Project GAME ON! A Digital Comic Tool to Promote Healthy Behaviors
10 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Maymay Leung, Tufts University
Project GAME ON!: Empowering Urban Children to Engage in Healthy Behaviors to Reduce Obesity Risk Through an Interactive Digital Comic Tool
This clinical trial aims to evaluate an interactive, culturally relevant digital health promotion comic designed to support healthy dietary and physical activity behaviors among Black/African American and Latino children ages 8 to 12 years. The comic allows children's choices to affect the storyline and health content, with the goal of increasing engagement, empowering children, and improving attitudes, beliefs, and self-efficacy related to healthy behaviors. Caregivers will also receive newsletters reinforcing healthy dietary and physical activity behaviors at home.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does an interactive, customizable "choose-your-own-adventure" style comic lead to greater engagement and acceptability compared to standard digital comic formats?
- Is greater engagement with the comic associated with improved self-efficacy related to dietary and physical activity behaviors? Researchers will compare three study groups to evaluate differences in engagement, acceptability, and self-efficacy outcomes related to dietary and physical activity behaviors.
Participants will:
- Use a 6-week digital comic and health promotion website remotely
- Complete surveys about engagement, attitudes, beliefs, and self-efficacy related to healthy behaviors
- Receive periodic reminders and support messages during the intervention period
- For caregivers in the enhanced and non-enhanced comic groups: receive newsletters promoting healthy dietary and physical activity behaviors at home
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Pas encore de recrutement
Les conditions
Description détaillée
The proposed study aims to develop and evaluate the usability, acceptability, engagement, and preliminary effectiveness of a customizable, 6-week interactive digital health promotion comic tool for Black/African American and Latino children ages 8 to 12 years. The intervention is designed to promote self-efficacy related to healthy dietary and physical activity behaviors through an interactive, culturally relevant, family-centered web-based platform.
A previous version of the tool was developed through an R21 grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Building on this prior work, the current study will develop a new six-chapter intervention comic available in both a standard and enhanced interactivity format, in which children's choices influence the storyline and health-related content.
In the first phase of the study (Aim 1), usability testing will be conducted with children from the intended audience to evaluate the enhanced interactive comic format and identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for refinement related to navigation, comprehension, engagement, and overall user experience.
In the second phase of the study (Aim 2), a three-group pilot randomized controlled trial (30 parent-child dyads per arm) with a 6-week intervention period and 3-month follow-up will be conducted to assess engagement and acceptability of the enhanced comic structure and explore the association between engagement and self-efficacy related to dietary and physical activity behaviors. Participants will be randomized to one of three conditions: an enhanced interactive comic intervention with caregiver newsletters, a standard comic intervention with caregiver newsletters, or a comparison condition consisting of child newsletters only. Caregiver newsletters provided in the intervention groups will reinforce healthy dietary and physical activity behaviors at home.
This study evaluates an innovative digital health communication approach designed to increase accessibility and engagement among an underserved and diverse pediatric population. Findings from this study may help inform future digital health interventions aimed at promoting healthy behaviors and reducing long-term chronic disease risk among children.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Estimé)
180
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: May May Leung, PhD, RDN
- Numéro de téléphone: 617-636-3676
- E-mail: maymay.leung@tufts.edu
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
Accepte les volontaires sains
Oui
La description
Inclusion Criteria (child):
- Self-identifies as Black/AA and/or Latino
- Between the ages of 8 and 12 (preadolescents) at the time enrollment
- Reads and speaks in English
- Has regular internet access via a tablet device, smartphone, or computer/laptoP
- Has regular access to a phone with texting capability
- Is comfortable reading/viewing material on electronic devices
- Is comfortable speaking with study staff about thoughts/experiences while participating in the study
- Is part of a household with low income
- Resides in New York City
- At least one of their current diet and PA-related behaviors do not meet the current recommendations for a healthy lifestyle
- Has a legal parent/guardian willing to participate in the study
Inclusion Criteria (parent)
- Legal parent/guardian of child willing to participate in the study
- Reads and speaks in English or Spanish
- Primarily responsible for preparing/purchasing food for child
- Has regular internet access via a tablet device, smartphone, or computer/laptop
- Has regular access to a phone with texting capability
- Comfortable reading/viewing material on electronic devices
- Able to complete online questionnaires with their child over the full duration of the study
- Is part of a household with low income
- Resides in New York City.
Exclusion Criteria (child):
- has allergies, food aversions, food disorders, or medications with side-effects that may impact participation in study
- has a pacemaker or heart condition
- in foster care
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: La prévention
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Enhanced Comic
Children in the Enhanced Comic Group (E) will receive access to a theory-guided, family-centered, web-based tool promoting healthy diet behaviors that includes a 6-chapter comic with customizable features, including main character customization and user-selected options to determine the main character's actions and storyline.
Parents of children in this group will receive a digital newsletter.
|
Web-based customizable comic and health messages (child component) and health newsletters (parent component)
|
|
Comparateur actif: Non-enhanced Comic
The children in the Non-enhanced Comic Group will receive the same comic as children in the E group, but with a default main character and storyline (no user-selected options).
Parents of children in this group will receive the same digital newsletter as parents of children in the E group
|
Web-based standard (non-customizable) comic and health messages (child component) and health newsletters (parent component)
|
|
Comparateur actif: Comparison
Children in the Comparison group will receive the web-based newsletters focused on promoting healthy diet behaviors.
|
Web-based newsletters child only
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Child Engagement - Number of Weeks With at Least One Session
Délai: Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
Child engagement will be assessed based on the number of intervention weeks during which the child has at least one session on the intervention website.
Children with at least one session during 4-6 of the 6 intervention weeks will be categorized as having high engagement, and children with at least one session during 0-3 weeks will be categorized as having low engagement.
|
Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
|
Child Engagement - Average Session Length
Délai: Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
Child engagement will be assessed based on the average length of sessions on intervention website.
An average session length of 20 minutes or more will be categorized as high engagement, and an average session length of less than 20 minutes will be categorized as low engagement.
|
Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
|
Child Engagement - Interactive Features
Délai: Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
Child engagement will be assessed based on the number of intervention weeks during which the child completes at least 5 interactive features.
Interactive features include clickable health-message pop-ups, goal selection, and goal self-assessment.
Children who complete at least 5 interactive features during 4-6 of the 6 intervention weeks will be categorized as having high engagement, and children who meet this threshold during 0-3 weeks will be categorized as having low engagement.
|
Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
|
Parent Engagement - Number of Weeks With at Least One Session
Délai: Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
Parent engagement will be assessed based on the number of intervention weeks during which the parent has at least one session on the intervention website.
Parents with at least one session during 4-6 of the 6 intervention weeks will be categorized as having high engagement, and parents with at least one session during 0-3 weeks will be categorized as having low engagement.
|
Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
|
Parent Engagement - Average Session Length
Délai: Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
Parent engagement will be assessed based on the average length of intervention sessions during the 6-week intervention period.
An average session length of 15 minutes or more will be categorized as high engagement, and an average session length of less than 15 minutes will be categorized as low engagement.
|
Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
|
Parent Engagement -Interactive Features
Délai: Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
Parent engagement will be assessed based on the number of intervention weeks during which the parent completes both available interactive features: goal setting and goal self-assessment.
Parents who complete both interactive features during 4-6 of the 6 intervention weeks will be categorized as having high engagement, and parents who complete both features during 0-3 weeks will be categorized as having low engagement.
|
Tool usage will be tracked for the 6-week intervention period.
|
|
Child Website Usability
Délai: T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
Child website usability will be measured using 10 items adapted from the SUS Questionnaire.
The items assess perceived website usability and ease of use.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree).
Item responses will be averaged to produce a mean score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived website usability.
|
T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
|
Child Website Acceptance and Satisfaction
Délai: T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
Child website acceptance and satisfaction will be assessed using 2 items adapted from the USE Questionnaire measuring enjoyment of the website and willingness to recommend the website to a friend.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate greater website acceptance and satisfaction.
|
T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
|
Parent Website Usability
Délai: T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
Parent website usability will be measured using 9 items, including items adapted from the SUS, USE, and PSSUQ Questionnaires.
The items assess website usability, usefulness, and ease of use.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree).
Item responses will be averaged to produce a mean score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived website usability.
|
T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
|
Parent Website Acceptance and Satisfaction
Délai: T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
Parent website acceptance and satisfaction will be assessed using 2 items adapted from the USE Questionnaire measuring satisfaction with the website and willingness to recommend the website to a friend.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate greater website acceptance and satisfaction.
|
T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Child Dietary Self-Efficacy
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Child participants will complete a 10-item questionnaire informed by and modified from the validated ProChildren and Reynolds questionnaires on self-efficacy related to behaviors associated with fruits, vegetables, water, junk food, and sugary drinks.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Child Dietary Knowledge
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Child dietary knowledge will be assessed using 6 items, including 4 items from the ProChildren and Reynolds questionnaires and 2 internally developed items.
Items assess knowledge related to fruit, vegetable, and water intake.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Child Dietary Outcome Expectations
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Child dietary outcome expectations will be assessed using 15 items from or adapted from the ProChildren and Reynolds questionnaires assessing outcome expectations related to fruit, vegetable, water, junk food, and and sugary drink intake.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Child Dietary Behavioral Intentions
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
Child dietary behavioral intentions will be assessed using 8 items adapted from the ProChildren Questionnaire.
Items assess intentions related to fruit, vegetable, water, junk food, and sugary drink intake.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
|
Child Dietary Attitudes and Beliefs
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
Child dietary attitudes and beliefs will be assessed using 10 items adapted from the ProChildren Questionnaire.
Items assess attitudes and beliefs related to fruit, vegetable, water, junk food, and sugary drinks.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
|
Child Dietary Intake
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Child dietary intake will be assessed using 10 items adapted from the YRBSS Questionnaire and the Beverage and Snack Questionnaire.
Items assess intake of fruit, vegetables, junk food, sugary drinks, and water.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Child Physical Activity Self-Efficacy
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Child participants will complete a 4-item questionnaire informed by the PASE Questionnaire on self-efficacy related to behaviors associated with physical activity.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Child Physical Activity Knowledge
Délai: [Time Frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)]
|
Child physical activity knowledge will be assessed using 2 internally developed items.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
[Time Frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)]
|
|
Child Physical Activity Outcome Expectations
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Child physical activity outcome expectations will be assessed using 3 items from or adapted from the Social-Cognitive Measures for Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Items assess outcome expectations related to physical activity.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Child Physical Activity Behavioral Intentions
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
Child physical activity behavioral intentions will be assessed using 10 items adapted from the ProChildren Questionnaire.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
|
Child Physical Activity Attitudes and Beliefs
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
Child physical activity attitudes and beliefs will be assessed using 2 items adapted from the ProChildren Questionnaire.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
|
Child Physical Activity
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
Child physical activity and sedentary behavior will be assessed using 5 items, including 3 items from the YRBSS and 2 internally developed items.
Items assess the number of days children are physically active for at least 60 minutes, frequency of physical activity on school and weekend days, and screen time on school and weekend days.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3 weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6 weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3 months post-intervention)
|
|
Child - Identification
Délai: T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
Identification will be assessed using a 2-item scale adapted from Cohen et al.'s Identification Scale.
Items assess the extent to which participants identify with and relate to the main character in the story.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree), with higher scores indicating greater identification.
|
T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
|
Child - Narrative Transportation
Délai: T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
5-item scale adapted from the Transportation Scale -Short Form.
Items assess the extent to which participants become mentally and emotionally absorbed and immersed in the story.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5= Strongly Agree), with higher scores indicating greater narrative transportation.
|
T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline) and T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline)
|
|
Parent Feeding Practices
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Parent feeding practices will be assessed using 25 items informed by the the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire questionnaire.
Items assess parent practices that support healthy dietary intake, including discussing healthy behaviors with the child, providing opportunities and resources for healthy behaviors, encouraging healthy choices, involving the child in food-related activities, modeling healthy behaviors, and confidence in discussing healthy behaviors with the child.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Parent Physical Activity Practices
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Parent physical activity practices will be assessed using 8 items informed by the ACTS-MG questionnaire.
Items assess parent practices that support physical activity, including discussing physical activity with the child, providing opportunities and resources for physical activity, encouraging physical activity, modeling physical activity and confidence in discussing physical activity with the child.
Response options are on a 5-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree).
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Parent Perspective - Home Food Environment
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Parent-reported home food environment will be assessed using 10 items from or adapted from the ProChildren Questionnaire and the Home Environment Survey.
Items assess the availability and accessibility of fruits, vegetables, water, junk food, and sugary drinks in the home.
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
|
Child Perspective - Home Food Environment
Délai: T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Child-reported home food environment will be assessed using 5 items from or adapted from the ProChildren Questionnaire.
Items assess the availability fruits, vegetables, water, junk food, and sugary drinks in the home.
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
T1 (baseline), T2 (intervention mid-point, 3-weeks post-baseline), T3 (intervention endpoint, 6-weeks post-baseline), T4 (follow-up, 3-months post intervention)
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
1 septembre 2026
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
1 avril 2027
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
30 juin 2027
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
24 août 2026
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
10 septembre 2026
Première publication (Réel)
15 septembre 2026
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
15 septembre 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
10 septembre 2026
Dernière vérification
1 septembre 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- STUDY00006271
- R41MD020611 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .