Effectiveness of Adalimumab in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Patients With Distinct Co-morbidities (EPIC)
2017年5月12日 更新者：AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
This multicenter, post marketing observational study (PMOS) was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab over a period of 9 months as determined by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with distinct co-morbidities.
Secondary objectives of this study were to measure changes in psychological health via the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); changes in comorbidities with respect to gender; changes in quality of life using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); and evaluation of Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID).
調査の概要
状態
完了
条件
詳細な説明
Male or female participants ages 18 years of age and older for whom the treating physician had recently prescribed adalimumab were included in this study.
Adalimumab was prescribed in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization with regards to dose, population, and indication.
There were 5 planned visits during the study: baseline (Visit 1), 1 month (Visit 2), 3 months (Visit 3), 6 months (Visit 4), and 9 months (Visit 5).
研究の種類
観察的
入学 (実際)
246
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
サンプリング方法
非確率サンプル
調査対象母集団
Hospital, Dermatology
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants for whom adalimumab therapy is indicated and has been prescribed according to the product label and who meet the following criteria:
- Participant age ≥ 18 years
- Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis participants who have at last one co-morbid disease and/or symptom such as hypertension, psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist or other appropriate specialist, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome or depression (diagnosed by a medical specialist for psychology, neurology, or psychiatry)
- Adalimumab naïve participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis after unsatisfactory response, non tolerability, or contraindication of systemic therapies such as ciclosporin, methotrexate or PUVA ( psoralen + UVA) or after biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) failure (e.g.: infliximab, etanercept or ustekinumab)
- Participants of each country must fulfill any local treatment recommendation for use of bDMARD in psoriasis in their respective country. For Austria: participants must fulfill Austrian Treatment Recommendations for use of bDMARD in psoriasis (Chest X-ray and IGRA* interferon gamma release assay or PPD-skin test negative for tuberculosis)
- Participant is willing to give informed consent to anonymous data collection and their forwarding to AbbVie as well as to informed consent if required in different countries.
- Participant must be able and willing to self-administer adalimumab injections or have a qualified person available to administer Humira® syringe or Humira® Pen injections
Exclusion Criteria:
The following participants will not be included in this observational study:
- Participants who meet contraindications as outlined in the latest version of the Humira syringe® Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and Humira Pen® SPC
- Participants participating in another study program or clinical trial
- Participants who have been treated with Humira® before
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 観測モデル：コホート
- 時間の展望：見込みのある
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
|---|
|
Participants with psoriasis and at least one co-morbid disease
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with at least one co-morbid disease and/or symptom such as hypertension, psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist or other appropriate specialist, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome or depression
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 75% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Scores
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The DLQI questionnaire asks participants to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week, and includes the following parameters: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure activities, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment- related feelings.
Participants respond to 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the range of the total score is 0 to 30.
A score of 21 to 30 means that psoriasis has an extremely large effect on the participant's life whereas 0-1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 90% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 (PASI 100) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 100% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
The percentage of participants achieving MCID in the SF-36 PCS was defined as an increase in PCS of at least 3 points from the baseline score.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
時間枠：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
The percentage of participants achieving MCID in the SF-36 MCS was defined as an increase in MCS of at least 5 points from the baseline score.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
協力者
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
便利なリンク
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始
2011年8月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2016年5月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
2016年5月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2011年7月1日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2011年7月22日
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
2011年7月25日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2017年10月4日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2017年5月12日
最終確認日
2017年5月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- P12-770
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。