Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Robotic Bronchoscopy With CBCT Image Fusion for Pulmonary Nodule Diagnosis in People Living With HIV

17 juin 2026 mis à jour par: wu qingguo

Clinical Application and Promotion of Full-Situational Awareness Bronchoscopic Robot Combined With CBCT-Based Multimodal Image Fusion for the Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Nodules in People Living With HIV: A Multicenter Open-Label Controlled Study

This multicenter study evaluates a full-situational awareness robotic bronchoscopy system combined with CBCT-based multimodal image fusion for diagnosing lung nodules in people living with HIV (PLWH).

Lung nodules are small lesions that may be benign or cancerous. In PLWH, accurate diagnosis is especially important but challenging. In this study, participants will be assigned to one of two groups:

  • Experimental group: Robotic bronchoscopy with real-time full-situational awareness and CBCT image fusion;
  • Control group: Electromagnetic navigation-guided bronchoscopy combined with radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS).

In both groups, rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) will be performed to confirm tissue adequacy. For participants confirmed to have lung cancer and meeting safety criteria, an exploratory transbronchial cryoablation will be performed during the same procedure.

The study aims to compare diagnostic accuracy and safety between the two approaches and to explore the feasibility of immediate cryoablation for early-stage lung cancer in PLWH.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Background Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Early detection and differentiation of pulmonary nodules are critical for survival. In people living with HIV (PLWH), pulmonary nodules carry a higher risk of malignancy, yet percutaneous biopsy is often contraindicated due to coagulation abnormalities or immunosuppression, and conventional bronchoscopy yields variable diagnostic rates (30%-70%) for peripheral nodules ≤3 cm. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) improves accessibility but lacks real-time intraoperative image feedback, while cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides intraoperative 3D imaging without dynamic fusion to robotic navigation. Existing robotic bronchoscopes improve stability but have limited distal fine control in complex airways.

Preclinical and early clinical data suggest that full-situational awareness bronchoscopic robots (FSABR) integrated with CBCT-based multimodal image fusion can construct a dynamically updated 3D lung model, compensate for respiratory-induced target displacement, and improve tool-in-lesion accuracy and biopsy yield. However, clinical evidence-especially in PLWH-remains lacking.

Study Design

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-group controlled trial conducted at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and collaborating centers. Eligible PLWH with pulmonary nodules ≤3 cm (malignant risk ≥50% by CT) will be randomly assigned to:

  • Experimental arm: FSABR with CBCT-based multimodal image fusion guidance for targeted biopsy;
  • Control arm: ENB-guided bronchoscopy with radial endobronchial ultrasound (r-EBUS) localization for targeted biopsy.

In both arms, rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) will be performed to confirm specimen adequacy. For participants with ROSE-confirmed malignancy meeting predefined anatomic and clinical safety criteria, exploratory transbronchial cryoablation will be performed during the same procedure. This therapeutic component is hypothesis-generating only.

Procedures Peripheral nodules will be localized by intraoperative imaging (CBCT in the experimental arm; r-EBUS in the control arm). Targeted biopsy will be performed using a 1.1-mm cryoprobe (typically 3 freeze-thaw cycles or until adequate tissue is obtained). Cryoablation (3 cycles × 12 min) will be attempted only in ROSE-positive patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer deemed suitable by the operator. Follow-up includes chest CT at post-procedure day 1 and month 1 for all patients, and additional serial CT at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months for patients undergoing cryoablation, together with HIV virologic monitoring (viral load and CD4 count).

Objectives The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic yield (proportion of cases with a definitive benign or malignant histocytologic diagnosis) between the FSABR-CBCT arm and the ENB-r-EBUS arm. Secondary objectives include: tool-in-lesion rate, nodule visualization rate, ROSE adequacy, specimen quality, procedural times, safety (pneumothorax, bleeding, infection, HIV-related events), and feasibility/safety of same-session cryoablation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for malignancy will also be calculated using final histopathology or 6-12-month imaging follow-up as reference standard.

This study is expected to provide evidence on the clinical utility of full-situational awareness robotic bronchoscopy with intraoperative CBCT fusion in a vulnerable population and to explore the feasibility of a "diagnose-and-treat" strategy for early lung cancer in PLWH.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

100

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of HIV infection; on stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) for ≥6 months with plasma HIV viral load <50 copies/mL.
  2. Presence of at least one pulmonary nodule ≤3 cm in maximum diameter on thin-section CT; radiological features suggestive of malignancy (e.g., part-solid or solid nodule with spiculation, lobulation, or vessel convergence) with estimated pretest probability of malignancy ≥50%.
  3. Age 18-70 years.
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2.
  5. Life expectancy ≥6 months.
  6. Voluntary written informed consent obtained prior to any study procedure; willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, procedures, and follow-up requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active pulmonary tuberculosis or Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia requiring acute treatment at the time of screening.
  2. Coagulation disorder: International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5 or platelet count <50 × 10^9/L.
  3. Prior definitive treatment for the target pulmonary nodule (e.g., surgical resection, radiotherapy, ablation, or systemic anti-tumor therapy).
  4. Unstable ART status: not on continuous ART or HIV viral load ≥50 copies/mL within 3 months prior to enrollment.
  5. Target lesion already diagnosed definitively by previous percutaneous biopsy or surgical pathology.
  6. Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction:

    • Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) <50% predicted; or
    • New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV heart failure.
  7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  8. Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 3 months.
  9. Inability to complete follow-up (e.g., no fixed residence, unstable contact information).
  10. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would make the participant unsuitable for enrollment or pose unacceptable risk (including significant airway abnormality preventing safe navigation).

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Diagnostique
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Bras 2
Participants undergo peripheral pulmonary nodule biopsy using electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) with radial endobronchial ultrasound (r-EBUS) localization. ROSE is performed. If ROSE confirms malignancy and safety criteria are met, exploratory transbronchial cryoablation is done in the same session. If ENB-rEBUS fails to obtain a definitive diagnosis, percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) may be used as rescue.
Expérimental: Bras 1
Participants undergo peripheral pulmonary nodule biopsy using a full-situational awareness bronchoscopic robot. Intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) and multimodal image fusion are used for real-time navigation. ROSE is performed. If ROSE confirms malignancy and safety criteria are met, exploratory transbronchial cryoablation is done in the same session. If robotic navigation fails to obtain a definitive diagnosis, percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) may be used as rescue.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Diagnostic Yield
Délai: From initial bronchoscopic biopsy through final histopathologic or 12-month imaging confirmation
Proportion of participants from whom a definitive benign or malignant diagnosis is established by histopathology (tissue or ROSE-guided cytology) or, for presumed benign lesions, by stable imaging on 6- to 12-month follow-up. Cases with inadequate specimen or indeterminate pathology are counted in the denominator but not as diagnostic successes.
From initial bronchoscopic biopsy through final histopathologic or 12-month imaging confirmation

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Tool-in-Lesion Rate
Délai: Intraoperative (at time of biopsy attempt)
Proportion of cases in which the biopsy/cryoprobe tip is confirmed to be within or in direct contact with the target pulmonary nodule by intraoperative imaging (CBCT in the experimental arm; r-EBUS in the control arm).
Intraoperative (at time of biopsy attempt)
Nodule Visualization Rate
Délai: Intraoperative
Proportion of target nodules clearly visualized intraoperatively: by CBCT in the robotic arm; by "bull's-eye" or "snowstorm" sign on r-EBUS in the control arm.
Intraoperative
ROSE Adequacy
Délai: Intraoperative
Proportion of first biopsy specimens judged as adequate (presence of atypical/suspicious/malignant cells or definitive benign elements) by rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE).
Intraoperative
Qualified Cryobiopsy Specimen Rate
Délai: Intraoperative (immediate pathologic assessment)
Proportion of cryobiopsy specimens meeting predefined quality criteria (length ≥5 mm and containing ≥3 cohesive cell clusters).
Intraoperative (immediate pathologic assessment)
Cryoablation Success (Exploratory)
Délai: Intraoperative
Among ROSE-confirmed malignant cases deemed eligible for ablation, proportion in which the cryoprobe is successfully positioned and 3 ablation cycles (12 minutes each) are completed without premature termination due to complication or technical failure.
Intraoperative
Complete / Partial Ablation Response Rate
Délai: 6 months and 12 months post-procedure
Proportion of cryoablated lesions showing complete absorption, fibrosis, or ≥50% size reduction on follow-up HRCT at 6 and 12 months. Assessed only in patients who underwent cryoablation.
6 months and 12 months post-procedure
Procedure Time
Délai: Intraoperative
Time from bronchoscope insertion to removal (total), and separately recorded: navigation time, biopsy time, and cryoablation time (if performed).
Intraoperative
Safety - Overall Adverse Event Rate
Délai: From procedure through 30 days post-procedure (through 24 months for ablated patients regarding delayed complications)
Incidence of pneumothorax, bleeding (graded mild/moderate/severe), pneumonia/fever, air embolism, and HIV-related events (viral load rebound >50 copies/mL or CD4 drop). Severity and relationship to procedure will be assessed per protocol.
From procedure through 30 days post-procedure (through 24 months for ablated patients regarding delayed complications)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juillet 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 janvier 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 mars 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

17 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

17 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

23 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

23 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

17 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner