- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07663110
Tackling Resistance And HealthCare Economics Through CPE Screening (TRACE-CPE)
Multi-centre Evaluation of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) Prevalence and Transmission Dynamics, Recommendations on Screening Strategies, and Health Economics Outcomes Research Impact to Inform Policy Change
The goal of this clinical study is to learn if it is possible to reduce the spread of resistant bacteria called CPEs (Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales) between patients admitted to hospital.
CPEs can be carried in the gut of people without making them ill. Normally when patients come into hospital, they may undergo a swab test on their bottom to see if CPEs can be grown. This test can take up to 24 hours to produce a result.
The investigators want to use a faster test which takes 2 hours to produce a result, and whether this can make a difference to CPE spread between person to person.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Why do people carry, transmit or get infected with CPE?
- If a faster test was used to look for CPE, would this be better at reducing patient spread in hospital?
- Is a faster test also more cost effective?
Participants will:
- Be tested by both the usual and faster test when they come into hospital by a swab on their bottom
- Where they test positive for CPE they will be asked to answer some questions about their health
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are a significant threat to healthcare through their ability to cause drug-resistant infections. These group of bacteria posses enzymes which break down and inactivate carbapenems, a broad spectrum class of antibiotics reserved for severe infections. Transmission of CPEs between patients occur through proximity / contact within their environment in hospital - and is therefore preventable.
Within the individual, initial colonisation with CPE is an important risk factor for development of multi-drug resistant infections which are associated with significant mortality and high hospital costs. The in-hospital transmission of CPE exerts a complex burden across almost all healthcare domains - for example, CPE infection or colonisation renders common surgical antibiotic prophylaxis ineffective, increases morbidity and mortality in vulnerable patient groups such as intensive care, places burdens on the use of single occupancy beds and imposes considerable cost and disruption to care pathways through outbreaks.
Existing microbiological diagnoses of CPEs vary, but commonly involve bacterial culture of a sample such as a rectal swab in laboratory settings followed by phenotypic testing and characterisation of common antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) through molecular or immunochromatographic approaches, mostly focusing on the "big 5" mechanisms of CPE. Such testing pathways can however be time-consuming, with the median result turnaround time to be between 24-48 hours. Rapid molecular testing for CPE bypasses the bacterial culture step and may allow for robust IPC measures to be implemented in a near real-time fashion including rapid risk stratification of CPE carriage status. Where transmission is suspected, contact tracing using rapid testing early in the transmission cascade could reduce unwanted impact and be cost-effective.
The proposed study examines the utility, cost-benefit in adoption of a rapid based screening approach using rapid CPE testing coupled with an enhanced reporting workflow operating 24 hours a day, compared with existing standard practice. Given the complex interactions of AMR and CPE acquisition and transmission within hospital settings, a comprehensive approach including clinical, epidemiological and health economic costings will be utilised and modelled in order to accurately understand impact. Rapid CPE screening will be incorporated into clinical processes to minimise adverse impact and the research conducted as a pragmatic study.
The rapid test for use in this study is the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R which can detect genes in 5 most prevalent Carbapenemase gene families (including KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP and OXA classes) directly from a rectal swab sample in 50 minutes - this technology is CE-mark approved as an in vitro diagnostic and has undergone NICE technological appraisal
Research hypotheses to be addressed through the study:
- The implementation of rapid molecular CPE detection through the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R with an enhanced reporting workflow is associated with greater effectiveness and timeliness in IPC interventions, compared with the existing use of culture-based screening strategies alone. This will lead to reductions in in-hospital transmission of CPE and result in downstream effects for organisation and individuals.
- In-hospital screening strategies through rapid molecular CPE testing can be cost-effective from a health economic perspective and acceptable to patient and stakeholders, given particular clinical settings and baseline local CPE prevalence.
This is a multi-centre mixed methods research study consisting of:
- A pragmatic prospective interventional interrupted time series study to examine impact of rapid Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) diagnostics and an enhanced reporting workflow in parallel with screening on clinical practice and transmission.
- A clinical observational cohort study to characterise individual risk factors for CPE colonisation, epidemiology of colonisation including point-prevalence, and subsequent in-hospital transmission dynamics.
- A health economic modelling study utilising hospital and national data to estimate medical costs, patient experience and systems level impact of screening, CPE colonisation and acquisition
The study will take place across two hospital Trusts:
i) Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICNHT), London ii) Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London
Project 1 will implement the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R rapid test in parallel to routine culture for CPE screening at two hospital sites to understand impact on IPC practice.
Project 2 will capture transmission dynamics, healthcare cost, patient acceptability and quality of life metrics using national datasets, and de-identified healthcare data collected from Project 1. Modelling using health economics outcome research methods will be performed to evaluate CPE screening strategies for a range of scenarios and settings with a view of informing policy. Health economic costings will utilise routinely available clinical data as well as costings metrics and health related grouping code from NHS Hospital Episode Statistics.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Research Governance and Integrity
- Numéro de téléphone: 020 7594 9832
- E-mail: RGIT@imperial.ac.uk
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
London, Royaume-Uni
- Charing Cross Hospital
-
Contact:
- Medicine & Integrated Care research office
- Numéro de téléphone: +442033111234
- E-mail: imperial.admin_trustresearchcontracts@nhs.net
-
London, Royaume-Uni
- St Thomas' Hospital
-
Contact:
- R&D Governance team
- Numéro de téléphone: +442071887188
- E-mail: gstt.randd@nhs.net
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All adult (18 years or older) medical patients admitted to the acute medical unit during the implementation period who undergo routine rectal CPE testing as per local Trust policy and test positive for CPE colonisation through either the rapid test or culture-based methods.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusal for rectal screening or
- Clinical contraindication to rectal swab collection
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Diagnostique
- Répartition: N / A
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Rapid molecular screening
During the study period all eligible patients will undergo the intervention
|
Participants will undergo a rectal swab and undergo rapid molecular testing for CPE colonisation
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
In-hospital secondary transmission of CPE colonisation
Délai: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
|
The primary outcome measure is the change in secondary in-hospital CPE transmission risk with the introduction of rapid rectal CPE screening.
Quantification of transmission risk will be done using transmission dynamics modelling informed by collected clinical and epidemiological data.
|
From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Health economic outcomes of CPE colonisation, infection and screening approaches
Délai: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
|
Direct, indirect and opportunity costs associated with CPE colonisation and infection using health economic cost analysis
|
From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
|
|
Laboratory measures of diagnostic comparison
Délai: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
|
Concordance metrics between CPE rapid testing and culture including rate, genotype and species.
|
From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
|
|
Epidemiological measures of CPE colonisation
Délai: From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
|
Patient level risk factors for CPE acquisition, colonisation, and transmission.
|
From enrolment to the end of the follow up period at 12 months
|
|
Qualitative measures including public, stakeholder understanding and acceptability
Délai: 24 months
|
Perspectives on CPE diagnostic implementation, patient and provider acceptability of CPE screening through stakeholder interviews, public engagement and workshops.
|
24 months
|
|
Qualitative study on CPE perspectives through stakeholder interviews, public engagement and focused workshops
Délai: 24 months
|
This will be an adjunctive study with separate approvals process involving interviews with stakeholders to understand views and approaches to the management of CPE and detection.
These findings will feed back into the main TRACE-CPE project.
|
24 months
|
|
Point prevalence of CPE
Délai: Over the point prevalence period of 1 week
|
Prevalence of CPE colonisation derived from the number of positive CPE cases divided by the number of individuals undergoing screening.
|
Over the point prevalence period of 1 week
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Jon Otter, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Trust
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 361309
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .