Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Theory of Planned Behavior-Based Digital Addiction and Screen Time Management Training for Teachers

18 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Belkıs CAN, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

The Impact of a Planned Behavior Theory-Based Digital Addiction and Screen Time Management Training on Teachers' Internet Addiction, Sleep Quality, and Psychological Well-being

This thesis focuses on problematic internet use, a widespread issue in contemporary society, and its negative effects on sleep quality and psychological well-being. The indispensable role of the internet in daily life and the risks associated with excessive use constitute an important area of research, particularly in relation to internalizing symptoms and health-related problems. Within this context, considering teachers' intensive engagement with digital media and their role as role models, the study aims to improve their awareness and behaviors regarding digital media use.

The aim of the thesis is to examine the effects of a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)-based Digital Addiction and Screen Time Management training program on levels of internet addiction, sleep quality, and psychological well-being among middle school teachers in Aydın province, using a randomized controlled experimental design.

In terms of methodology, a total of 102 teachers-51 in the intervention group and 51 in the control group-will be assessed before and after the training. Data will be collected using a Personal Information Form, the Young Internet Addiction Test-Short Form, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Psychological Well-Being Scale.

The expected outcomes are that the implemented training will significantly reduce teachers' levels of internet addiction, improve their sleep quality, and lead to improvements in psychological well-being. These findings are expected to contribute to teachers' health and to provide guidance for the development of similar intervention programs for other populations.

Aperçu de l'étude

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

80

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Aydın
      • Efeler, Aydın, Turquie (Türkiye)
        • AydınAdnan Menderes University, Faculy of Nursing, Division Public Health Nursing

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Teachers who voluntarily agree to participate in the study and provide written informed consent.

    • Teachers who regularly use digital devices and the internet in their daily lives.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teachers who are receiving medical treatment or psychological support due to digital addiction, sleep disorders, or psychological conditions.
  • Teachers who are unable to attend the training program on a regular basis.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: experimental group
The teachers in the experimental group were provided with Digital Addiction and Screen Time Management Trainings based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, which were developed by the researchers through literature review and expert opinions.
The Digital Addiction and Screen Time Management Training Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior was implemented over a period of six weeks.
Expérimental: Control group
The control group received no intervention.
The control group received no intervention.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Personal Information Form
Délai: Baseline, immediately after intervention, 3 month after intervention.
The form, prepared by the researchers, consists of 9 questions created in line with the literature review, covering general information about the teachers' socio-demographic characteristics.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, 3 month after intervention.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Young Internet Addiction Test-Short Form
Délai: Baseline, immediately after intervention, 3 month after intervention.
The scale was originally developed by Young, and its short form was later created by Pawlikowski, Altstötter-Gleich, and Brand. The scale is a 12-item, unidimensional, 5-point Likert-type scale (scored from 1 to 5). The Turkish adaptation of the scale was carried out by Kutlu and colleagues. The total score ranges from 12 to 60, with no reverse-coded items or cut-off point. Higher scores on the scale indicate a higher level of internet addiction in the individual. While the Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the YIAT-SF scale was 0.85, this value was calculated as 0.89 in this study.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, 3 month after intervention.

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Délai: Baseline, immediately after intervention, 3 month after intervention.
Developed by Buysse et al. (1989), PSQI measures sleep quality/problems over the past month. Cronbach's alpha = 0.80; validity confirmed via test-retest. Turkish adaptation by Ağargün et al. (1996) also showed α = 0.80, confirming psychometric stability. Total 24 items: 19 self-reported, 5 based on spouse/roommate observations (clinical use only; roommate item excluded from scoring). Scoring uses 18 items across 7 components, each item 0-3. Total score 0-21; ≥5 = clinically significant. Components: Subjective Sleep Quality (item 6), Sleep Latency (items 2+5a), Sleep Duration (item 4), Sleep Efficiency (items 1+3+4), Sleep Disturbances (5b-5j), Medication Use (item 7), Daytime Dysfunction (items 8+9). Item 4 is used for both Sleep Duration and Sleep Efficiency, a key design feature.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, 3 month after intervention.
Psychological Well-Being Scale
Délai: Baseline, immediately after intervention, 3 month after intervention.
Diener and colleagues (2009) developed a measurement tool to assess individuals' socio-psychological health status (Diener et al., 2010). This scale was later adapted to Turkish culture by Telef (2013) and transformed into an 8-item form (Telef et al., 2013). In the analyses conducted, the factor loadings of the scale items were found to range between 0.54 and 0.76. As a result of the reliability analyses of the scale, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated as 0.80. It was determined that the item-total correlation coefficients ranged between 0.41 and 0.63, and the t-test results were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The response options used in the scale have a seven-point Likert-type structure: "Strongly disagree," "Disagree," "Slightly disagree," "Undecided," "Slightly agree," "Agree," and "Strongly agree.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, 3 month after intervention.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

8 octobre 2025

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

25 décembre 2025

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

19 mars 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

11 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

18 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

22 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Délai de partage IPD

6 months after publication

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Relevance to the topic of the study and approval of all co-authors within 1 month of receiving the request.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • RSE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner