Medicsen Smartpatch: Safety & Performance (SOUNDD) (SOUNDD)
Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Performance of the Medicsen Smartpatch, a Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Drug Delivery Medical Device (SOUNDD Study)
The goal of this clinical trial is to understand the efficacy of Medicsen's Smartpatch to deliver drugs through the skin in healthy volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is the administration with Medicsen Smartpatch safe for the patient?
- Can Medicsen's Smartpatch be used to effectively administer drugs to patients?
Researchers will compare administration with Medicsen's Smartpatch with the subcutaneous administration of the drug to see if the efficacy and safety are comparable
Participants will be asked to fill a tolerability survey after receiving each of the two interventions: Subcutaneous administration and Medicse's Smartpatch.
Blood samples will be taken at different timepoints to asses for efficacy of each treatment.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
The clinical investigation will be conducted in two stages:
Stage 1: A first-in-human pilot study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and exploratory performance of the Medicsen Smartpatch for drug delivery in healthy volunteers: a single-center, open-label study.
Stage 2: A confirmatory study to evaluate the performance of the Medicsen Smartpatch by comparing sonophoresis with subcutaneous drug delivery: a randomized, single-dose, open-label, two-way crossover study in healthy volunteers.
Study subjects will be monitored for device-attributable adverse effects during the scheduled examinations and at any examinations resulting from study subjects' self-reported concerns. A licensed physician will review any unanticipated adverse events associated with the protocol.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Madrid
-
Madrid, Madrid, Espagne, 28034
- Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects must provide signed informed consent prior to participation in any study related procedures
- Healthy Caucasian volunteers, any sex, aged between 18 to 55 years
- Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 and 30.0 kg/m2
- Ability and agreement to comply with the study requirements
- Medical history and physical examination within normal limits.
- No clinically relevant abnormalities in hematology, biochemistry, virology, or urine tests.
- Participants who engage in sexual activity which could result in pregnancy for themselves or their partner(s) must agree to use highly effective methods of contraception during the clinical investigation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Case history of hypersensitivity to medicinal products or any other allergic process that could interfere with study according to the investigator's judgement.
- Current relevant disease, including respiratory disease, cardiovascular, endocrine, neurological, haematological, renal, neoplasic, hepatopathy, dermatology, gastrointestinal distress, hypertension, or infectious acute processes that could interfere with study according to the investigator's judgement.
- Previous chronic processes or with rebound characteristics that could interfere with study according to the investigator's judgement.
- Administration of topic or systemic medication including medicinal plants within 14 days before the intervention.
- Presence of skin disorders or lesions at the intended application site (e.g., eczema, psoriasis, infections, open wounds), which may interfere with drug absorption or increase risk of adverse effects.
- Implanted electronic medical devices, such as pacemakers or neurostimulators, due to potential interference with ultrasonic energy.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women, due to lack of safety data for either the drug or the ultrasound application in this population.
- Severe cognitive or motor impairment, where safe operation of the patch cannot be ensured, unless under continuous caregiver supervision.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Sonophoresis
In the sonophoresis arm, the drug is administered to the volunteers through the application of ultrasound waves that increase the skin permeability.
|
This intervention consists of administering the drug using the Medicsen Smartpatch, a non-invasive, needle-free drug delivery device that utilizes sonophoresis technology to enhance absorption through the skin.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Subcutaneous injection
In the subcutaneous injection arm, the drug is administered to the volunteers through means of subcutaneous injection.
|
This intervention consists of administering the drug via standard subcutaneous injection using a pre-filled pen injector
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Stage 1 - Device-related adverse events (adverse device effects; ADEs)
Délai: Periprocedural
|
Primary Outcome Measure of Stage 1. Incidence and severity of ADEs is assesed, with special focus on those occurred at the site of administration and those leading to treatment interruption. |
Periprocedural
|
|
Stage 1 - Assessment of local tolerability through questionnaires and visual examination
Délai: Periprocedural
|
Primary Outcome Measure of Stage 1. Subject-reported sensations (pain/burning, itching/stinging, discomfort) during and after administration are assesed through questionnaires. Dermatologist-evaluated skin signs (erythema, edema, vesicles, crusts/exudate, scaling/lichenification, hematomas/bleeding, tenderness) are assesed through visual examination. |
Periprocedural
|
|
Stage 2 - Area under the curve (AUC0-∞ and AUC0-t)
Délai: Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
Primary Outcome Measure of Stage 2
|
Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
|
Stage 2 - Peak plasma concentration (Cmax)
Délai: Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
Primary Outcome Measure of Stage 2
|
Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Stage 1 - Peak plasma concentration (Cmax)
Délai: Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 1.
|
Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
|
Stage 1 -Area under the curve (AUC0-∞ and AUC0-t)
Délai: Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 1.
|
Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
|
Stage 1 - Tmax and t1/2
Délai: Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 1.
|
Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
|
Stage 1 - Time at which the device notifies that the full dose has been delivered.
Délai: Periprocedural
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 1.
|
Periprocedural
|
|
Stage 2 - Tmax and t1/2
Délai: Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2.
|
Prior intervention and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes post-dose
|
|
Stage 2 - Incidence and severity of ADEs
Délai: Periprocedural
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2.
|
Periprocedural
|
|
Stage 2 - Number of participants with treatment-emergent clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters (hematology and biochemistry)
Délai: Through study completion
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2. Number of participants with laboratory values outside the normal reference range that are considered clinically significant compared to baseline. This includes hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, Red blood cell, MCV, MCH, MCHC, White blood cell with differential, and platelets) and biochemistry (urea, creatinine, glucose, AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT), GGT, ALP, and total bilirubin). Unit of measure: Participants |
Through study completion
|
|
Stage 2 - Number of participants with treatment-emergent clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs.
Délai: Through study completion
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2. Number of participants with vital sign values outside the normal reference range that are considered clinically significant compared to baseline. This includes Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Heart Rate (HR), Respiratory Rate (RR), and Temperature (T) measured before and after the procedure. Unit of measure: Participants |
Through study completion
|
|
Stage 2 - Number of participants with changes in electrocardiogram from baseline
Délai: Through study completion
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2. A standard 12-lead ECG is performed with an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals before and after the procedure to determine changes from baseline values. |
Through study completion
|
|
Stage 2 - Assessment of local tolerability through questionnaires and visual examination
Délai: Periprocedural
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2. Subject-reported sensations (pain/burning, itching/stinging, discomfort) during and after administration of both interventions are assesed through questionnaires. Dermatologist- evaluated skin signs (erythema, edema, vesicles, crusts/exudate, scaling/lichenification, hematomas/bleeding, tenderness) after Medicsen Smartpatch intervention are assesed through visual examination. |
Periprocedural
|
|
Stage 2 - Time at which the device notifies that the full dose has been delivered.
Délai: Periprocedural
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2
|
Periprocedural
|
|
Stage 2 - Usability endpoints (for healthcare professionals)
Délai: Immediately after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2. Rate of first-attempt success, time to complete setup, clarity of instructions, and user-reported ease-of-use scores for healthcare professionals are assesed through the Healthcare Proffesionals' Usability Questionnaire, in which a score from 1 to 5 is given to each of the measurements, and where a higher score means a worse outcome. |
Immediately after the intervention
|
|
Stage 2 - Usability endpoints (for patients)
Délai: Immediately after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measure of Stage 2. Comfort and willingness to reuse the device are assesed through the Patient's Usability Questionnaire, in which a score from 1 to 5 is given to each of the measures, and where a higher score means a worse outcome. |
Immediately after the intervention
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- McLenon J, Rogers MAM. The fear of needles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jan;75(1):30-42. doi: 10.1111/jan.13818. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
- Mitragotri S, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal protein delivery. Science. 1995 Aug 11;269(5225):850-3. doi: 10.1126/science.7638603.
- Mannocci A, De Carli G, Di Bari V, Saulle R, Unim B, Nicolotti N, Carbonari L, Puro V, La Torre G. How Much do Needlestick Injuries Cost? A Systematic Review of the Economic Evaluations of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries Among Healthcare Personnel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;37(6):635-46. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.48. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
- Elder A, Paterson C. Sharps injuries in UK health care: a review of injury rates, viral transmission and potential efficacy of safety devices. Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Dec;56(8):566-74. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kql122. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
- Aronson R. The role of comfort and discomfort in insulin therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Aug;14(8):741-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0038. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
- Wagner J, Malchoff C, Abbott G. Invasiveness as a barrier to self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005 Aug;7(4):612-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.612.
- Jenkins K. II. Needle phobia: a psychological perspective. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):4-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu013. Epub 2014 Feb 25. No abstract available.
- Schoellhammer CM, Polat BE, Mendenhall J, Maa R, Jones B, Hart DP, Langer R, Blankschtein D. Rapid skin permeabilization by the simultaneous application of dual-frequency, high-intensity ultrasound. J Control Release. 2012 Oct 28;163(2):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
- Barati AH, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Mozdarani H, Bathaie Z, Hassan ZM. Effect of exposure parameters on cavitation induced by low-level dual-frequency ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem. 2007 Sep;14(6):783-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.12.016. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
- Tezel A, Sens A, Mitragotri S. Investigations of the role of cavitation in low-frequency sonophoresis using acoustic spectroscopy. J Pharm Sci. 2002 Feb;91(2):444-53. doi: 10.1002/jps.10024.
- Tachibana K. Transdermal delivery of insulin to alloxan-diabetic rabbits by ultrasound exposure. Pharm Res. 1992 Jul;9(7):952-4. doi: 10.1023/a:1015869420159. No abstract available.
- Tachibana K, Tachibana S. Transdermal delivery of insulin by ultrasonic vibration. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991 Apr;43(4):270-1. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1991.tb06681.x.
- Williams AR. Phonophoresis: an in vivo evaluation using three topical anaesthetic preparations. Ultrasonics. 1990 May;28(3):137-41. doi: 10.1016/0041-624x(90)90075-y.
- Levy D, Kost J, Meshulam Y, Langer R. Effect of ultrasound on transdermal drug delivery to rats and guinea pigs. J Clin Invest. 1989 Jun;83(6):2074-8. doi: 10.1172/JCI114119.
- Bommannan D, Okuyama H, Stauffer P, Guy RH. Sonophoresis. I. The use of high-frequency ultrasound to enhance transdermal drug delivery. Pharm Res. 1992 Apr;9(4):559-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1015808917491.
- Mitragotri S, Edwards DA, Blankschtein D, Langer R. A mechanistic study of ultrasonically-enhanced transdermal drug delivery. J Pharm Sci. 1995 Jun;84(6):697-706. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600840607.
- Park D, Park H, Seo J, Lee S. Sonophoresis in transdermal drug deliverys. Ultrasonics. 2014 Jan;54(1):56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
- Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, Blankschtein D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. J Control Release. 2011 Jun 30;152(3):330-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
- Bos JD, Meinardi MM. The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Exp Dermatol. 2000 Jun;9(3):165-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009003165.x.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- MSP-001
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .