Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

High- and Moderate-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training on Diaphragm Ultrasound Parameters, Cognition, and Mental Health

5 août 2026 mis à jour par: Ceyhun Topcuoglu, Hacettepe University

Comparison of High- and Moderate-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training on Diaphragm Ultrasound Parameters, Cognition, and Mental Health in Young Adults With Low Muscle Mass Index: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Low skeletal muscle mass during young adulthood may impair diaphragm function, cognition, sleep, and psychological well-being. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been shown to improve respiratory muscle performance; however, it remains unclear whether different IMT intensities produce differential effects on diaphragm morphology and function, cognition, sleep, anxiety, and health-related quality of life.

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of high-intensity inspiratory muscle training (HI-IMT), moderate-intensity inspiratory muscle training (MI-IMT), and sham inspiratory muscle training in young adults with low skeletal muscle mass.

A total of 69 participants with low skeletal muscle mass will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) HI-IMT, (2) MI-IMT, or (3) sham IMT. Participants will complete a supervised 6-week intervention consisting of five training sessions per week.

Participants allocated to the HI-IMT group will perform inspiratory muscle training at approximately 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), whereas those in the MI-IMT group will train at approximately 50-60% of MIP. The sham group will perform low-intensity inspiratory muscle training at approximately 15% of MIP. Training intensity will be adjusted throughout the intervention according to repeated MIP assessments.

Outcome assessments will be performed before and after the intervention. Primary outcomes will include diaphragm thickness, diaphragm thickening fraction, and diaphragm excursion assessed using ultrasonography. Secondary outcomes will include cognitive function assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), daytime sleepiness assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), insomnia severity assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), anxiety assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36).

The primary hypothesis is that both HI-IMT and MI-IMT will improve diaphragm morphology and function, cognition, sleep, anxiety, and health-related quality of life compared with sham IMT. It is further hypothesized that HI-IMT will produce greater improvements than MI-IMT because of the higher inspiratory training intensity.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Low skeletal muscle mass during young adulthood has become an increasingly recognized public health concern because it is associated with reduced physical performance, impaired metabolic health, and an increased risk of developing sarcopenia later in life. In addition to peripheral skeletal muscles, reduced muscle mass may affect diaphragm structure and function, potentially contributing to impaired respiratory mechanics as well as alterations in cognition, sleep, psychological well-being, and health-related quality of life. Although inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been widely used to improve inspiratory muscle performance, the influence of different IMT intensities on diaphragm morphology and multidimensional health outcomes has not been fully established.

This randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial is designed to compare the effects of high-intensity inspiratory muscle training (HI-IMT), moderate-intensity inspiratory muscle training (MI-IMT), and sham inspiratory muscle training in young adults with low skeletal muscle mass. The primary objective is to determine whether training intensity influences changes in diaphragm structure and function assessed by ultrasonography. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of different IMT intensities on cognitive function, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, insomnia severity, anxiety, and health-related quality of life.

Participants aged 18-25 years with low skeletal muscle mass will be randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups using age- and sex-stratified block randomization. Participants allocated to the HI-IMT group will perform inspiratory muscle training at approximately 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), whereas participants in the MI-IMT group will train at approximately 50-60% of MIP. Participants in the sham group will perform inspiratory muscle training using minimal resistance (approximately 15% of MIP). The intervention will last 6 weeks, with five training sessions per week. One session each week will be supervised by a physiotherapist, and the remaining sessions will be completed at home with regular monitoring.

Outcome assessments will be performed before and after the intervention. Primary outcome measures will include diaphragm thickness, diaphragm thickening fraction, and diaphragm excursion assessed using ultrasonography. Secondary outcome measures will include body composition, cognitive function assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), daytime sleepiness assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), insomnia severity assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), anxiety assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36).

The study is designed to evaluate whether different inspiratory muscle training intensities are associated with differences in diaphragm morphology and function, cognitive function, sleep, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in young adults with low skeletal muscle mass.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

69

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Turquie (Türkiye)
      • Tunceli, Turquie (Türkiye)
        • Munzur University Faculty of Health Sciences

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Young adults aged 18 to 25 years.
  • Low skeletal muscle mass defined as a skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) < 8.87 kg/m² for men and < 6.42 kg/m² for women.
  • Clinically stable and able to safely participate in inspiratory muscle training.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Able to comply with the study procedures and complete all assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of cardiovascular, neurological, orthopedic, psychiatric, respiratory, or other systemic diseases that could influence study outcomes.
  • History of surgery that could affect participation or outcome assessments.
  • Cognitive, psychological, or mental conditions that could interfere with participation or completion of the assessments.
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete the intervention protocol or follow-up assessments.
  • Any contraindication to inspiratory muscle training as determined by the investigators.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: High-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training (HI-IMT) Group
Participants assigned to this group completed a 6-week high-intensity inspiratory muscle training program using a POWERbreathe Classic Light Resistance device. Training was performed five days per week, including one supervised session and four home-based sessions. The initial training load was set at approximately 80% of the predicted maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and was progressively adjusted weekly to maintain the target training intensity.
Autre: High-Intensity IMT
Participants performed a 6-week high-intensity inspiratory muscle training program using a threshold-loading inspiratory muscle trainer (POWERbreathe Classic Light Resistance). Training was conducted five days per week, consisting of one supervised session and four home-based sessions. The initial training intensity was set at approximately 80% of the predicted maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and was progressively adjusted weekly to maintain the target training intensity according to perceived exertion.
Expérimental: Moderate-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training (MI-IMT) Group
Participants assigned to this group completed a 6-week moderate-intensity inspiratory muscle training program using a POWERbreathe Classic Light Resistance device. Training was performed five days per week, including one supervised session and four home-based sessions. The initial training load was set at 50-60% of the predicted maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and was progressively adjusted weekly to maintain the prescribed training intensity.
Autre: Moderate-Intensity IMT
Participants performed a 6-week moderate-intensity inspiratory muscle training program using a threshold-loading inspiratory muscle trainer (POWERbreathe Classic Light Resistance). Training was conducted five days per week, consisting of one supervised session and four home-based sessions. The initial training intensity was set at 50-60% of the predicted maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and was progressively adjusted weekly to maintain the prescribed training intensity.
Comparateur factice: Sham Training Group
Participants assigned to this group completed a 6-week sham inspiratory muscle training program using the same device and training schedule. The resistance was maintained at 15% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) throughout the intervention to provide minimal inspiratory loading without an intended training effect.
Autre: Sham
Participants completed a 6-week sham inspiratory muscle training program using the same threshold-loading inspiratory muscle trainer. The intervention followed the same schedule as the active groups (five sessions per week, including one supervised and four home-based sessions), while the resistance was maintained at 15% of maximal inspiratory pressure throughout the study to provide minimal inspiratory loading without an intended training effect.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Diaphragm Thickness Measured by Ultrasonography
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Diaphragm thickness will be assessed using B-mode ultrasonography at functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC). The primary outcome is the change in diaphragm thickness from baseline to completion of the 6-week intervention. Measurements will be performed by a blinded radiologist using a standardized ultrasound protocol.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in Diaphragm Thickening Fraction
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Diaphragm thickening fraction measured by ultrasonography. The outcome is the change from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in Diaphragm Excursion
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Diaphragm excursion (mobility) measured by ultrasonography. The outcome is the change from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Cognitive function assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a 30-point cognitive screening instrument with total scores ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The outcome measure is the change in total score from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a 21-point questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. The outcome measure is the change in total score from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Daytime sleepiness assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a 24-point questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness. The outcome measure is the change in total score from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Insomnia severity assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The Insomnia Severity Index is a 28-point questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate greater insomnia severity. The outcome measure is the change in total score from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-State) Score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
State anxiety assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State (STAI-State). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State is a 20-item questionnaire with total scores ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater state anxiety. The outcome measure is the change in total score from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Trait) Score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Trait anxiety assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait (STAI-Trait). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait is a 20-item questionnaire with total scores ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater trait anxiety. The outcome measure is the change in total score from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Generalized anxiety symptoms assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7). The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale is a 7-item questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity. The outcome measure is the change in total score from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6
Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Total Score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Health-related quality of life assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey generates a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. The outcome measure is the change in total score from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline and Week 6

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Hacettepe University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

5 janvier 2026

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

21 mai 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

23 juin 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

2 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 août 2026

Première publication (Réel)

11 août 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

11 août 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 août 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2025/16-2

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner