Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Assessing Tissue Response to High-Velocity Thrust Manipulations on Capsule Length and Stiffness at the C5-C6 Facet Joint Capsule

24 août 2026 mis à jour par: Florida Gulf Coast University

Assessing Tissue Response to High-Velocity Thrust Manipulations: Measuring Lasting Changes in C5-C6 Facet Joint Capsule Length With Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and Stiffness With Elastography

This study is a quasi-experimental study collected quantitative data , with a pre-test-post-test design. Pre-intervention, baseline measurements of C5-C6 right facet joint length and width with the head of the treatment plinth downward at 45 and 90 degrees, (relative to the rest of the table) and stiffness at 90 degrees, were taken prior to applying the long-axis thrust manipulation. Post-intervention measures were taken immediately after a long axis thrust manipulation of C5-C6 and again at 24-hours after the manipulation. The baseline pre-intervention measures were then compared to the post-intervention measurements. The investigator performing the manipulation was blinded to the quantitative measurements of the ultrasound images. The ultrasound operator was blinded to the outcome of the manipulation.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Description détaillée

The study takes place in Marieb Hall rooms 101 and 103 of Florida Gulf Coast University. After meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria subjects sign the informed consent form described thoroughly on the following page. The participants undergo three recording sessions on two consecutive days. The first recording session consist of obtaining participant consent and general information, such as height and weight. The participants then has their baseline measures cervical flexion ROM, capsular length and width at both 45 and 90 degrees, and stiffness at 90 degrees, taken. The second and third session consist only of repeating these baseline measures post-manipulation and 24-hours post-manipulation respectively. Each participant will be provided a profile on the ultrasound unit, corresponding to their subject number, with each point in time having an individual exam within the profile. At these sessions, recordings are done in the prone position to measure length of the C5-C6 joint capsule and joint capsule tissue extensibility. Locating the articular pillar was a three-fold process. At the intervention table, the C7 spinous process is identified in upright sitting with palpation, due to its relevance in clinical examination and evaluation, serving as the first landmark. From this position, one of the measuring practitioners moves their finger cranially to the C6 spinous process. The participant's head is moved passively into extension, causing the spinous process to move away from the practitioner's finger, providing further confidence in location accurary. This landmark isthen marked for repeatability. The participant then has their cervical flexion range of motion measured with a fluid-filled inclinometer. A fluid-filled inclinometer utilizes gravity to quantify gross motion. This method is easily repeated and validated for clinical measurements. Each participant is given the instructions, "sit up straight and tuck your chin to your chest." At the ultrasound table, a goniometer is secured with the stationary arm in line with the table, the axis through the pivot point for the head of the table, and the moving line in line with the head of the table.

The participant is then instructed to lie prone on the table, with the head of the table positioned at 45 degrees. Anytime the head position of the table is altered, two researchers confirmed the angle of the goniometer. The 45 degree angle was selected to neutralize the natural lordosis of the lower cervical spine. The table insert is removed for the participant's face to lie within the opening. A piece of tape is placed at the base of the table opening . The participants are given the instructions, "tuck your chin and put the front of your chin on the piece of tape." From this point, the ultrasound probe is placed in a right paramedian sagittal/long-axis view. The probe was angled 15 degrees from lateral-to-medial in the posterior-to-anterior direction.

Beginning at the occipital bone, the probe is moved inferiorly. The articular pillar is known to have a jagged, sawtooth like appearance when observed from this angle. The trough at the bottom of the sawtooth indicates the inferior articular process of the cranial vertebra, while the following peak will be depicting the superior articular process of the following caudal vertebra.

This allowed the practitioners to count the peaks observed and identify the spinal levels visualized on the screen. The mark placed on the C6 spinous process is compared to probe location once the C6 level has been visualized on the screen. After the level is confirmed to be correct, the probe remained stationary on the participant. Once the correct level is visualized, the first screen capture video was taken and saved to the participant exam. The head of the table is then angled fully down towards the floor, measured at 90 degrees with the secured goniometer. By having the head of the table as far down as it allows, the process for achieving full cervical flexion remained standardized. This is also confirmed via palpation of the interspinous space of T1 and by both practitioners audibly confirming the observation of the thoracic spine flexion, indicating full cervical flexion is achieved. While the capsule could theoretically be put under more tension by utilizing multiplanar movements, utilizing only flexion offers a standardized, repeatable method that is less susceptible to confounding variables. As the probe remains stationary with the C5-C6 joint in view, the second screen capture video is taken. While remaining in the fully flexed position, the ultrasound operator start the elastography on the ultrasound unit. Once displayed on screen, a third screen capture video is taken.

The participant then returns to the initial table to receive the intervention. The practitioner performing the HVLA long axis C6-C6 manipulation on the right stands at the head of the plinth, on the right side of the patient positioned in supine. The practitioner's right hand is placed under C6, while the left hand is placed under the chin as the arm cradles the head. Using the left hand and arm, the practitioner passively rotated the head away and side-bent the head toward the targeted side. Once end-range motion is achieved, the practitioner provides a high-velocity low-amplitude long-axis thrust in a superior direction, parallel to the angle of the targeted segment.

Following the manipulation, the participant has their cervical range of motion re-measured, and the ultrasound imaging process is repeated in a new exam. Once the immediate post-intervention measures are taken, the subjects are instructed to come back for a third imaging session at the exact same time the following day. At the 24-hour follow-up, the participants cervical flexion range of motion is repeated, as well as the three ultrasound procedures.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

42

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, États-Unis, 33965
        • Florida Gulf Coast University Marieb Hall 101

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy individuals between 18-35 without neck pain
  • Able to to read and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • autoimmune disease
  • down syndrome
  • fusion, fracture
  • spinal cord compression
  • vascular pathology
  • cancer,
  • any other conditions that induce severe instability
  • inflammation
  • weakened bone.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Sample
C5-C6 long axis joint manipulation
Long axis trust manipulation C5-C6

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
facet capsule length and width
Délai: before intervention, immediately after, and at 24 hour follow up
MSK US measure facet length and with in mm
before intervention, immediately after, and at 24 hour follow up

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Cervical motion
Délai: before intervention, immediately after, and at 24 hour follow up
Max neck flexion motion in sitting measured in degrees
before intervention, immediately after, and at 24 hour follow up
elastography
Délai: Before intervention, immediately after, and 24 hours after
tissue pliability assessment with MSK US
Before intervention, immediately after, and 24 hours after

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

  • 1. Hurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Yu H, Cote P, Haldeman S. The global spine care initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Euro Spine Journ. 2018;27(1):796-801. 2. Brown S. Distracted doctoring. Springer Cham; 2017 3. Herzog W. The biomechanics of spinal manipulation. Journ Body and Move Ther. 2010;14(3):280-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.03.004 4. Olson KA. Manual Physical Therapy of the Spine. Elsevier - Health Science; 2021. 5. Pettman E. A history of manipulative therapy. Journ of Man & Manip Ther. 2007;15(3):165-174. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698107790819873 6. Giacalone A, Febbi M, Magnifica F, Ruberti E. The effect of high velocity low amplitude cervical manipulations on the musculoskeletal system: literature review. Cureus. 2020;12(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.7682 7. Young IA, Pozzi F, Dunning J, Linkonis R, Michener LA. Immediate and short-term effects of thoracic spine manipulation in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. JOSPT. 2019;49(5):299-309. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8150 8. Reggars JW. The manipulative crack. Journ Chiro Osteo Coll of Aust. 1996;5(2):39-44. doi: 9. Manning A, Butts R, Dunning J. Audible pop during spinal manipulation: plausible mechanisms and clinical relevance. AAMT. June 21, 2016. Accessed October 14, 2024. https://spinalmanipulation.org/2016/06/21/audible-popping-during-spinal-manipulation-plausible-mechanisms-and-clinical-relevance/ 10. Moorman AC. Impact of audible pops associated with spinal manipulation on perceived pain; a systematic review. Chiro and Manual Ther. 2022;30(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00454-0 11. Smith J, Finnoff JT. Diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound: Part 1. fundamentals. PM&R. 2009;1(1):64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.09.001 12. Moreno B, Barbosa J. Ultrasound-guided procedures in the cervical spine. Cureus. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20361 13. Vasiliadis ES, Grivas TB, Kaspiris A. Histo

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

4 février 2025

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juin 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 août 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

10 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

15 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

25 août 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 août 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2025-10 (Istanbul Medipol University Scientific Research Projects Commission)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

only unidentifiable data will be shared.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner