Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Evaluation of Three Trauma Mortality Scores in Adults Admitted to Intensive Care in Tunisia (TICU-SCORES)

29 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Sameh Ben Ahmed, University Tunis El Manar

External Validation and Local Recalibration of GAP, MGAP, and the New Trauma Score for Triage (T-NTS) for All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality in Adult Trauma Patients Admitted to Intensive Care in Tunisia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The goal of this retrospective observational study is to learn how well three simple trauma scores predict death during the hospital stay in adults admitted to intensive care after an injury in Tunisia. The scores are the Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score (GAP); the Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score (MGAP); and the New Trauma Score for Triage (T-NTS). Researchers will review existing medical records for admissions from 1 January 2018 through 31 December 2025. They will not assign treatment or contact participants. The main question is how accurately the three scores distinguish participants who died in the hospital from those discharged alive. Secondary analyses will examine agreement between score-based risk and observed mortality and performance for mortality by day 7 after ICU admission.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Description détaillée

This single-centre retrospective cohort study will externally validate GAP, MGAP, and T-NTS in an ICU-selected adult trauma population at a tertiary hospital in Tunisia. All consecutive eligible adults physically admitted to the participating ICU during the fixed eight-year clinical window will be screened. Predictor values will be taken from the earliest qualified assessment after injury and before sedation, neuromuscular blockade, and tracheal intubation. The study therefore evaluates prognosis among trauma patients who reached intensive care and does not claim validation for triage of all emergency-department trauma patients.

The primary endpoint is death from any cause before live discharge from the continuous index admission to the study hospital. The primary comparison will use one common complete-case cohort with known outcome, age, mechanism, qualified Glasgow Coma Scale, systolic blood pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation. Missing predictor values will not be imputed and will not change cohort eligibility; missingness and the flow from screened to eligible and analyzable participants will be reported.

Score discrimination will be summarized by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence intervals and paired comparisons using DeLong's method. Observed mortality will be described within original score risk groups. Separate one-predictor logistic models will estimate local score-to-risk relationships, with 1,000 bootstrap resamples for internal validation. Mortality by calendar day 7 after index ICU admission will be a prespecified secondary endpoint if retained in the final signed protocol. No treatment, diagnostic procedure, or exposure is assigned by the investigators.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

1000

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon de probabilité

Population étudiée

Adults aged 18 years or older who were physically admitted to the intensive care unit of Mohamed Tahar Maâmouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia, because acute blunt or penetrating trauma, or an immediate consequence of that trauma, was the principal indication for critical care between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2025. All consecutive potentially eligible admissions will be identified from the ICU registers and medical records. Only the first qualifying trauma episode and ICU admission per patient will be included. Eligible patients with missing score variables will remain in the eligible cohort but may not enter the common complete-case analysis

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older at the earliest qualified assessment.
  2. Acute physical injury caused by a blunt or penetrating mechanism.
  3. Trauma or an immediate consequence of trauma was the principal reason for the first qualifying intensive care unit admission.
  4. The first qualifying intensive care unit admission occurred from 1 January 2018 through 31 December 2025, inclusive.
  5. The intensive care unit admission belonged to the continuous acute hospitalization following the index injury.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age younger than 18 years.
  2. No physical admission to the participating intensive care unit, including death before ICU admission.
  3. Isolated burn, isolated inhalation injury, drowning, hanging, asphyxia, poisoning, or isolated thermal, electrical, or chemical injury without qualifying blunt or penetrating trauma.
  4. ICU admission for a medical condition when trauma was incidental and not the principal indication for critical care.
  5. Elective, reconstructive, rehabilitation, or late readmission after discharge from the acute trauma hospitalization.
  6. Iatrogenic injury or procedural complication without qualifying external blunt or penetrating trauma.
  7. Duplicate record or ICU readmission within the same trauma hospitalization.
  8. A later eligible trauma episode in a patient already included during the study period.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Modèles d'observation: COHORT
  • Perspectives temporelles: RETROSPECTIVE

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
Adult Trauma ICU Cohort

All consecutive eligible adults admitted to the participating intensive care unit because of acute blunt or penetrating trauma between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2025. GAP, MGAP, and the New Trauma Score for Triage (T-NTS) will be calculated retrospectively from routinely recorded clinical data. No treatment or diagnostic procedure is assigned by the investigators.

The Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score (GAP); the Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score (MGAP); and the New Trauma Score for Triage (T-NTS) will be calculated retrospectively using existing clinical information recorded before sedation, neuromuscular blockade, or tracheal intubation whenever available. The scores are evaluated as prognostic tools; they are not used to assign treatment or alter patient care.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Discrimination of GAP, MGAP, and T-NTS for All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality
Délai: From index hospital presentation to in-hospital death or live discharge during the continuous index hospitalization (expected up to 12 months)

The clinical endpoint is death from any cause before live discharge from the continuous index admission to the study hospital. For each score, discrimination will be quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with a 95% confidence interval in the common complete-case cohort. AUROC ranges from 0.5 (no discrimination) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination). Correlated AUROCs will be compared using DeLong's method.

From index hospital presentation to in-hospital death or live discharge during the continuous index hospitalization (expected up to 12 months)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Calibration and Local Recalibration of GAP, MGAP, and T-NTS for All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality
Délai: From index hospital presentation to in-hospital death or live discharge during the continuous index hospitalization (expected up to 12 months)

Observed all-cause in-hospital mortality with 95% confidence intervals will be reported within the original risk groups of each score. For each score, a one-predictor logistic model relating the original total score to mortality will estimate a local score-to-risk relationship. Internal validation of the recalibration procedure will use 1,000 bootstrap resamples.

From index hospital presentation to in-hospital death or live discharge during the continuous index hospitalization (expected up to 12 months)
Discrimination of GAP, MGAP, and T-NTS for All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality by Day 7
Délai: From index ICU admission through calendar day 7 (ICU admission date = day 0)

The clinical endpoint is death from any cause in the study hospital on or before calendar day 7 after the first qualifying ICU admission; the ICU admission date is day 0. The endpoint is derived from dates and is not an exact 168-hour measure. Discrimination of GAP, MGAP, and T-NTS will be summarized by AUROC with 95% confidence intervals; paired DeLong comparisons will be reported if the number of day-7 deaths is adequate.

From index ICU admission through calendar day 7 (ICU admission date = day 0)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: sameh ben ahmed, MD, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Mohamed Taher Maamouri Teaching Hospital Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar Mrezga, 8000 Nabeul, Tunisia

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 octobre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

15 décembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

15 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

23 septembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

23 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

30 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

2 octobre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • HTMM-TICU-SCORES-01
  • 59-2026 (Autre identifiant: Comité d'éthique de l'Hôpital Mohamed Tahar Maâmouri)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant-level data extracted from confidential medical records will not be made publicly available. The data dictionary and statistical code may be shared with publication subject to ethics and institutional approval

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner