
Subjective Global Assessment
Délai: First day
|
The SGA is a nutritional assessment tool, which has been shown to demonstrate a strong correlation between subjective clinical judgment and objective nutritional measures.
Due to its simplicity and predictive validity comparable to objective methods, it is widely used in clinical practice.
The SGA includes components such as medical history (weight change over the past six months, dietary intake changes, gastrointestinal symptoms such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), as well as functional capacity.
Physical examination findings assess subcutaneous fat loss, muscle wasting, and edema, each scored as 0 (normal), 1+ (mild), 2+ (moderate), or 3+ (severe).
|
First day
|
|
Subjective Global Assessment
Délai: at the 4th week
|
The SGA is a nutritional assessment tool, which has been shown to demonstrate a strong correlation between subjective clinical judgment and objective nutritional measures.
Due to its simplicity and predictive validity comparable to objective methods, it is widely used in clinical practice.
The SGA includes components such as medical history (weight change over the past six months, dietary intake changes, gastrointestinal symptoms such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), as well as functional capacity.
Physical examination findings assess subcutaneous fat loss, muscle wasting, and edema, each scored as 0 (normal), 1+ (mild), 2+ (moderate), or 3+ (severe).
|
at the 4th week
|
|
Subjective Global Assessment
Délai: at the 8th week
|
The SGA is a nutritional assessment tool, which has been shown to demonstrate a strong correlation between subjective clinical judgment and objective nutritional measures.
Due to its simplicity and predictive validity comparable to objective methods, it is widely used in clinical practice.
The SGA includes components such as medical history (weight change over the past six months, dietary intake changes, gastrointestinal symptoms such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), as well as functional capacity.
Physical examination findings assess subcutaneous fat loss, muscle wasting, and edema, each scored as 0 (normal), 1+ (mild), 2+ (moderate), or 3+ (severe).
|
at the 8th week
|
|
Nutritional Risk Screening
Délai: The First day
|
The NRS-2002 aims to identify malnutrition and the risk of malnutrition, and to determine patients who may benefit from nutritional support.
The scoring system consists of two sections: 'nutritional status' and 'disease severity,' and allows for scoring as 'no problem,' 'mild,' 'moderate,' and 'severe.'
Each section is scored from 0 to 3. In patients over seventy years of age, an additional 1 point is added to the score due to age.
Patients with a total score ≥3 are considered to be at nutritional risk.
|
The First day
|
|
Nutritional Risk Screening
Délai: at the 4th week
|
The NRS-2002 aims to identify malnutrition and the risk of malnutrition, and to determine patients who may benefit from nutritional support.
The scoring system consists of two sections: 'nutritional status' and 'disease severity,' and allows for scoring as 'no problem,' 'mild,' 'moderate,' and 'severe.'
Each section is scored from 0 to 3. In patients over seventy years of age, an additional 1 point is added to the score due to age.
Patients with a total score ≥3 are considered to be at nutritional risk.
|
at the 4th week
|
|
Nutritional Risk Screening
Délai: at the 8th week
|
The NRS-2002 aims to identify malnutrition and the risk of malnutrition, and to determine patients who may benefit from nutritional support.
The scoring system consists of two sections: 'nutritional status' and 'disease severity,' and allows for scoring as 'no problem,' 'mild,' 'moderate,' and 'severe.'
Each section is scored from 0 to 3. In patients over seventy years of age, an additional 1 point is added to the score due to age.
Patients with a total score ≥3 are considered to be at nutritional risk.
|
at the 8th week
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
20 janvier 2024
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
30 mars 2026
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
15 avril 2026
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
23 avril 2026
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
23 avril 2026
Première publication (Réel)
1 mai 2026
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
1 mai 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
23 avril 2026
Dernière vérification
1 avril 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- Nutrition Education Program
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .