Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Clear Aligners vs Fixed Appliances for Molar Distalization Using Infrazygomatic Crest Screws

15 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Ahmet Yağcı, TC Erciyes University

Evaluation of the Treatment Effects of Different Clear Aligner and Fixed Appliance Systems in Maxillary Posterior Distalization Using Infrazygomatic Crest Screws: An In-Vivo Randomized Clinical Study

This study compares three different methods of moving upper back teeth backward (distalization) to create space for crowded or protruding teeth, all supported by small temporary screws placed in the cheekbone area (infrazygomatic crest screws). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three treatment types: traditional fixed braces (Pitts21 system), Invisalign clear aligners, or ClearCorrect clear aligners. The study measures how effectively each method moves the back teeth, how long treatment takes, and how comfortable and practical each method is for patients. The goal is to help orthodontists and patients choose the most effective and efficient treatment option for this type of tooth movement.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This prospective randomized clinical trial included 35 subjects aged 13-18 years with skeletal Class I, dental Class II malocclusion, randomly allocated to Pitts21 fixed appliance (n=12), Invisalign (n=12), or ClearCorrect (n=11) treatment groups. Unilateral or bilateral infrazygomatic crest (IZC) miniscrews were placed in all subjects, and distalization forces were applied via intraoral elastics. Lateral cephalometric radiographs and digital dental models (acquired with a 3Shape TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner) were obtained at the start (T0) and end (T1) of distalization to assess skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes. Patient-reported outcomes were also collected, including pain (Visual Analog Scale) and anxiety (Çapa Anxiety Scale). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS v23 and R 4.4.1; normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Between-group comparisons used one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis H test, and within-group comparisons over time used paired t-test, Wilcoxon, repeated measures ANOVA, or Friedman test. Group×time and group×tooth interactions were evaluated using Generalized Estimating Equations and Robust Mixed ANOVA, with Bonferroni, Games-Howell, or Holm corrections applied for multiple comparisons.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

37

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Kayseri, Turquie (Türkiye), 38000
        • Erciyes University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Skeletal Class I (ANB angle 0-4°), dental Class II malocclusion treatable with molar distalization
  • Need for unilateral or bilateral distalization of the first molars in the range of 2-4.5 mm
  • Chronological age between 13 and 18 years, regardless of skeletal age
  • Normal or hypodivergent growth pattern (SN-GoGn < 39°)
  • Mild to moderate maxillary crowding (less than 6 mm) and minimal or no mandibular crowding (less than 3 mm)
  • No previously extracted maxillary teeth, excluding third molars
  • Erupted permanent second molars
  • Good oral hygiene
  • Healthy periodontal tissues

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for orthodontic tooth extraction or functional appliance therapy
  • Presence of systemic disease
  • Congenital or acquired craniofacial deformity involving the condyle or mandible
  • Poor patient cooperation
  • History of allergy to any metal
  • Pre-existing root resorption prior to treatment
  • Previous orthodontic treatment
  • Abnormal position, depth of impaction, or close proximity to adjacent anatomical structures (sinus, neurovascular structures) of the maxillary third molar that would make its surgical extraction risky

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Group A ( Pitts21® Fixed Appliance )
Participants received maxillary posterior distalization using the Pitts21® fixed orthodontic appliance system, anchored with infrazygomatic crest (IZC) miniscrews and intraoral elastics for distalization force.
Fixed orthodontic brackets (Pitts21 system) used for maxillary posterior distalization, anchored with infrazygomatic crest miniscrews and intraoral elastics.
Autres noms:
  • Fixed orthodontic bracket system
Expérimental: Group B ( Invisalign® clear aligners)
Participants received maxillary posterior distalization using Invisalign® clear aligners, anchored with infrazygomatic crest (IZC) miniscrews and intraoral elastics for distalization force.
Clear aligner system (Invisalign) used for maxillary posterior distalization, anchored with infrazygomatic crest miniscrews and intraoral elastics.
Autres noms:
  • Invisalign Clear Aligner System
Expérimental: Group C ( ClearCorrect® clear aligners)
Participants received maxillary posterior distalization using ClearCorrect® clear aligners, anchored with infrazygomatic crest (IZC) miniscrews and intraoral elastics for distalization force.
Clear aligner system (ClearCorrect) used for maxillary posterior distalization, anchored with infrazygomatic crest miniscrews and intraoral elastics.
Autres noms:
  • ClearCorrect Clear Aligner System

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Amount of Maxillary Posterior Tooth Distalization
Délai: From the date of infrazygomatic crest miniscrew placement and initiation of distalization force (T0) until the end of the active distalization phase (T1), assessed up to 13 months
The amount of distalization of the maxillary premolars and molars (U4, U5, U6, U7) was measured in millimeters using three-dimensional digital dental model analysis, comparing pre-treatment (T0) and post-distalization (T1) records.
From the date of infrazygomatic crest miniscrew placement and initiation of distalization force (T0) until the end of the active distalization phase (T1), assessed up to 13 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Total Distalization Duration
Délai: From the date of miniscrew placement and start of distalization force (T0) until the date of completion of active distalization (T1), assessed up to 13 months
The total duration of the distalization phase, calculated as the time interval between the start of force application (T0) and the completion of active distalization (T1).
From the date of miniscrew placement and start of distalization force (T0) until the date of completion of active distalization (T1), assessed up to 13 months

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Distalization Efficacy in Clear Aligner Groups
Délai: From treatment planning (T0) until the end of active distalization (T1), assessed up to 13 months
Distalization efficacy was calculated as the ratio of achieved to planned tooth movement (Efficacy = Achieved/Planned × 100), based on digital treatment planning, for the Invisalign and ClearCorrect groups.
From treatment planning (T0) until the end of active distalization (T1), assessed up to 13 months
Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrew Success Rate
Délai: From the date of miniscrew placement until the end of active distalization, assessed up to 13 months
The success rate of infrazygomatic crest miniscrews used for anchorage was recorded, defined as the proportion of miniscrews remaining stable and functional throughout the distalization period without requiring replacement.
From the date of miniscrew placement until the end of active distalization, assessed up to 13 months
Cephalometric Skeletal, Dental, and Soft Tissue Changes
Délai: From the date of miniscrew placement and start of distalization force (T0) until the end of active distalization (T1), assessed up to 13 months
Skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes were assessed using lateral cephalometric radiographs, comparing measurements obtained at the beginning (T0) and end (T1) of distalization.
From the date of miniscrew placement and start of distalization force (T0) until the end of active distalization (T1), assessed up to 13 months
Rotation of Premolars and Molars During Distalization
Délai: From T0 to T1, assessed up to 13 months
Changes in the rotational position of the maxillary premolars and molars (U4-U7) were measured using digital dental models, comparing T0 and T1 records.
From T0 to T1, assessed up to 13 months
Mesiodistal Tipping of Premolars and Molars During Distalization
Délai: From T0 to T1, assessed up to 13 months
Changes in mesiodistal crown angulation (tipping) of the maxillary premolars and molars (U4-U7) were measured using digital dental models, comparing T0 and T1 records.
From T0 to T1, assessed up to 13 months
Transverse Width Changes in the Maxillary Posterior Region
Délai: From T0 to T1, assessed up to 13 months
Changes in transverse arch width at the level of the premolars and molars (U4-U7) were measured using digital dental models, comparing T0 and T1 records.
From T0 to T1, assessed up to 13 months
Pain Level Assessed by Visual Analog Scale
Délai: From day 1 after miniscrew placement/appliance activation up to the end of active distalization, assessed at 5 time points (day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and end of distalization; up to 13 months)
Pain associated with treatment was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) at multiple time points: day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and end of distalization.
From day 1 after miniscrew placement/appliance activation up to the end of active distalization, assessed at 5 time points (day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and end of distalization; up to 13 months)
Anxiety Level Assessed by the Çapa Anxiety Scale
Délai: From day 1 after miniscrew placement/appliance activation up to the end of active distalization, assessed at 5 time points (day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and end of distalization; up to 13 months)
Patient anxiety related to treatment was assessed using the Çapa Anxiety Scale at multiple time points: day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and end of distalization.
From day 1 after miniscrew placement/appliance activation up to the end of active distalization, assessed at 5 time points (day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and end of distalization; up to 13 months)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

6 juin 2024

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

12 janvier 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

18 février 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

15 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

15 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

20 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

20 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

15 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner