Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

NEUROphysiology of CRACK Use Disorder in ITaly (NEURO-CRACK-IT)

28 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Giuseppe Maniaci, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Palermo

Efficacy of a Neurofeedback Protocol for Crack Cocaine Users in Residential Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to verify if a Scott-Kaiser neurofeedback protocol can improve inhibitory control, reduce craving, and enhance treatment adherence in individuals with crack cocaine use disorder.

The main research question is: does a 30-session, multi-phase neurofeedback intervention lead to better clinical outcomes, resulting in a more significant stabilization of the therapeutic pathway and reduction in relapse and drop-out rates, compared to treatment as usual (TAU) alone?

Participants will:

  • Undergo initial assessment (T0) including psychological questionnaires, a computerized cognitive task, and quantitative EEG (qEEG) recording.
  • Be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either receive 30 sessions of a modified Scott-Kaiser neurofeedback intervention (Experimental Group) or receive standard care alone (Control Group).
  • Complete the neurofeedback training (Experimental Group), which consists of 1 daily sessions of approximately 45 minutes divided into an initial Beta-SMR phase (5-10 sessions) and an advanced Alpha-Theta phase (20 sessions).
  • Undergo post-treatment assessment at approximately 30-45 days (T1) including psychological questionnaires, the cognitive task and qEEG.
  • A follow-up assessement 4-weeks after the end of the treatment including the same psychological questionnaires, cognitive task and qEEG (T2).

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Chronic crack cocaine use represents one of the most severe forms of substance use disorder, characterized by rapid onset, high compulsivity, and elevated relapse rates. Chronic consumption is known to induce profound neurobiological alterations in fronto-striatal circuits and disrupt dopaminergic regulation, particularly within reward systems and mechanisms of inhibitory control. This interplay between neurophysiology, clinical psychopathology, and systemic biological responses highlights the necessity for multidimensional treatment models. While traditional psychosocial and pharmacological interventions show limited efficacy for this specific population, qEEG-guided neurofeedback has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique. By providing real-time feedback of neural activity, neurofeedback allows participants to learn brain autoregulation strategies, promoting neuroplasticity and enhancing cognitive and emotional control. This study focuses on a specific neurofeedback training program implementing the Scott-Kaiser modification of the Peniston Alpha-Theta protocol. This approach suggests that targeted training of distinct cortical rhythms can directly modulate clinical symptoms such as impulsivity and craving. While preliminary evidence supports the use of EEG biofeedback in addiction, there is a critical need for rigorous, randomized controlled designs to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of this protocol on both neurophysiological patterns and objective behavioral outcomes in crack cocaine users.

Participants will be recruited from individuals hospitalized for crack cocaine use at the Short-Stay Accommodation Center (Centro di Pronta Accoglienza) of the ASP Palermo. It is planned to enroll a total sample of 104 participants (aged 18-55 years, stratified for sex and age). For initial assessment, interested subjects will be evaluated by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders (SCID-5, incorporating the CV and PD modules), to operationalize psychiatric diagnoses and substance use profiles. Following the initial assessment and confirmation of eligibility, subjects will be randomized via an automated electronic system with allocation concealment to either the Experimental group or the Control group (1:1 ratio).

All experimental and training sessions will occur in a controlled setting within the laboratory.

  • Neurophysiological parameters include qEEG spectral power analyses in the theta, alpha, SMR and beta bands, the beta/alpha and theta/beta ratios.
  • Behavioral and cognitive parameters include inhibitory control evaluated by a computerized Go/No-Go task, included in BFE-A battery.
  • Psychological assessment included: encompass current craving intensity (SCQ-NOW) and general psychopathology (GAD-7, PHQ-9).

Upon arrival (T0 - Baseline, executed within 72 hours of admission across two dedicated days), initial psychometric and behavioral parameters will be collected. Resting-state qEEG parameters will be recorded using the DigiTrack 32-channel system to establish neurophysiological baselines. Subsequently, participants will enter their assigned parallel arms for the duration of the institutional stay.

The Experimental group will receive standard institutional care (TAU) combined with 30 sessions of the modified Scott-Kaiser neurofeedback protocol, delivered via the DigiTrack system with interactive audiovisual feedback. This intervention is structured into two sequential phases at a rate of 1 daily sessions (45 minutes): Phase I consists of 5-10 sessions of Beta/SMR training to enhance cortical regulation and attentional control, followed by Phase II, consisting of 20 sessions of Alpha-Theta training focused on emotional regulation and craving reduction. The Control group will receive standard institutional TAU alone. The same assessment will be implemented at the end of the intervention protocol (T1) and at a 4 weeks follow-up (T2).

This research aims to provide robust evidence on the efficacy of a multi-phase Scott-Kaiser neurofeedback protocol as a complementary tool for crack cocaine use disorder. Understanding these specific neurobiological and psychological shifts can inform the integration of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques within public health addiction services (SerD). By utilizing a randomized controlled design, the study aims to differentiate the specific neuroplastic and cognitive benefits of targeted EEG biofeedback from the general outcomes of standard clinical care. The findings may contribute to a broader scientific understanding of how targeted brain training influences autonomic cortical regulation and behavioral control, ultimately facilitating the adherence at the TAU, reducing craving and increasing inhibitory control, finally increasing the possibility to an occupational reintegration for recovering individuals.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

104

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Palermo
      • Palermo, Palermo, Italie, 90100
        • Centro di Pronta Accoglienza Dipendenze Patologiche

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aging between 18 and 55;
  • Able to understand the study protocols and provide written informed consent;
  • Currently admitted or hospitalized at the Short-Stay Accommodation Center (Centro di Pronta Accoglienza) of ASP Palermo (Pisani site) for crack cocaine use.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of neurological conditions, including traumatic brain injury with neurological sequelae, uncontrolled epilepsy, previous stroke with significant residual cognitive or motor deficits, or active encephalitis.
  • Severe unstable medical conditions that contraindicate the application of electroencephalography (EEG) or venous blood sampling.
  • Current pregnancy.
  • Inability to fully comprehend the study information or express a valid, autonomous written informed consent.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Neurofeedback (NF)
Participants will be seated in a controlled laboratory setting. This neuromodulation technique, rooted in quantitative EEG (qEEG)-guided conditioning which actively utilizes real-time neurophysiological feedback, involves multi-channel skull electrode placement and advanced software processing. It is specifically aimed at promoting cortical regulation and facilitating cognitive-emotional stabilization across distinct training phases throughout the clinical protocol, enhancing targeted neural oscillatory patterns. Selected interactive audiovisual scenarios accompany the session. The intervention will be delivered alongside standard institutional care (TAU)
The neurofeedback training protocol will consist of 25-30 sessions (1 daily sessions, lasting 45 minutes each), structured into an initial Phase I (5-10 sessions of Beta/SMR training) targeting attentional and inhibitory control, and a Phase II (20 sessions of Alpha-Theta training) focused on emotional regulation and craving reduction.
Aucune intervention: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
This group is designed to provide the clinical comparative baseline of standard care. Participants will receive standard multi-disciplinary institutional care provided by the clinical facility, while undergoing identical diagnostic, psychometric, and laboratory timelines used in the experimental group. This care is deliberately non-specific to neurophysiological brain-training and contrasts with the targeted quantitative EEG-guided operant conditioning provided to the experimental group. Participants in this group will not receive neurofeedback training sessions. The TAU protocol will span the same duration of the treatment in the Experimental group

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Behavioral Inhibitory Control and Cue Reactivity
Délai: Baseline (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 30-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).
Assessed with the computerized Modified Go/No-Go Task (MGNGT) from the Executive Functions Battery in Addiction (BFE-A), which incorporates both neutral and drug-related stimuli. The metrics evaluated include the number of commission errors, reflecting motor impulsivity and failure of inhibition, number of omission errors, and reaction times measured in milliseconds. Higher scores in commission errors indicate poorer inhibitory control.
Baseline (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 30-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).
Neurophysiological Cortical Regulation (Resting-State qEEG Spectral Power)
Délai: (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 40-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).
Assessed via quantitative EEG (qEEG) data recorded through the DigiTrack 32-channel system at the Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders Laboratory . Specific neurophysiological metrics include absolute and relative spectral power within the theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (13-30 Hz) and sensorimotor rhythm (SMR, 12-15 Hz) frequency bands, alongside the calculation of the frontal theta/beta and alpha/theta ratios, which serve as neurofisiological markers of cortical arousal and vulnerability to craving.
(T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 40-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Treatment Adherence and Retention
Délai: Up to 4 weeks post-discharge (T2).
Assessed with the institutional tracking of treatment dropout rates, defined as the proportion of participants who prematurely interrupt the treatment before clinical completion.
Up to 4 weeks post-discharge (T2).
Clinical Relapse Rate
Délai: 4 weeks post-discharge (T2).
Assessed with the biological tests (saliva, urine or blood) of crack cocaine relapse events tracked during the treatment
4 weeks post-discharge (T2).
Crack Cocaine Craving Intensity
Délai: Baseline (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 40-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).
Assessed with the total score and subscale scores of the Substance Craving Questionnaire (SCQ-NOW). The total score ranges from 10 to 70, where higher scores reflect a greater subjective urge and current multidimensional craving for crack cocaine.
Baseline (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 40-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).
Depression Symptoms Severity
Délai: Baseline (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 40-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).
Assessed with the total scores of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale (range 0-27). Higher scores indicate greater severity of current depressive symptomatology.
Baseline (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 40-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).
Anxiety Symptoms Severity
Délai: Baseline (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 40-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).
Assessed with the total scores of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale (range 0-21). Higher scores indicate greater severity of current anxiety symptomatology.
Baseline (T0, within 72 hours of admission), Post-Treatment (T1, approximately 40-45 days post-admission), and Follow-up (T2, 4 weeks post-discharge).

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 avril 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 décembre 2029

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

23 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

30 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

30 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 27/2025

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner