Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

A Manualized Recreational Therapy Balance Program for Older Adults With Parkinson's and Movement Disorders

22 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: JungyuLee, Oklahoma State University

Enhancing Stability and Connection: A Manualized Recreational Therapy Balance Program for Older Adults With Parkinson's and Movement Disorders in Oklahoma Small Cities

This study evaluates a manualized recreational therapy balance program for older adults with Parkinson's disease and movement disorders who live in small cities and rural areas of Oklahoma, where access to movement disorder specialists is limited.

Twenty-four older adults with Parkinson's disease and movement disorders will be randomly assigned to one of two groups of 12. One group will attend the balance program continuously for 24 weeks. The other group will attend the program for 12 weeks and will then be observed for 12 weeks without the program. All sessions are led by a Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist and last about 50 minutes once a week.

Participants will be assessed three times: before the program begins, at three months, and at six months. The assessments measure gait velocity and stride length, postural stability, fall-related confidence, anxiety and depression, and social connectedness.

The purpose of the study is to learn how long a community balance program needs to continue for older adults to keep the gains they make, and how quickly those gains decline when the program ends.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Parkinson's disease and movement disorders accelerate physical decline. In Oklahoma, more than 15,000 residents have Parkinson's disease, and about one-third live in rural areas. Rural isolation restricts access to movement disorder specialists, and fewer than 30% of individuals with Parkinson's disease engage in regular physical activity. Rural patients face barriers including limited transportation, fear of injury, and a lack of local programs or peer support.

This study evaluates a manualized recreational therapy balance protocol that was developed with funding from the American Parkinson Disease Association (FY2025-1461556). The evaluation is designed to determine the dosage of community-based exercise required to promote sustained mobility and to prevent the physical regression often seen after a program ends.

Design. Twenty-four older adults diagnosed with Parkinson's disease and movement disorders will be randomly assigned to two equal cohorts of 12 in a two-cohort comparative evaluation. Cohort 1 will receive the continuous in-person intervention for six months (24 weeks). Cohort 2 will receive the intervention for three months (12 weeks), followed by a three-month observation period intended to quantify the decay of training effects.

Setting. The intervention is delivered in person at Legacy Village of Stillwater, Oklahoma.

Participants. Participants must be able to tolerate a 50-minute physical session once per week.

Intervention. All sessions follow a manualized recreational therapy balance protocol and are directed by a Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist. The program includes static and dynamic balance training.

Assessments. Data are collected by a Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist and research assistants at baseline, month three, and month six. The GAITRite system (CIR Systems, New Jersey, USA) measures gait velocity and stride length. The BioSway system (Biodex Medical Systems, New York, USA) quantifies postural stability. Secondary outcomes are measured with the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International for fall-related self-efficacy, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for psychological states, and the Lubben Social Network Scale for social connectedness.

Research questions. (1) Does a 24-week continuous manualized recreational therapy balance program yield higher retention of postural stability and gait velocity compared with a 12-week intervention followed by a 12-week observation period in adults with Parkinson's disease? (2) How do the two intervention durations differ in sustaining fall-related self-efficacy, reducing anxiety, and building social connectedness at the six-month benchmark? (3) What duration of CTRS-led community intervention establishes lasting independence for patients lacking access to movement disorder specialists?

Hypotheses. (1) The 24-week cohort retains baseline posture and gait velocity at month six, while the 12-week cohort experiences regression. (2) The 24-week cohort sustains fall confidence, reduces anxiety, and builds group bonds at month six. (3) The 24-week duration establishes the threshold for lasting patient independence.

Analysis. Analysis is conducted in collaboration with the Oklahoma State University Physical Activity and Public Health Lab using a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance across three time points (baseline, week 12, and week 24), comparing the continuous cohort with the abbreviated cohort.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

24

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Oklahoma
      • Stillwater, Oklahoma, États-Unis, 74074
        • Legacy Village of Stillwater
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

50 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease or another movement disorder
  • Able to tolerate a 50-minute physical activity session once per week
  • Able to attend in-person sessions at the study site
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical condition that prevents safe participation in balance exercise
  • Unable to attend the weekly in-person sessions

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: 24-week continuous balance program

Participants attend the manualized recreational therapy balance program continuously for 24 weeks. Sessions are led by a Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist, last approximately 50 minutes, and are held once per week at Legacy Village of Stillwater. Sessions include static and dynamic balance training. Assessments are conducted at baseline, month three, and month six.

A manualized balance training protocol delivered in person by a Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist in approximately 50-minute weekly sessions, including static and dynamic balance training. The protocol was developed with funding from the American Parkinson Disease Association.

Comparateur actif: 12-week balance program followed by 12-week observation

Participants attend the same manualized recreational therapy balance program for 12 weeks under the same schedule and format, and then enter a 12-week observation period during which the program is not provided. Assessments are conducted at baseline, month three, and month six.

A manualized balance training protocol delivered in person by a Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist in approximately 50-minute weekly sessions, including static and dynamic balance training. The protocol was developed with funding from the American Parkinson Disease Association.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in gait velocity measured by the GAITRite system
Délai: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Gait velocity in centimeters per second measured with the GAITRite electronic walkway (CIR Systems, New Jersey, USA). Higher values indicate faster walking.

Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in postural stability measured by the BioSway system
Délai: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Postural stability measured with the BioSway balance system (Biodex Medical Systems, New York, USA). Higher sway values indicate poorer postural stability.

Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Change in fall-related self-efficacy measured by the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (Short FES-I)
Délai: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Seven-item scale scored from 7 to 28. Higher scores indicate greater concern about falling.

Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Change in anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Délai: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Fourteen-item scale scored from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Change in social connectedness measured by the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS)
Délai: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Scale measuring perceived social network size and support. Higher scores indicate greater social connectedness.

Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 octobre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 mai 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

13 mai 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

22 septembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

22 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

29 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

29 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

22 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly. The IRB-approved protocol and informed consent documents do not include provisions for sharing individual participant data outside the research team. De-identified aggregate results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner