- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07713979
VisionWay Accessibility
14 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Ohio State University
VisionWay: Accessibility-Aware Path Selection for Wayfinding
The challenge of outdoor wayfinding, critical for People with Visual Impairments (PVI), consists in helping users safely walk to a pre-determined nearby destination.
The main focus of existing solutions from research and industry is to leverage the user's smartphone to receive safe moving directions either from a remote operator or smart app.
However, multiple paths may exist to connect users with their destination, each one with unique characteristics in terms of accessibility and safety.
Unfortunately, little to no attention has been paid in helping PVI decide, before even starting to walk, which path to take based on their accessibility.
Thus, a barrier identified is that the followed path may not be accessible because sidewalk features such as potholes, uncontrolled crossing, interrupted sidewalks, and objects are not known in advance.
The investigators' goal is to develop a mobile live, local, outside map framework called VisionWay, customized for PVI-user as a wayfinding tool to analyze, before starting to walk, the accessibility of candidate paths and choose one to the destination.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Recrutement
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Existing solutions include cognitive maps which can help PVI confidently walk in known locations but need to be built on experience, and thus cannot be used to determine the best path towards an unfamiliar location.
In fact, previous research has found that PVI, to reduce stress and increase safety, before embarking on a new journey need to be informed about whether a specific path has a paved sidewalk, street crossing point, controlled or uncontrolled crosswalk, stairs, obstacles, and potholes.
Knowing these characteristics ahead of time, i.e., before starting to walk, can help PVI make choices on which path to take, which is particularly beneficial in unfamiliar environments.
Trained Orientation and Mobility (O&M) specialists often provide high-quality in-person help for PVI to walk in unfamiliar areas, notifying them of upcoming obstacles and turns on the path.
However, a shortage of qualified specialists has increased the demand for remote instructors by leveraging smartphones as pointing devices.
For example, services such as TappyGuide and WeAssist work by sharing the PVI's destination as well as smartphone camera and GPS data with a remote human operator, who can then consult a map to voice-guide the PVI to their destination.
On the other hand, the remote directions depend on the availability of the remote operators.
To alleviate this dependency, new technologies leverage mobile computing and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to sense the environment for obstacles and provide real-time navigation directions through audio or haptic feedback.
For example, WeWalk's smart cane provides basic sensing and smart features to support navigation and obstacle detection alert; as part of USDOT's Inclusive Design Challenge, MPI Giudice, MPI Doore, and Co-I Fink developed the Autonomous Vehicle Assistant (AVA) app, which helps PVI safely walk towards an autonomous vehicle and accurately reach its door handle.
Some recent projects target indoor localization and navigation or leverage augmented reality and haptic feedback to aid obstacle avoidance during navigation and reduce veering.
While most funded projects focus on providing real-time navigation guidance given a certain path to follow, the reality is that more than one path may exist to reach a certain destination, especially in an outdoor context.
Thus, they cannot help PVI and remote operators choose the best path to follow, which requires creating accessibility maps.
The problem of creating accessibility maps has been widely studied for people in wheelchairs, whose main challenge is to ensure availability of accessible entrances or curbs on the path.
WheelMap is an example of such a tool, but it does not help PVI, whose definition of accessible path can be quite different.
For example, a wheelchair user may find it less problematic to handle an uncontrolled zebra crossing than someone with profound or total vision impairment.
The most related solution focusing on finding accessible paths for PVI is that of Cohen and Dalyot, which leverages accessibility information already available in OpenStreetMap to evaluate the accessibility of different paths for totally blind users.
However, it has three limitations.
First, OpenStreetMap, similar to Google Maps and Apple's Maps, does not provide important information about many harmful and beneficial sidewalk features affecting accessibility such as tactile tech, potholes, tree branches, or sidewalk restrictions.
Second, it remains unclear how to describe each path's features to PVI for selection.
Third, it only focuses on blind pedestrians while the definition of accessibility and the features affect it can vary widely across severe, profound, and totally blind PVI.The goal of this project is to involve PVI with different impairment severity and mobility aids in the development of VisionWay, a mobile/cloud framework that helps PVI select a pedestrian path towards their destination based on three main innovations.
This study focuses on the first of these by utilizing a user study designed to reveal how various sidewalk features affect accessibility and how to design an accessibility model able to estimate it.
To address this challenge, barrier, and achieve our goal, the investigators assembled a team of men, women, trainees, and members who have lived experience with vision impairment (VI).
Our strengths include engineering, computer science, human factor engineering, mixed methods research, human-computer interaction for PVI, clinicians including low vision and orientation and mobility specialists (OMS), as well as team members and participants with VI.
The investigators' goal is to develop a mobile live, local, outside map framework called VisionWay, customized for PVI-user as a wayfinding tool to analyze, before starting to walk, the accessibility of candidate paths and choose one to the destination.
The investigators designed aims for R61 technology development and feasibility.
(Aim 1) Collect survey data and observations in pilot pathways to define and validate a PVI-facing metric to measure and detect the accessibility of a walk path from static and dynamic imagery.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Estimé)
100
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Abigail Larsen, MPH
- Numéro de téléphone: 614-293-5287
- E-mail: abigail.larsen@osumc.edu
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Matt Patton
- Numéro de téléphone: 614-293-5287
- E-mail: matthew.patton@osumc.edu
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Maine
-
Orono, Maine, États-Unis, 04469
- Recrutement
- University of Maine
-
Contact:
- Nicholas Giudice, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: 207.581.2151
- E-mail: Nicholas.giudice@maine.edu
-
Contact:
- Justin Brown
- Numéro de téléphone: 207.581.2151
- E-mail: justin.r.brown@osumc.edu
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, États-Unis, 43212
- Recrutement
- Ohio State University
-
Contact:
- Abigail Larsen, MPH
- Numéro de téléphone: 614-406-4423
- E-mail: abigail.larsen@osumc.edu
-
Contact:
- Matthew Patton
- Numéro de téléphone: 614-293-5287
- E-mail: matthew.patton@osumc.edu
-
Chercheur principal:
- Sayoko Moroi, MD, PhD
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years old
- Able to provide informed consent
- Vision worse than 20/200, encompassing PVI with severe and profound impairment as well as total blindness.
Group 1 Inclusion:
- PVI meeting general inclusion criteria and without mobility aids
Group 2 Inclusion:
- PVI meeting general inclusion criteria and who use a cane as a mobility aid
Group 3 Inclusion:
- PVI meeting general inclusion criteria and who use guide dogs.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conditions that prevent safe ambulation that include, but are not limited to, neuromuscular disorder, post-operative state (such as orthopedic surgeries or cardiac surgeries), balance issues, history of falls in the last 6 months, or at the discretion of the investigator.
- Use of walker or wheelchair
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Autre
- Répartition: N / A
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Recorded walks
The study team will record videos of a subset of users walking on selected paths on campus.
Participants may be presented with the maps ahead of the walk.
Such videos may include video recordings from the perspective of the study team monitoring the participant.
Additionally, personal recording devices such as GoPro/action cameras, or recording eyeglasses may be provided to the participant to record walks from their perspective.
From the preselected paths, the set and order will be randomized between participants.
The study team will prompt participants after each path to identify and describe path features that affect accessibility, as well as to provide a perceived accessibility score (on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is highly accessible).
The video recording may include audio description of these relevant sidewalk features and the score.
The research team member will record their observations of the walking paths as well.
|
Participants will be asked to walk a defined pathway through campus.
From the preselected paths, the set and order will be randomized between participants.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
PVI accessibility on sidewalks
Délai: For a period over 2 hours
|
Primary objectives are to collect prospective data in PVI groups to define which sidewalk features affect accessibility and how to design an accessibility model able to estimate accessibility.
Twenty sidewalk (path) features were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not important, 5 = very important), and participants indicated the number of additional minutes they would be willing to walk to access a route containing each feature (5-point scale. 1 = up to one minute, to 5 = five or more minutes).
A combined score for each feature was determined by summing the two values (for each feature) to generate an overall priority ranking.
Higher scores indicate a greater perceived importance.
|
For a period over 2 hours
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Directeur d'études: Marco Brocanelli, PhD, Ohio State University
- Chercheur principal: Sayoko Moroi, MD, PhD, Ohio State University
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
26 février 2026
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
1 septembre 2027
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
1 septembre 2027
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
9 juillet 2026
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
14 juillet 2026
Première publication (Réel)
20 juillet 2026
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
20 juillet 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
14 juillet 2026
Dernière vérification
1 juillet 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- STUDY20251838
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
INDÉCIS
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .