Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Comparing Advanced Technologies to Standard Testing for the Diagnosis of Airway Disease in Hospital and Community Settings (BREATHE)

BREATHE: Benchmarking Respiratory Evaluation of Advanced Technologies for Healthcare Excellence

Airway disease, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is usually diagnosed through breathing tests like spirometry. However, it requires people to blow forcefully into a machine several times which can be uncomfortable and difficult for some patients.

This study is looking at whether newer technologies and other breathing tests can help diagnose COPD as accurately as standard testing. We will compare these tests in both hospital and community settings. We are interested in understanding how practical and cost-effective these tests are, including how easy they are to use and how comfortable they are for patients to perform.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Long-term lung conditions such as COPD affect around one in five people and are the third leading cause of death in England. These conditions are often not picked up until they have reached an advanced stage, and sometimes people are given an incorrect diagnosis. They cause breathing difficulties due to lung damage, which cannot be reversed in the case of COPD.

At present, lung conditions are usually diagnosed through breathing tests like spirometry. These tests require people to blow forcefully into a machine several times, which can be uncomfortable and difficult for some patients. They also rely on specialist equipment and must be carried out and interpreted by highly trained professionals. Because there aren't enough of these professionals, waiting lists can be long. Even when spirometry is possible, it does not always detect lung disease early.

Two national NHS programmes - the Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) programme and the Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) programme - create opportunities to find lung disease earlier. However, the same challenges with spirometry remain.

Recently, new types of lung tests have been developed. These tests may be simpler, quicker, and cheaper to use, but they are not yet part of standard NHS care. We need to find out whether these new tests can identify lung disease as well as, or better than, spirometry, especially at earlier stages. If they can, they may help prevent further lung damage and improve health outcomes. It is also important to understand how practical and cost-effective these tests are, and whether they could be used widely in different healthcare settings.

To explore this, we will carry out the new tests alongside traditional lung function tests in both community and hospital settings. We will invite adults with possible COPD who:

  • have been referred for spirometry at local CDCs,
  • have been referred for lung function testing at secondary care hospitals,
  • are attending for a lung scan as part of the LCS pathway, and
  • are attending local community groups or events.

Participants may also be asked to complete short surveys or optional interviews to share their experiences. Healthcare professionals working in testing centres will be invited to do the same. We are especially keen to hear from people who live with lung conditions or who experience health inequalities, so that we can understand how easy the tests are to use, how comfortable they are, and whether they could work well across different healthcare settings.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

300

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Professor Tom M Wilkinson, MBBS PhD FRCP FERS
  • Numéro de téléphone: 02381205341
  • E-mail: t.wilkinson@soton.ac.uk

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Hampshire
      • Andover, Hampshire, Royaume-Uni, SP10 3LB
        • Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Chercheur principal:
          • Harry S Griffin, PhD HCPC
      • Southampton, Hampshire, Royaume-Uni, SO16 6YD
        • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

Adults with a clinical suspicion of COPD/airway disease referred for spirometry testing at local community diagnostic centres or for lung function testing at secondary care hospitals. Additionally, adults attending for a low-dose CT scan as part of the lung cancer screening programme or adults attending local community groups or events

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • New referral to community or secondary healthcare services
  • Clinical suspicion of airway disease/COPD
  • Able to provide fully informed written consent
  • Able to fully understand and cooperate with the study protocol
  • Clinically stable with no contraindications to lung function testing (outlined below)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of COPD
  • Not willing and/or able to provide fully informed written consent to participate
  • Has a relative contraindication to lung function testing [18]:
  • Recent thoracic, abdominal or eye (e.g. cataract) surgery < 6 weeks
  • Unstable cardiovascular status, including recent myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolus < 6 weeks
  • Pneumothorax < 6 weeks
  • Haemoptysis of unknown origin < 6 weeks
  • Thoracic, abdominal or cerebral aneurysm
  • Chest infection < 6 weeks
  • An acute illness or symptom that might interfere with test performance (e.g. nausea, vomiting).
  • The presence of any other clinical condition that would prevent the individual from safely performing lung function tests

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
GP direct access spirometry within community diagnostic centres
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease referred for spirometry testing at local community diagnostic centres
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry). Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (if requested). Used to assess airway inflammation.
Spirometry, with or without reversibility testing
Full lung function testing within secondary care hospitals
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease referred for full lung function testing at secondary care hospitals
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry). Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (if requested). Used to assess airway inflammation.
Spirometry, with or without reversibility testing
Assesses lung diffusing capacity, performed using full pulmonary function testing equipment
Body plethysmography (if applicable). Used to assess static lung volumes and, where applicable, specific resistance, performed using full lung function equipment
Low dose-CT scan within lung cancer screening programme
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease attending for a low-dose CT scan as part of the lung cancer screening programme
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry). Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Community outreach
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease attending local community groups and events
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry). Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Diagnostic accuracy of capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms
Délai: Baseline
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV compared to clinician diagnosis of COPD
Baseline

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Diagnostic accuracy of oscillometry
Délai: Baseline
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV compared to clinician diagnosis of COPD
Baseline
Effectiveness of advanced technologies in detecting early, alternative, or precursor respiratory conditions
Délai: Baseline
Identification of pre-COPD using advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies in patients with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) / forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio on spirometry but signs of reduced FEV1, gas trapping, hyperinflation, or reduced diffusing capacity on additional lung function tests performed in secondary care, or emphysema on CT scan. Differentiation of COPD from asthma using advanced diagnostic tests, particularly in patients presenting with overlapping respiratory symptoms
Baseline
Feasibility outcomes in Lung Cancer Screening pathway
Délai: Baseline
Recruitment uptake rate, time required and the acceptability to both patients and healthcare professional to complete additional diagnostic testing in individuals invited for low-dose CT (LDCT) as part of the lung cancer screening (LCS) pathway
Baseline
Time per test
Délai: Baseline
Time per test of advanced diagnostic technologies compared to usual care
Baseline
Comparative 'failure rate'
Délai: Baseline
Comparative 'failure rate' of advanced diagnostic technologies compared to usual care
Baseline
Usability and acceptability
Délai: Baseline
Patients' perceptions on the usability and acceptability of advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies compared to existing tests such as spirometry via a non-validated questionnaire
Baseline
Usability and acceptability
Délai: Baseline
Healthcare practitioners' perceptions on the usability, acceptability and confidence in advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies via semi-structured interviews
Baseline

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 septembre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2029

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

24 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 août 2026

Première publication (Réel)

1 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

4 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

1 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Description du régime IPD

Data may be shared under appropriate governance in accordance with the TidalSense and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust agreement

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner