Repair Versus Replacement of Failed Restorations in Primary Teeth
4 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Tamara Kerber Tedesco, University of Sao Paulo
Repair Versus Replacement of Failed Restorations in Primary Teeth: Protocol for a Non-Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
Dental caries affect approximately 573 million children globally, and the management of failed restorations is a frequent clinical issue in pediatric dentistry.
Although complete replacement of restorations is traditionally the most commonly adopted approach, repair represents a minimally invasive alternative that preserves healthy dental structure and reduces the risk of pulpal complications.
Studies in permanent teeth demonstrate that repair may present longevity similar to replacement; however, there is no robust evidence regarding this comparison in primary teeth.
This randomized controlled clinical trial, with parallel groups and a 1:1 allocation ratio, aims to evaluate the non-inferiority of repair compared with replacement of failed restorations in primary molars, using encapsulated high-viscosity glass ionomer cement.
Children aged 4 to 8 years with at least one failed restoration eligible for repair in primary molars will be included.
Randomization will be stratified by number of surfaces.
Teeth (n=824) will be randomly allocated to one of the groups: repair or replacement.
The primary outcome will be restoration survival at 24 months.
Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated as a secondary outcome.
Statistical analysis will use Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression with shared frailty (¿=5%).
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Pas encore de recrutement
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Estimé)
382
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Tamara K Tedesco, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: +5511954866622
- E-mail: tamarakt@usp.br
Lieux d'étude
-
-
São Paulo
-
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brésil, 05508-000
- University of São Paulo, School of Dentistry
-
Contact:
- Tamara K Tedesco, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: +5511954866622
- E-mail: tamarakt@usp.br
-
Contact:
- Camila C Cabral, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: +5511996254588
- E-mail: camila.cabral@usp.br
-
Sous-enquêteur:
- Aline S Gusmão, DDS
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children aged 4 to 8 years;
- Presence of at least one defective restoration in a primary molar, involving no more than 3 surfaces;
- Absence of clinical and radiographic signs of pulp involvement;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Tooth without pulp vitality or requiring endodontic treatment;
- Loose or mobile restoration;
- Presence of fistula, abscess, or history of pain;
- Tooth mobility incompatible with the physiological exfoliation timeline;
- Parents/guardians who do not consent to participation by signing the ICF, or children who do not assent to participate in the study.
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Repair
Repair of Failed restoration in primary teeth.
|
Prior to the procedure, when needed, local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine will be used, with relative isolation (cotton rolls and saliva ejector).
The defective area will be clinically identified.
When present, carious tissue will be selectively removed with hand instruments (dentin curettes) suited to the cavity, preserving as much of the intact original restoration as possible.
If no hand instrument fits, the cavity will be enlarged with a small spherical diamond bur at high speed under cooling.
The surface will be conditioned with 20% polyacrylic acid (GC Cavity Conditioner) for 10 s, rinsed abundantly, and dried with cotton pellets.
For proximal surfaces, a metal matrix and wedge will be placed before the GIC.
The capsule will be activated, mixed for 10 s, inserted with an applicator, and adapted by digital pressure with petroleum jelly.
Occlusion will be checked with articulating paper and adjusted; surface protection applied with petroleum jelly.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Replacement
Replacement of Failed Restoration in primary teeth.
|
Prior to the procedure, when needed, infiltrative local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine will be administered.
Relative isolation will be used, with cotton rolls and a saliva ejector.
Complete removal of the defective restorative material will be performed with spherical diamond burs at high speed under cooling, complemented by round burs at low speed to remove remaining restorative material.
Selective removal of carious tissue, when present, will be carried out with hand instruments (dentin curettes) suited to the cavity, preserving soft or leathery dentin according to the depth of the lesion.
The new restoration will then be placed following the same protocol described for the repair group: conditioning with 20% polyacrylic acid (GC Cavity Conditioner) for 10 s, rinsing and removal of excess water; placement of a metal matrix and wedge, when needed; insertion of the GIC into the cavity; adaptation by digital pressure with petroleum jelly; occlusal adjustment; a
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Restoration survival
Délai: 24 months
|
Restoration survival will be assessed based on clinical evaluation of the restorations at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. A restoration will be considered to have survived when it remains clinically satisfactory according to the following criteria. Single-surface restorations will be considered satisfactory when scored as 0 (restoration present and satisfactory), 1 (restoration present, with a slight marginal defect and/or surface wear of less than 0.5 mm in depth, with no need for repair), or 7 (restoration present, with gradual wear involving larger areas of the restoration but less than 0.5 mm in depth at the deepest point, with no need for repair), according to Frencken et al. (1996). Multiple-surface restorations will be considered satisfactory when scored as 00 (restoration present and satisfactory) or 10 (restoration present, with a slight marginal defect and/or surface wear of less than 0.5 mm in depth, with no need for repair), according to Rôlevald et al. (2006). |
24 months
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment success
Délai: 24 months
|
Treatment success at 24 months will be assessed as a binary outcome.
All participants will be clinically evaluated at 24 months, and each treated tooth will be classified as either successful or unsuccessful.
Treatment will be considered successful when the treated tooth requires no operative reintervention during the 24-month follow-up period and remains asymptomatic, according to the clinical criteria described above.
Natural exfoliation of the treated tooth during the follow-up period will also be considered a successful outcome.
Treatment failure will be defined as the need for operative reintervention due to disease progression or treatment failure, including endodontic treatment or extraction.
|
24 months
|
|
Parents' and Child's Preference
Délai: Before randomization and prior to treatment
|
Before randomization, parents or guardians and the child will receive a standardized explanation of the two therapeutic approaches under investigation (replacement and repair of restorations).
To aid comprehension, illustrative images generated by artificial intelligence will be presented, depicting each procedure in a standardized manner.
Parents or guardians and the child will then be asked: "If you could choose, which treatment would you prefer?"
Responses will be recorded as: replacement, repair, or no preference.
|
Before randomization and prior to treatment
|
|
Treatment Time
Délai: From the beginning to the completion of the treatment procedure
|
The total treatment time will be measured by a research assistant using a digital stopwatch.
Timing will start at the beginning of the clinical intervention and stop immediately after its completion.
Time will be recorded and expressed in minutes (min).
|
From the beginning to the completion of the treatment procedure
|
|
Child's Perception
Délai: Immediately after the procedure (Day 0)
|
The child's perception of the treatment will be assessed immediately after completion of the procedure using the Facial Image Scale (FIS).
The scale will be presented by the research assistant, in the absence of the operator, in order to minimize the professional's influence on the response.
The child will be asked to indicate the image that best represents how they felt during the treatment, following the question: "How did you feel during the treatment?"
The FIS consists of five facial images ranging from a very happy to a very sad expression, allowing assessment of the child's acceptance of the experience.
|
Immediately after the procedure (Day 0)
|
|
Parents'/Guardians' Satisfaction
Délai: Immediately after the procedure (Day 0)
|
Immediately after completion of the treatment, parents or guardians will answer the following question: "How satisfied are you with the treatment performed on your child?"
The response will be recorded on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied.
|
Immediately after the procedure (Day 0)
|
|
Parents'/Guardians' Willingness to Choose the Treatment Again
Délai: 30 days after the procedure
|
At 30 days after the procedure, parents or guardians will be presented again with illustrative images of the two therapeutic approaches, accompanied by the same standardized explanation used in the initial assessment.
They will then be asked: "If you could choose again, which treatment would you choose for your child?"
Responses will be recorded as repair, replacement, or no preference.
|
30 days after the procedure
|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Délai: 24 months
|
Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted comparing the repair and replacement of defective restorations in primary molars over 24 months of follow-up.
Restoration survival over this period will be used as the effectiveness measure for the economic analysis.
The analysis will adopt the perspective of the Brazilian public health system and will consider only direct treatment costs.
|
24 months
|
|
Treatment Cost
Délai: Immediately after the procedure (Day 0)
|
The direct costs associated with the repair and replacement of restorations will be compared, considering the clinical treatment time and materials actually used in each procedure.
Treatment time will be measured by a research assistant who is not involved in performing the interventions and will be used to estimate the dental professional's labor cost based on the cost per hour of professional work.
Material costs will be estimated based on the actual amount consumed during each procedure and the prices obtained from three quotations from different suppliers, with the mean value of the quotations used for cost calculation.
Costs will be expressed in Brazilian reais (BRL), based on the prices prevailing during the study period.
|
Immediately after the procedure (Day 0)
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Camila C Cabral, PhD, University of Sao Paulo
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
7 octobre 2026
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
1 avril 2029
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
1 avril 2029
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
4 septembre 2026
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
4 septembre 2026
Première publication (Réel)
10 septembre 2026
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
10 septembre 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
4 septembre 2026
Dernière vérification
1 septembre 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- RepairPEDO
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
OUI
Description du régime IPD
Anonymized individual participant data (IPD) collected from parents and/or caregivers will be shared, including demographic and study-related data, treatment preference, treatment satisfaction, willingness to choose the treatment again, and other participant-level outcome data collected during the study.
All data will be fully anonymized prior to sharing to prevent identification of participants or disclosure of sensitive information.
Délai de partage IPD
Start date: After publication of the study results End date: No end date
Critères d'accès au partage IPD
Anonymized individual participant data and the study protocol will be publicly accessible to researchers and other interested users through the designated public data repository.
Access will be unrestricted, subject to the repository's terms of use.
Only fully anonymized data will be made available, with no information that could reasonably identify individual participants.
Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD
- PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
- SÈVE
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .