Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Maitland Mobilization Versus Therapeutic Ultrasound on Trismus Following Third Molar Surgery

16 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Rahma Ahmed Esmail, Cairo University

Effect of Maitland Mobilization Versus Therapeutic Ultrasound on Trismus Following Third Molar Surgery

This study aims to compare the effect of Maitland mobilization and therapeutic ultrasound on trismus (limited mouth opening) following third molar (wisdom tooth) surgery.

Participants who experience limited mouth opening after third molar surgery will receive one of two treatment methods: Maitland joint mobilization or therapeutic ultrasound. These treatments are commonly used in physical therapy to improve jaw movement and reduce stiffness.

The purpose of this study is to determine which treatment is more effective in improving mouth opening and reducing symptoms after surgery.

Participation is voluntary, and all collected information will be kept confidential and used only for research purposes.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This randomized clinical study will investigate the effect of Maitland mobilization compared to therapeutic ultrasound on trismus following third molar (wisdom tooth) surgery.

Trismus, characterized by limited mouth opening, is a common postoperative complication after third molar extraction and can affect oral function and quality of life All patients of both groups received Standard Postoperative Care designed to promote natural recovery after third molar surgery. The standard care protocol includes the use of Cold Compresses/Ice Packs, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), basic jaw exercises at home to prevent further restriction of jaw movement.

Group A Maitland Mobilization group: Participants received Maitland mobilization therapy. The manual therapy involved graded oscillatory movements targeting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), aimed at improving jaw mobility and reducing pain following third molar surgery. Each therapy session lasted approximately 15-20 minutes and was conducted three times a week over a period of four weeks. During each session, the physiotherapist applied different grades of mobilization depending on the patient's progress. Grade I and II movements-small, rhythmic oscillations-were used initially to reduce pain and relax the muscles. As the treatment progressed, Grade III and IV mobilizations were applied to stretch the joint capsule and further improve range of motion. Additionally, patients were instructed to perform home exercises to maintain the therapeutic gains between sessions, such as gentle jaw stretching and mouth-opening exercises .

Group B (Therapeutic Ultrasound group): The procedure involved using an ultrasound device , such as the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2, which operates at a 1 MHz frequency to target deep tissues like the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and surrounding muscles. The therapy was conducted three times a week for four weeks, with each session lasting 10-15 minutes. A water-based conductive gel was applied to the skin to facilitate effective transmission of sound waves, and the intensity of the ultrasound was adjusted between 0.8 to 1.5 W/cm² based on patient tolerance. The transducer was moved in slow, circular motions over the TMJ and affected muscles, focusing on areas of pain or stiffness. Group C (Control group ): received traditional physical therapy program only. The outcomes measured included Maximum Interincisal Opening (MIO) via a Vernier Caliper. MIO was measured as the primary indicator of jaw mobility in patients experiencing postoperative trismus. MIO is the distance between the upper and lower central incisors when the patient opens their mouth fully, with the patient seated comfortably and properly supported. The MIO was recorded at baseline (before the intervention) and again at the end of the 4-week intervention period. Each measurement was repeated three times to ensure accuracy, with the average of the three readings used as the final recorded value. This process allows for consistent and precise tracking of improvements in jaw mobility over time.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

60

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • El-Sharqia Governorate
      • Abū Ḩammād, El-Sharqia Governorate, Egypte
        • Abu Hammad General Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were included in this study have the following criteria

    • Sixty patients had done third molar extraction surgery
    • Patients suffering from postoperative trismus within 2 to 14 days post-surgery.
    • Their age between 20 and 30 years old
    • All patients are medically and clinically stable when attending the study 2.1.2. Exclusion criteria:

The study excluded the following patients:

  • Pre-existing TMJ Disorders: Patients with a history of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders or jaw-related conditions (e.g., TMJ dislocation, arthritis, or previous TMJ surgery).
  • Neurological or Muscular Disorders: (e.g., facial palsy, stroke, muscular dystrophy).
  • Previous Jaw Surgery or Trauma.
  • Use of Muscle Relaxants or other form of Physical Therapy treatment.
  • Chronic Pain Syndromes: such as fibromyalgia or chronic migraines
  • Infections or abscesses post-Surgery.
  • Patients have auditory and visual problems

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Maitland Mobilization Group
Participants in this group received Maitland mobilization techniques applied to the temporomandibular joint. The intervention was performed by a trained therapist using graded passive mobilization techniques aimed at improving joint mobility and reducing trismus. Treatment sessions were conducted over the study period with standardized frequency and duration
Maitland mobilization was applied to the temporomandibular joint using graded passive accessory and physiological joint mobilization techniques (Grade I-IV depending on patient tolerance). The technique was performed by a trained physical therapist to improve joint mobility and reduce trismus following third molar surgery. Treatment sessions were conducted three times per week for four weeks
Expérimental: Therapeutic Ultrasound group
Participants received therapeutic ultrasound applied to the temporomandibular joint and surrounding muscles. The ultrasound was delivered at a frequency of 1 MHz to target deep tissues. Treatment sessions were conducted three times per week for four weeks, with each session lasting 10-15 minutes. A water-based conductive gel was applied to enhance transmission of sound waves. The intensity ranged from 0.8 to 1.5 W/cm² based on patient tolerance, and the transducer was moved in slow circular motions over the affected area to reduce pain and stiffness
using an ultrasound device , such as the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2, which operates at a 1 MHz frequency to target deep tissues like the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and surrounding muscles. The therapy was conducted three times a week for four weeks, with each session lasting 10-15 minutes. A water-based conductive gel was applied to the skin to facilitate effective transmission of sound waves, and the intensity of the ultrasound was adjusted between 0.8 to 1.5 W/cm² based on patient tolerance. The transducer was moved in slow, circular motions over the TMJ and affected muscles, focusing on areas of pain or stiffness (Bhushan et al., 2025).
Comparateur actif: Control group
traditional physical therapy program (Standard Postoperative Care, Cold Compresses/Ice Packs, NSAIDs);
the traditional physical therapy program (Standard Postoperative Care, Cold Compresses/Ice acks, NSAIDs);

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Pain intensity level
Délai: Baseline, immediately post-intervention

Pain intensity level via The Visual Analog Scale (VAS):

The VAS is self-completed by the participant. The participant is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS 100 mm line at the point that represents their pain intensity. The examiner reported the VAS score by measuring the distance (mm) from the marked point to the "no pain" anchor using a ruler, providing a range of scores from 0 -100 (Boonstra et al., 2008)

Baseline, immediately post-intervention

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Maximum Interincisal Opening
Délai: Baseline, immediately post-intervention

Maximum Interincisal Opening (MIO) via a digital caliper:

The maximum interincisal opening (MIO) measured as the primary indicator of jaw mobility in patients experiencing postoperative trismus. MIO is the distance between the upper and lower central incisors when the patient opens their mouth fully. The measurement taken using a digital caliper, with the patient seated comfortably and properly supported. The MIO will be recorded at baseline (before the intervention) and again at the end of the 4-week intervention period. Each measurement repeated three times to ensure accuracy, with the average of the three readings used as the final recorded value. This process allow for consistent and precise tracking of improvements in jaw mobility over time (Buesa-Bárez et al., 2018).

Baseline, immediately post-intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

10 mai 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

10 juillet 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

25 juillet 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

3 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

3 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

8 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

20 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner