Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Diagnostic Accuracy and Operational Efficiency of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Long Bone Fractures: A Brazilian Multicenter Study (POCUS-BONE BR)

21 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Emanuel Ayrton Balanga, University of Sao Paulo

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for identifying long bone fractures in the emergency department.

Traditionally, suspected long bone fractures are diagnosed using X-rays. While effective, X-rays require transporting patients to a radiology suite, involve exposure to ionizing radiation, and can contribute to longer emergency room wait times. POCUS is a portable, radiation-free imaging tool that physicians perform directly at the patient's bedside. The investigators hypothesize that POCUS can accurately identify or rule out long bone fractures when compared to standard X-rays, and that its use will reduce the time required to make clinical decisions.

This is a multicenter, prospective observational study. Participants arriving at the emergency department with a suspected long bone fracture will undergo a bedside ultrasound examination performed by a trained emergency physician. Following the ultrasound, all participants will receive standard-of-care X-ray imaging.

Researchers will compare the initial POCUS findings to the final X-ray results (the reference standard) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound. Additionally, the study will measure operational timelines-including time to diagnosis, time to treatment decision, and total length of stay in the emergency department-to assess the impact of POCUS on hospital workflow and patient care efficiency.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Description détaillée

## Background and Rationale

Long bone fractures are among the most frequent traumatic injuries managed in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide. The current standard of care for diagnosing these fractures is plain radiography (X-ray). While highly effective and widely available, the standard radiological workflow presents several challenges in crowded ED environments. It requires patient transport to a radiology suite-which can exacerbate pain in trauma patients-involves exposure to ionizing radiation, and often contributes to significant delays in clinical decision-making and overall length of stay (LOS).

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a rapid, portable, and radiation-free imaging modality that can be performed directly at the patient's bedside. Previous single-center studies have suggested that POCUS has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fractures. However, there is a lack of robust, multicenter data evaluating its real-world implementation in diverse Brazilian emergency settings. The POCUS-BONE BR study aims to fill this gap by assessing both the diagnostic accuracy and the operational impact of integrating musculoskeletal POCUS into the standard trauma workflow.

## Study Objectives

**Primary Objective:** To determine the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) of bedside POCUS performed by emergency physicians for the detection of long bone fractures, using standard plain radiography as the reference standard.

**Secondary Objectives:**

  • To evaluate operational efficiency by comparing time-to-diagnosis and time-to-disposition between the POCUS evaluation and standard radiological workflows.
  • To assess patient pain levels during the POCUS examination compared to standard X-ray positioning, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
  • To determine the inter-observer agreement between the emergency physician's POCUS interpretation and the formal radiologist's X-ray report.

    • Study Design and Methodology

POCUS-BONE BR is a prospective, multicenter, observational diagnostic accuracy study. It will be conducted across [Insert Number] participating emergency departments in Brazil.

Eligible patients presenting to the ED with clinical signs of a suspected long bone fracture (involving the femur, tibia, fibula, humerus, radius, or ulna) will be enrolled consecutively. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants or their legal representatives prior to enrollment.

  • Study Procedures

    1. **Initial Assessment:** Upon ED arrival and triage, patients with suspected long bone fractures will undergo standard clinical evaluation.
    2. **POCUS Examination:** An emergency physician trained in musculoskeletal ultrasound will perform a targeted bedside POCUS examination of the affected limb. The physician will document the presence or absence of a fracture, the fracture type (e.g., cortical disruption), and the time of examination completion.
    3. **Reference Standard Imaging:** Following the POCUS exam, all patients will undergo standard plain radiography of the affected extremity as dictated by standard clinical care.
    4. **Blinding:** The emergency physician performing the POCUS will be blinded to the subsequent X-ray results. The radiologist or attending orthopedist interpreting the definitive X-ray will be blinded to the POCUS findings.
    5. **Clinical Management:** Patient care, analgesia, and orthopedic consultation will proceed according to institutional protocols and will not be delayed by study procedures.
  • Data Collection and Metrics

Trained researchers will collect clinical and operational data using a standardized electronic case report form (eCRF) via [e.g., REDCap]. Key time-stamps recorded will include:

  • Time of ED triage.
  • Time of POCUS completion.
  • Time of X-ray completion.
  • Time to definitive medical decision/orthopedic consultation.
  • Total ED Length of Stay (LOS).

    • Statistical Analysis Plan

Diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals using standard 2x2 contingency tables. The agreement between POCUS and X-ray findings will be evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Continuous variables (such as time-to-diagnosis and LOS) will be assessed for normality. Parametric data will be analyzed using Student's t-test, and non-parametric data using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The planned sample size of [Insert Target Sample Size] patients was calculated to achieve a [Insert Power, e.g., 90%] power to detect a sensitivity of at least [Insert Percentage, e.g., 90%] with a predefined margin of error.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

260

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Emanuel A Balanga, Medical Doctor
  • Numéro de téléphone: +55 11 965011440
  • E-mail: eabalanga@gmail.com

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

The study population consists of adult patients (18 years of age or older) presenting to the emergency departments of two major Brazilian academic hospitals: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP) and Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (HCFAMEMA). Eligible participants are those seeking care for acute extremity trauma with clinical suspicion of a long bone fracture, characterized by signs such as localized pain, visible deformity, swelling, or functional limitation. Patients presenting with open fractures, hemodynamic instability requiring immediate resuscitation, known previous fractures in the same anatomical segment, or those requiring immediate surgical intervention are excluded from this study population.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years or older;
  • Presenting with clinical suspicion of a long bone fracture (pain, deformity, swelling, or functional limitation);
  • Provision of informed consent (signed Informed Consent Form - ICF).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with open fractures;
  • Hemodynamic instability (resuscitation priority);
  • Known previous fractures in the same bone segment;
  • Need for immediate surgical intervention;
  • Refusal to participate.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Arm A
POCUS performed before radiography
Arm B
Radiography performed before POCUS

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Sensitivity of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Detection of Long Bone Fractures
Délai: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours.
Sensitivity is the percentage of participants with a long bone fracture confirmed by the reference standard (conventional radiography independently interpreted by a blinded radiologist) who were correctly classified as having a fracture by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by a trained emergency physician. Sensitivity is calculated as the number of true positive POCUS examinations divided by the total number of participants with a fracture on the reference standard, multiplied by 100. Reported as a percentage with a 95 percent confidence interval.
From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Positive Predictive Value of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Detection of Long Bone Fractures
Délai: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours
Positive predictive value is the percentage of participants with a positive point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examination who have a long bone fracture confirmed by the reference standard (conventional radiography independently interpreted by a blinded radiologist). It is calculated as the number of true positive POCUS examinations divided by the total number of positive POCUS examinations, multiplied by 100. Reported as a percentage with a 95 percent confidence interval.
From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours
Negative Predictive Value of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Detection of Long Bone Fractures
Délai: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours
Negative predictive value is the percentage of participants with a negative point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examination who have no long bone fracture on the reference standard (conventional radiography independently interpreted by a blinded radiologist). It is calculated as the number of true negative POCUS examinations divided by the total number of negative POCUS examinations, multiplied by 100. Reported as a percentage with a 95 percent confidence interval.
From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours
Overall Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Detection of Long Bone Fractures
Délai: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours
Overall diagnostic accuracy is the percentage of participants correctly classified by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), calculated as the sum of true positive and true negative POCUS examinations divided by the total number of participants assessed, multiplied by 100. The reference standard is conventional radiography independently interpreted by a blinded radiologist. Reported as a percentage with a 95 percent confidence interval.
From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours
Interobserver Agreement Between Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Operators
Délai: From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours
Agreement between two independent point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) operators regarding the presence or absence of a long bone fracture, measured by the Cohen kappa coefficient. Kappa values range from -1 to 1, where 1 indicates perfect agreement, 0 indicates agreement equivalent to chance, and negative values indicate agreement worse than chance. Reported as a kappa coefficient with a 95 percent confidence interval.
From emergency department arrival to completion of the reference standard radiography, assessed up to 24 hours
Time From Emergency Department Arrival to Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Result
Délai: From emergency department arrival to establishment of the fracture diagnosis, assessed up to 24 hours
Time elapsed between emergency department arrival and the moment the point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examination result is available to the treating team, reported in minutes.
From emergency department arrival to establishment of the fracture diagnosis, assessed up to 24 hours
Time From Emergency Department Arrival to Radiography Report Availability
Délai: From emergency department arrival to establishment of the fracture diagnosis, assessed up to 24 hours
Time elapsed between emergency department arrival and the moment the conventional radiography report is available to the treating team, reported in minutes.
From emergency department arrival to establishment of the fracture diagnosis, assessed up to 24 hours
Emergency Department Length of Stay
Délai: From emergency department arrival to emergency department discharge, assessed up to 72 hours
Total time elapsed between emergency department arrival and emergency department exit (hospital admission, transfer to another facility, or discharge home), reported in hours.
From emergency department arrival to emergency department discharge, assessed up to 72 hours

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

19 octobre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

20 septembre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

20 novembre 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

15 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

27 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

27 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 8.574.218
  • Universal Trial Number (UTN) (Autre identifiant: U1111-1261-1912)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to maintain absolute patient confidentiality, as mandated by the study's Informed Consent Form. All participant data and imaging findings will be de-identified and tracked solely by alphanumeric codes. Furthermore, the dataset will remain restricted to the primary research team and stored securely using the institutional REDCap platform and encrypted local backup drives

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner