Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of the LED Mask With or Without the Serum Formula on the Signs of Facial Photodamage .

16 juin 2026 mis à jour par: L'Oreal

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of the LED Mask With or Without the Serum Formula on the Signs of Facial Photodamage

Main objective : To evaluate the anti-aging effectiveness of the LED mask alone on at least one studied anti-aging parameters (including some targeted wrinkles) after 3 months versus baseline

Secondary objectives:

  • Anti-aging clinical score (radiance, skin tone, fine line, ptose, plumpness, ..)
  • Evaluate the consumer perception (self-evaluation)
  • Tolerance
  • Standardized pictures (all light) and pictures analysis
  • Comparison of effectiveness between the 2 groups (with and without formula

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Description détaillée

Rational Photodamaged/aged facial skin is characterized by thinner and drier skin, with increasing sags and wrinkles due to the loss of collagen and elastic tissue. Aging skin is also much more susceptible to the development of brown spots and pigmentation.

The use of LED masks to combat skin aging is based on a scientific principle called photobiomodulation. Red and near-infrared light stimulates cellular repair mechanisms without heating or damaging tissues. Its safety profile is well-documented across all skin types and side effects of phototherapy have been shown as being minimal and temporary.

Design:

Prospective, monocentric, open, non-randomized study conducted in healthy female participant aged 35 to 60 years.

The clinical investigation is design to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a LED mask with or without a serum formula on the anti-aging signs of the face.

There are 2 different groups:

Group 1: investigational device alone /Group 2: investigational device + cosmetic serum. Inclusion in each group will not be randomized but will be sequential: group 1 first and then group 2.

the evaluation times are : baseline, Timmedialy, after 7 days (D7), after one month (T1M), after 2 months (T2M), after 3 months (3M) Reglementation The clinical investigation will be conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines and applicable regulatory requierement for medical device investigation, ISO 14155 Statistic Safety analyses will be performed on the SS population, while efficacy analyses will be primary performed on the ITT population. If the sample size between the PP and ITT differs by more than 10%, the efficacy analysis will also be performed on the PP population.

Evaluations criterias Clinical Grading of Efficacy Parameters Assessed with scale 10 grade -point scale (0-9) or atlas photonumeric for the items : Fine lines, Roughness , Skin tone evenness, Radiance , Plumpness, Firmness, Suppleness, Elasticity, Forehead wrinkles, Glabella wrinkles, Crow's feet wrinkles, Wrinkles on the corner of lips, Ptosis on the lower face , Nasolabial fold.

The significant change versus baseline for each item will be evaluated at each time point.

The self assessment efficacy questionnaire:

The answers to the efficacy questionnaire will be summarized in the frequency table by category , together with 100% stacked bar charts.

Safety Assessment AEs will be listed by participant including time of onset, time from the first administration of clinical investigation drug, duration, intensity, action taken, corrective therapies, outcomes, relationship to clinical investigation drug and serousness.

Th dermatologist will assess the overall tolerance on a 4-grade (Very good (1); Good (2); Moderate (3); Bad (4)) at each visits.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

130

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • New Jersey
      • Piscataway, New Jersey, États-Unis, 08854
        • Eurofins CRL

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female subjects aged between 35-60y.o
  2. Presenting all skin types
  3. Presenting all phototype according to Fitzpatrick Classification
  4. Sensitive skin (50%) - declarative
  5. Daily user of SPF30 or 50+ for at least 30 days
  6. User or not of LED masks (collected data)
  7. Mask adapted to the shape of the face
  8. Having mild to moderate scores (as indicated) for the items parameters
  9. Subjects willing not to change their face/eyes make-up removal products and habits, and shower habits (e.g. shampoo, shower gel), and make-up products (eyes and mouth) throughout the course of the study.
  10. Subjects willing to use the investigational devices and/or products on the face throughout the course of the study period
  11. Subjects taking an effective oral contraception or other methods of contraception for the duration of the study
  12. Written Informed Consent Form to participate in the study
  13. illingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects having allergy or sensitivity to LED Light
  2. Subjects having at risk of epilepsy
  3. subject who may have headaches
  4. Subjects having participated in the clinical study using anti-aging formula on the face within at least 3 months preceding the baseline visit
  5. Subjects having used any cosmetic products with exfoliating or astringing allegation on the face within at least 4 weeks preceding the baseline visit
  6. Subject with arterial circulatory disorders in the treated area,
  7. Subjects with sensitivity troubles and pain perception impairment, facial paralysis,
  8. Subjects with degenerative and vascular retinal disease,
  9. Subjects with known problems of scarring or wound healing,
  10. History of photosensitivity or photo allergy
  11. History of chronic viral infections (herpes simplex, ZONA…) and last outbreak within 12 months preceding the baseline visit
  12. Subject having an underlying dermatological disease or conditions on the face, which in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with study evaluation
  13. Subjects with a melanoma history in the family (parents or grandparents)
  14. Subjects undergone the radiotherapy in the treated areas,
  15. Subject having excessive moles, excessive pigmented spots, tattoos, scars, irritated skin, etc. at the test area that could influence the investigation
  16. Subject with a history of surgery to the treatment concerned areas within 6 months preceding the baseline visit
  17. Subject reports (or plans to) sunbath or overexpose to UV-light (mountains sports, phototherapy, tanning salon use…) for aesthetic or therapeutic reason one month before the study start (or during the study).
  18. Subject having modified their cosmetic habits (moisturizing skin care, cleansers, make-up removers, make-up, shower products, shampoo…) during the 2 weeks before baseline visit.
  19. Subject uses or has used any of the medications or topical treatments/skincare products/procedure below without relevant wash-out period before the baseline visit (or is unwilling or unable to accept to follow the wash-out period below during the study)

    -

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation séquentielle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: ARM 1 : MASK LED ALONE
Participant aged between 40 and 55 years who presents signs of photodamage on the face as well as anti-aging signs (wrinkles, complexion, luminosity)
Application of mask LED on the face, 5 times a week for 10 minutes for 3 months. The participant will apply his usual moisturizer and sunscreen
Comparateur actif: ARM2 : DEVICE + COSMETIC FORMULA
Participant aged between 40 and 55 years who presents signs of photodamage on the face as well as anti-aging signs (wrinkles, complexion, luminosity)
application of the LED mask 5 times a week during 10 minutes and the cosmetic formula twice a day for 3 months Paticipant will apply his usual moisturizer and sunscreen

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Improvement of anti-aging parameters
Délai: baseline to 3 months
The expert clinical grading will perform a standartied clinical evaluation oth the 14 anti-aging items with the scale 10 grade -point scale (0-9) or L'Oréal Skin Aging Atlas (scale photonumeric)
baseline to 3 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Global tolerance
Délai: Immediate time to 3 months
The investigator will assign an overall tolerance score at each visit using the following scale 1: very good ; 2: good ; 3: Moderate ; 4 : Bad
Immediate time to 3 months
Self assessment questionnaire
Délai: immediat time to 3 months
Participant will complete a subjective evaluation questionnaire to capture their perception of treatment outcomes. The questionnaire, using a 5 point scale (1= Disagree to 5= Agree), will include items on visible results (confort, ease of use, improvement in overall skin appereance, satisfaction)
immediat time to 3 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 avril 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 avril 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

16 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

22 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

22 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • EV 2512-1248 MASK LED

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Data confidentiality, not provided for in the consent to participation, application of the GDPR

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner