Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Applying Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Treating Severe Substance Use Disorder: Tolerability and Effectiveness

30 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: National Taiwan University Hospital

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of applying low-intensity focused ultrasound targeting the nucleus accumbens in individuals with opioid or amphetamine use disorders. The main questions it aims to answer is:

- Low-intensity focused ultrasound targeting the nucleus accumbens demonstrates sufficient safety and predictable therapeutic efficacy in individuals with opioid or amphetamine use disorders.

Participants will:

  • Received Low-intensity focused ultrasound neuromodulation once
  • Visit the clinic for checkups and asessment at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years after received Low-intensity focused ultrasound neuromodulation.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

60

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • Taïwan
      • Taipei, Taïwan, 100229
        • Recrutement
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets the DSM-5 criteria for opioid use disorder or amphetamine use disorder, with a severity level of severe, and does not currently meet the criteria for in sustained remission;
  • Within 7 days prior to the screening assessment, the participant must have been receiving a stable dose of medication treatment, such as methadone, buprenorphine/naloxone, or naltrexone;
  • Within 7 days prior to the screening assessment, the participant must have abstained from illicit substances and alcohol, and must have a negative urine drug test;
  • The bilateral nucleus accumbens must be clearly identifiable on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such that they are sufficient for treatment targeting and for indirect measurement from other anatomical structures;
  • The participant must be able to communicate effectively and express their feelings and experiences during the study procedures;
  • The participant must be willing to comply with the study requirements, including adherence to prescribed medications and cooperation with study visits and assessments.

(The participant must have the capacity to make independent medical decisions, as determined by the clinical team.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of neurological disorders or major psychiatric disorders, such as acute-phase schizophrenia spectrum disorder, acute-phase bipolar disorder, acute-phase major depressive disorder, severe cognitive impairment, or recent suicidal ideation or plan;
  • Antisocial personality disorder;
  • Occurrence of major physical health problems within 6 months prior to the trial, including: Cardiovascular or hemodynamic abnormalities, such as heart failure, arrhythmia, tachycardia or bradycardia (>100 bpm or <60 bpm), abnormal systolic blood pressure (>180 mmHg or <90 mmHg), or abnormal diastolic blood pressure (>180 mmHg); Platelet or coagulation abnormalities (INR > 1.5) or current use of medications that may cause anticoagulation, such as warfarin or Avastin; Renal dysfunction (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²) or ongoing hemodialysis; Severe infection; Immunocompromised status; History of intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial aneurysm, cerebrovascular events within the past 6 months, or brain tumor; Neurological diseases, such as stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, dementia, or related disorders; Any other physical illness that, based on clinical evaluation, may pose a significant risk to physical function or life during treatment.
  • Participants who, upon evaluation, are deemed unsuitable for MR-guided focused ultrasound treatment, including those with a low skull density ratio (<0.4), intracranial implants, or energy-absorbing structures or sensitive tissues along the ultrasound beam path that cannot be avoided (such as prior ventriculoperitoneal shunt sites, surgical metal clips, significant calcifications, extensive scarring, or any rigid implants). During the pre-treatment evaluation, a head CT scan will be performed to determine whether the skull density ratio is suitable for focused ultrasound treatment. Based on prior theoretical evidence, an excessively low skull density ratio may reduce the efficiency of MR-guided focused ultrasound and increase the risk of adverse effects, and therefore such participants are considered unsuitable for focused ultrasound treatment.
  • Structural abnormality of either side of the nucleus accumbens;
  • Contraindications to MRI, such as claustrophobia, allergy to MRI contrast agents, or the presence of metallic implants incompatible with MRI;
  • Contraindications to PET imaging, such as allergy to radiopharmaceutical contrast agents;
  • Inability to comply with trial-related instructions, lack of legal/behavioral capacity, or lack of motivation to receive treatment;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Scalp atrophy or poor wound healing of the scalp;
  • Any other condition that, in the physician's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for enrollment in the clinical trial.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Groupe expérimental
Dispositif: Low-intensity focused ultrasound
transcranially deliver focal energy into the accumbens nucleus in the brain
Comparateur factice: Groupe de contrôle
Dispositif: false stimulus
false stimulus

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Substance craving intensity
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Using visual analogue scale (VAS) to measure craving intensity, higher score shows greater craving for substance
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Urinalysis
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year after treatment
Whether urine screening tests are positive for opioids and amphetamines. The intervention will be considered effective if the positivity rate decreases by 50% one month after the intervention compared with the time of intervention.
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year after treatment
Severity of Dependence
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Using Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) to measure craving intensity, higher score shows greater severity of Dependence
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Stimulant Relapse Risk
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Using Stimulant Relapse Risk Scale (SRRS) to measure craving intensity, higher score shows higher stimulant relapse risk
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Mental health state
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to measure participants' mental health state, greater scores of these scales shows worse mental health state.
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Executive function assessment
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Using Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) to assess how well executive function of participants is.
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Neuropsychological function assessment
Délai: Before intervention, three months, six months, a year, two year after treatment
Using Cambridge Gambling Task (CGT) to assess Neuropsychological function since the intervention is to nucleus accumbens and could potentially affect Neuropsychological function.
Before intervention, three months, six months, a year, two year after treatment
functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Délai: Before intervention, 24hours, a month, three months after treatment
Because the nucleus accumbens, the intervention target, may be involved in craving, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will be used to assess changes in brain activation during the craving task before and after treatment.
Before intervention, 24hours, a month, three months after treatment
Positron Emission Tomography
Délai: Before intervention, a month after treatment
Because neuromodulation may affect metabolic activity in the nucleus accumbens, positron emission tomography (PET) will be used to measure cerebral metabolism and compare changes before and after the intervention.
Before intervention, a month after treatment
Anxiety state
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Using Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire(GAD-7) to measure participants' anxiety state, greater scores of these scales shows worse anxiety state.
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Depression state
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), to measure participants' mental health state, greater scores of these scales shows worse depression state.
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Attendtion state
Délai: Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Using Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) to assess how well attention state of participants is.
Before intervention, one week, a month, three months, six months, nine months, a year, one and half year and two years after treatment
Working memory capacity
Délai: Before intervention, three months, six months, a year, two year after treatment
Using N-back test to assess working memory capacity since the intervention is to nucleus accumbens and could potentially affect Neuropsychological function.
Before intervention, three months, six months, a year, two year after treatment

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

National Taiwan University Hospital

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 janvier 2025

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 décembre 2030

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 décembre 2030

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

12 mars 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

29 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

31 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 202404026DINC

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner