Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Air Stacking-Assisted Diaphragmatic Breathing in Stroke

5 mai 2026 mis à jour par: jang ji-hun

Effects of Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercise Using the Air Stacking Technique on Respiratory and Trunk Function in Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a diaphragmatic breathing exercise using the air stacking technique can improve respiratory function and trunk control in patients with stroke. The experimental group will perform an air stacking-based diaphragmatic breathing exercise using an Ambu-bag, combined with neurodevelopmental treatment, three times per week for 20 minutes over a 4-week period. The control group will receive therapist-guided diaphragmatic breathing exercises with the same frequency and duration, together with the same neurodevelopmental treatment. All participants will be assessed before and after the intervention for pulmonary function, chest wall expansion, and trunk control ability, as well as the Korean version of the Trunk Impairment Scale (K-TIS), the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSTS), and the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (Borg RPE). Changes between the two groups will be compared to determine the therapeutic effectiveness of the air stacking technique.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

This clinical trial is a randomized controlled study designed to evaluate the effects of a diaphragmatic breathing exercise using the air stacking technique on respiratory and trunk function in patients with stroke. Patients with stroke are prone to respiratory muscle weakness, reduced chest wall expansion, and impaired trunk control, which can limit functional recovery and increase the risk of pulmonary complications. The air stacking technique increases lung volume and chest expansion through consecutive inspirations without exhalation and is known to facilitate more effective breathing and coughing, but its therapeutic effects in patients with stroke have not yet been fully established.

In this study, 20 patients with stroke will be randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 10) or a control group (n = 10), using blocked randomization to ensure balance between groups. To enhance the objectivity of outcome assessment, all evaluations will be performed by an assessor who is blinded to group allocation. The experimental group will perform an air stacking-based diaphragmatic breathing exercise using an Ambu-bag, three times per week for 20 minutes over a 4-week period, in addition to neurodevelopmental treatment. The control group will receive therapist-guided diaphragmatic breathing exercises with the same frequency and duration, combined with the same neurodevelopmental treatment program. Both groups will receive the interventions for 4 weeks in the same rehabilitation setting.

All participants will undergo assessments before the start of the intervention and after completion of the 4-week program. Outcome measures will include pulmonary function tests (for example, FVC and FEV1), chest wall expansion, and trunk control ability. In addition, trunk function and functional mobility will be evaluated using the Korean version of the Trunk Impairment Scale (K-TIS) and the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSTS), and perceived exertion during exercise will be assessed using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (Borg RPE). Pre- to post-intervention changes will be calculated for each participant, and differences in these changes between the experimental and control groups will be analyzed.

The aim of this study is to determine whether a diaphragmatic breathing exercise using the air stacking technique provides additional benefits over conventional diaphragmatic breathing in improving pulmonary function, chest wall expansion, trunk control, and functional performance in patients with stroke. The findings are expected to demonstrate the therapeutic potential and clinical feasibility of an Ambu-bag-assisted air stacking technique and to contribute to the development of more effective respiratory and trunk rehabilitation strategies for individuals with stroke.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

20

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Corée du Sud
    • Daegu
      • Daegu, Daegu, Corée du Sud, 41199
        • Daegu Fatima Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatients diagnosed with stroke (intracerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction) at a general hospital in Daegu, currently receiving physical therapy
  • Onset of stroke at least 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Spasticity grade of 2 or less on the Modified Ashworth Scale
  • No congenital deformity or fracture of the thorax or other orthopedic conditions affecting the chest wall
  • No history of pulmonary disease before or after the stroke
  • Able to perform respiratory exercises as instructed
  • Mini-Mental State Examination-Korean version (MMSE-K) score of 24 or higher, indicating sufficient cognitive ability to understand the study procedures
  • Presence of decreased pulmonary function (reduced pulmonary function test parameters) at baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute stroke status or onset of stroke less than 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease that makes participation in respiratory exercise unsafe or impossible
  • Cognitive impairment or communication disorder that prevents understanding or performing the study procedures
  • Any other medical or safety condition judged by the investigator to make participation in the study inappropriate

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Air stacking-assisted diaphragmatic breathing
articipants in this arm will receive diaphragmatic breathing exercises using the air stacking technique with an Ambu-bag three times per week for 20 minutes over 4 weeks, in addition to routine neurodevelopmental treatment.
Comportemental: Air stacking-assisted diaphragmatic breathing
Diaphragmatic breathing exercise using the air stacking technique with an Ambu-bag, performed three times per week for 20 minutes over 4 weeks, in addition to routine neurodevelopmental treatment.
Comparateur actif: diaphragmatic breathing
Participants in this arm will receive diaphragmatic breathing exercises three times per week for 20 minutes over 4 weeks, together with the same neurodevelopmental treatment as the experimental group.
Comportemental: diaphragmatic breathing
diaphragmatic breathing exercise performed three times per week for 20 minutes over 4 weeks, together with the same neurodevelopmental treatment as the experimental group.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Délai: Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Forced vital capacity (FVC) will be assessed using spirometry at baseline and 4 weeks after the start of the intervention. The outcome measure is the change in FVC from baseline to 4 weeks in each group.
Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Délai: Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) will be assessed using spirometry at baseline and 4 weeks after the start of the intervention. The outcome measure is the change in FEV1 from baseline to 4 weeks in each group.
Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Change in FEV1/FVC ratio
Délai: Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
The ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) will be assessed using spirometry at baseline and 4 weeks after the start of the intervention. The outcome measure is the change in FEV1/FVC from baseline to 4 weeks in each group.
Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Change in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Délai: Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) will be assessed using spirometry at baseline and 4 weeks after the start of the intervention. The outcome measure is the change in PEF from baseline to 4 weeks in each group.
Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Trunk Function (Korean Version of the Trunk Impairment Scale, K-TIS)
Délai: Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Trunk function will be assessed using the Korean version of the Trunk Impairment Scale (K-TIS) at baseline and 4 weeks after the start of the intervention. The K-TIS is a clinical scale ranging from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicating better trunk function. The outcome measure is the change in K-TIS total score from baseline to 4 weeks in each group.
Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Change in Functional Lower Extremity Performance (Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test, FTSTS)
Délai: Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Functional lower extremity performance will be assessed using the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSTS) at baseline and 4 weeks after the start of the intervention. The FTSTS records the time in seconds required to complete five repetitions of rising from and returning to a seated position. Higher times indicate poorer functional performance. The outcome measure is the change in FTSTS completion time from baseline to 4 weeks in each group.
Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Change in Perceived Exertion (Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale)
Délai: Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention
Perceived exertion during breathing exercises will be assessed using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale at baseline and 4 weeks after the start of the intervention. The Borg scale ranges from 6 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater perceived exertion. The outcome measure is the change in Borg scale score from baseline to 4 weeks in each group.
Baseline and 4 weeks after the start of intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

jang ji-hun

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

25 septembre 2025

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

21 février 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

21 février 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

28 avril 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

11 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

11 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2025-05-001

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner