- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07643519
Neoadjuvant Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Radical cystectomy remains the standard curative-intent treatment for most patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but it is associated with significant morbidity and long-term quality-of-life implications. Trimodality therapy is an accepted standard-of-care alternative for carefully selected patients who wish to preserve their bladder; however, optimal patient selection remains challenging.
The combination of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV-P) has demonstrated remarkable activity in urothelial carcinoma, including in the perioperative setting, with pathologic complete response rates of approximately 50-60%. These results generate the hypothesis that a subset of patients may achieve sufficiently deep responses to allow selective deferral of cystectomy. Cohort A of this trial prospectively evaluates the use of multimodal response assessment (pelvic MRI and TURBT, ctDNA) to guide individualized decisions regarding cystectomy versus bladder preservation.
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard curative-intent treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but recurrence rates after surgery alone are high. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improves pathologic outcomes and is supported by phase II data, but its delivery is constrained by baseline renal dysfunction and the further decline in glomerular filtration that follows RNU - historically, only about 20% of patients remain cisplatin-eligible postoperatively, which is the principal rationale for delivering platinum in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting. A large fraction of patients with UTUC are cisplatin-ineligible at baseline, and no level 1 evidence supports a specific neoadjuvant regimen in this population.
EV-P is not constrained by renal function and has produced unprecedented activity in urothelial carcinoma. In the EV-302 upper tract subgroup, EV-P achieved an objective response rate of 67.7% and a complete response rate of 28.6%, with survival benefit preserved relative to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the perioperative bladder cancer setting, EV-P has yielded pathologic complete response rates of approximately 50-60%. However, available data on EV-P in UTUC are restricted to the metastatic setting, and prospective evaluation in the neoadjuvant setting is lacking. Cohort B of this trial addresses this gap by prospectively evaluating neoadjuvant EV-P followed by RNU in patients with high-risk UTUC, with pathologic complete response as the primary endpoint.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- Phase 2
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults ≥ 18 years of age.
- ECOG Performance Status of 0-2
- For Cohort A, a clinical or pathological diagnosis consistent with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (locoregional), with a clinical staging of T2 or higher, N0 to N2, and M0.
For Cohort B, a clinical or pathological diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, with high-intermediate risk or higher per NCCN guidelines, planned for definitive surgery.
- High-intermediate: High grade + Unifocal <1.5 cm
High: High grade + Multifocal or >1.5 cm or high-grade renal obstruction or invasion on axial imaging Any proportion of divergent differentiation is permitted across all histologies (except neuroendocrine - see exclusion criteria), as long as a urothelial component is identified.
- Eligible to receive enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV-P) in the opinion of the investigators.
- Written informed consent obtained from the subject and the subject agrees to comply with all the study-related procedures.
- Subjects must not have more than one active malignancy at the time of enrollment.
Note: Subjects with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen or primary endpoint (as determined by the treating physician) are eligible for this trial.
- Subjects of childbearing potential (SOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for at least 4 months after the last dose of EV-P to minimize the risk of pregnancy. Prior to study enrollment, subjects of childbearing potential must be advised of the importance of avoiding pregnancy during trial participation and the potential risk factors for an unintentional pregnancy.
SOCBP includes any subject who has experienced menarche and who has not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or who is not post-menopausal. Post-menopause is defined as:
- Amenorrhea that has lasted for ≥ 12 consecutive months without another cause, or
For subjects with irregular menstrual periods who are taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT), a documented serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level of greater than 35 mIU/mL.
- Subjects with partners of child-bearing potential must agree to use physician-approved contraceptive methods (e.g., abstinence, condoms, vasectomy) throughout the study and should avoid conceiving children for 4 months following the last dose of EV-P.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Histology that contains any component of neuroendocrine carcinoma.
- Any known contraindications to enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
- Subjects who are confirmed to be pregnant or breastfeeding.
- History of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, clinical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of protocol therapy or that might affect the interpretation of the results of the study or that puts the subject at high risk for treatment complications, in the opinion of the treating physician.
- Administration of a vaccine containing live virus within 30 days prior to the first dose of trial treatment. Note: Most flu vaccines are killed viruses, with the exception of the intra-nasal vainer (Flu-Mist) which is an attenuated live virus and therefore prohibited for 30 days prior to first dose.
- Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated, or subjects who are compulsorily detained for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical illness.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Non randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Cohort A (neoadjuvant EV-P + response-adapted management)
Following neoadjuvant EV-P, participants in this cohort will have response-adapted management based on if they achieved a composite clinical complete response (cCR) to determine the next step in their treatment on this study. A participant has achieved cCR if ALL the following are met:
If a participant achieves cCR, they will have a choice between:
If a participant does not achieve cCR, they will have cystectomy. |
Participants in both cohorts will first receive neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab (EV-P) for 4 cycles.
Each cycle is 21 days.
Participants will be given 1.25 mg/kg enfortumab vedotin intravenously on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 of each cycle.
Participants in Cohort A may then choose to receive 5 more cycles of EV-P followed by pembrolizumab alone to complete 1 year of study therapy if they have a composite complete clinical response.
Participants in Cohort B will then receive 5 more cycles of EV-P followed by pembrolizumab alone to complete 1 year of study therapy following their definitive surgery.
|
|
Expérimental: Cohort B (neoadjuvant EV-P + surgery + adjuvant EV-P)
|
Participants in both cohorts will first receive neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab (EV-P) for 4 cycles.
Each cycle is 21 days.
Participants will be given 1.25 mg/kg enfortumab vedotin intravenously on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 of each cycle.
Participants in Cohort A may then choose to receive 5 more cycles of EV-P followed by pembrolizumab alone to complete 1 year of study therapy if they have a composite complete clinical response.
Participants in Cohort B will then receive 5 more cycles of EV-P followed by pembrolizumab alone to complete 1 year of study therapy following their definitive surgery.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical complete response rate
Délai: 3 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant therapy
|
Determine the percent of subjects in Cohort A that achieve a clinical complete response following completion of neoadjuvant EV-P. A clinical complete response is defined as having all three of the following:
|
3 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant therapy
|
|
Pathologic complete response rate
Délai: 8 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant therapy
|
Determine the percent of subjects in Cohort B who achieve a pathologic complete response at the time of surgery.
A pathologic complete response is defined as having disease staging of pT0N0 at time of surgery.
|
8 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant therapy
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Event-free survival
Délai: 1 year from the start of EV-P
|
Determine the event-free survival of patients in Cohort A at 1 year from the start of EV-P
|
1 year from the start of EV-P
|
|
Event-free survival
Délai: 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
Determine the event-free survival of patients in Cohort A at 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
2 years from the start of EV-P
|
|
Overall survival
Délai: 1 year from the start of EV-P
|
Determine the overall survival of patients in Cohort A at 1 year from the start of EV-P
|
1 year from the start of EV-P
|
|
Overall survival
Délai: 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
Determine the overall survival of patients in Cohort A at 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
2 years from the start of EV-P
|
|
Bladder-intact survival
Délai: 1 year from the start of EV-P
|
Determine the bladder-intact survival of patients in Cohort A at 1 year from the start of EV-P
|
1 year from the start of EV-P
|
|
Bladder-intact survival
Délai: 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
Determine the bladder intact survival of patients in Cohort A at 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
2 years from the start of EV-P
|
|
Pathological complete response
Délai: After completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days)
|
Determine number of subjects in cohort A who achieve a pathological complete response after first 4 cycles of EV-P.
|
After completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days)
|
|
Pathologic downstaging
Délai: At completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days)
|
Determine number of patients in cohort A who achieve pathological downstaging (disease staging <pT2N0) after the first 4 cycles of EV-P
|
At completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days)
|
|
Event-free survival
Délai: 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
Determine the event-free survival of patients in Cohort B at 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
2 years from the start of EV-P
|
|
Overall survival
Délai: 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
Determine the overall survival of patients in Cohort B at 2 years from the start of EV-P
|
2 years from the start of EV-P
|
|
Pathologic downstaging
Délai: At completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days)
|
Determine number of patients in cohort B who achieve pathological downstaging (disease staging <pT2N0) after the first 4 cycles of EV-P
|
At completion of first 4 cycles of EV-P (each cycle of EV-P is 21 days)
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Daniel Araujo, MD, University of Florida
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Maladies urogénitales
- Tumeurs urogénitales
- Tumeurs par site
- Tumeurs
- Maladies urogénitales masculines
- Maladies urologiques
- Maladies urogénitales féminines
- Maladies urogénitales féminines et complications de la grossesse
- Tumeurs par type histologique
- Tumeurs, glandulaires et épithéliales
- Tumeurs urologiques
- Carcinome
- Maladies de la vessie urinaire
- Tumeurs de la vessie urinaire
- Carcinome à cellules transitionnelles
- pembrolizumab
- enfortumab vedotin
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- UF-GU-014
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .