Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease (VNS)

2 novembre 2026 mis à jour par: Vincent Mok, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Although breakthroughs in the management of Parkinson's disease (PD) have emerged in recent decades resulting in better control in symptoms, majority of patients with PD are still living with various disabling motor and non-motor symptoms despite they are already receiving the best contemporary medical or surgical treatments available to them. There is obviously a need to develop additional treatment modality to further optimize the control of symptoms and/or slow the disease progression for patients having PD.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), a type of noninvasive brain stimulation is believed to modify brain rhythms by modulating the nucleus of the solitary tract and locus coeruleus and other regions known to play a role in gait. Moreover, VNS may modulate inflammatory pathways and reduce oxidative stress, making it a potential disease modifying treatment approach for neurodegenerative diseases linked to neuroinflammation such as PD

Further study is warranted to explore the efficacy of non-invasive VNS for its effects on gait and other symptoms of PD as well as the anti-inflammatory effects.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The objective of the present study is to investigate the feasibility, safety, and potential efficacy of 2 different non-invasive VNS stimulation protocols (conventional and exploratory) for patients with PD. The immediate effects of VNS as well as the medium-term effects of daily VNS at 2 and 4 weeks poststimulation, and the delayed effects of non-invasive VNS at 8 weeks of both stimulation protocols will be investigated. The effects of non-invasive VNS of the 2 different stimulation protocols will also be compared with sham stimulation. The study will be a randomized single blind study. The tested subjects, not the assessor, will be kept unaware of which treatment protocols they are receiving.

The investigator hypothesize the VNS stimulations may provide immediate effects, medium term effects and delayed effects.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

60

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

40 ans à 75 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Idiopathic PD as defined by the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank Diagnostic Criteria

  2. Age 40 - 75 years old

  3. Presence of gait impairment as defined by any one of the below:

    a UPDRS Part 2 Item 15 (Walking) with a score of 2 b. UPDRS Part 3 Item 26 (leg Agility) with score of 2 or 3 c. UPDRS Part 3 Item 29 (Gait) with score of 1 or 2

  4. Availability of a caregiver at home

  5. Cantonese speaker

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with atypical parkinsonism (e.g., multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, dementia with Lewy Bodies)
  2. PD with dementia
  3. PD patients with DBS in-situ
  4. Severe PD with a Hoehn and Yahr staging of 4 or above
  5. Low blood pressure with systolic of < 110 mmHg or with postural hypotension as defined by a decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 20 mmHg and 10mmHg upon standing, respectively)
  6. Cardiac pacemaker in-situ

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: conventional VNS

Parkinson Disease
Dispositif: cVNS

The cVNS emits a low-voltage 5.56 KHz sinusoidal wave electrical signal bursts lasting 0.9 ms via two flat stimulation contact surfaces. (Figure 2) These bursts repeat once every 38 millisecond (ms). Each set of stimulation will be applied for 2 minutes. Stimulation current can be self-adjusted by the subject. This conventional stimulation waveform was approved by the US FDA for the treatment of migraines.
Comparateur actif: exploratory VNS
Dispositif: eVNS

The eVNS emits the company-proprietary low-voltage of 3~8 KHz sine-variant smooth-transition wave electrical signal bursts lasting near 0.9 ms via two flat stimulation contact surfaces. These bursts repeat once in intervals of approximately 40 ms. A potential benefit of this waveform is that it can produce less unpleasant skin sensations at a given current intensity and this may enhance the subject to tolerate higher current intensity than that of the conventional stimulation.
Comparateur factice: sham VNS
Dispositif: sVNS

The sVNS delivers mechanical motor vibrations to provide a similar perceptible stimulation feeling to the skin. No electrical stimulations are delivered. The device that delivers the sham stimulation is identical in appearance, weight, and user interface. A button to adjust "stimulation current" is also available in the sham device so as to allow the subject/caregiver to adjust the "stimulation current"

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change of gait
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

Timed UP and Go test: Participant sits back in a standard armchair with their back against the chair and hands resting on the armrests. Regular footwear and usual walking aids (like a cane or walker) are used. On the word "Go", the person stands up, walks a distance of 3 meters (10 feet) to a marked line or cone at a normal, safe pace, turns around, walks back to the chair, and sits down again. A stopwatch starts the moment the word "Go" is spoken and stops the moment the person's buttocks touch the seat. The results in second will be interpret to assist mobility and risk of falling. The longer the time, the high risk of fall
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits
Severity and progression of Parkinson's disease
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

Using Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale to motor and non-motor symptoms. Score from 0 to 4. 0 is normal while 4 is severe/marked impairment
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits
Quantitative Gait Assessment
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

Using an app to track the mobility of participants in a 20 sec walking
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits
Cognitive status
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

Using Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment to evaluate the cognitive status. score from 0-30. The lower the score, the more cognitive impaired.
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits
Change in mood
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

Using Geriatric depression scale which contain 15 questions. Score from 0-15. The higher the score, the more severe the depressed mood
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change of blood pressure
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits
Safety measures- record of adverse event and serious adverse event
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

To investigate any possibility and relativity of AE and SAE with the treatment
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits
Electrocardiogram
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

To investigate any possibility and relativity of the change of ECG with the treatment
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Blood-based biomarkers
Délai: Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits
Baseline, Day 1 stimulation visit, 4 week post-home stimulation visits and 8 week post-home stimulation visits

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

20 novembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 décembre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 juin 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

22 septembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 octobre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

2 novembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

3 novembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 novembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 novembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2025.519

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

only IPD used in the results publication will be shared

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner