Effectiveness of Adalimumab in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Patients With Distinct Co-morbidities (EPIC)
12. Mai 2017 aktualisiert von: AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
This multicenter, post marketing observational study (PMOS) was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab over a period of 9 months as determined by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with distinct co-morbidities.
Secondary objectives of this study were to measure changes in psychological health via the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); changes in comorbidities with respect to gender; changes in quality of life using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); and evaluation of Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID).
Studienübersicht
Status
Abgeschlossen
Bedingungen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Male or female participants ages 18 years of age and older for whom the treating physician had recently prescribed adalimumab were included in this study.
Adalimumab was prescribed in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization with regards to dose, population, and indication.
There were 5 planned visits during the study: baseline (Visit 1), 1 month (Visit 2), 3 months (Visit 3), 6 months (Visit 4), and 9 months (Visit 5).
Studientyp
Beobachtungs
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
246
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Probenahmeverfahren
Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe
Studienpopulation
Hospital, Dermatology
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants for whom adalimumab therapy is indicated and has been prescribed according to the product label and who meet the following criteria:
- Participant age ≥ 18 years
- Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis participants who have at last one co-morbid disease and/or symptom such as hypertension, psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist or other appropriate specialist, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome or depression (diagnosed by a medical specialist for psychology, neurology, or psychiatry)
- Adalimumab naïve participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis after unsatisfactory response, non tolerability, or contraindication of systemic therapies such as ciclosporin, methotrexate or PUVA ( psoralen + UVA) or after biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) failure (e.g.: infliximab, etanercept or ustekinumab)
- Participants of each country must fulfill any local treatment recommendation for use of bDMARD in psoriasis in their respective country. For Austria: participants must fulfill Austrian Treatment Recommendations for use of bDMARD in psoriasis (Chest X-ray and IGRA* interferon gamma release assay or PPD-skin test negative for tuberculosis)
- Participant is willing to give informed consent to anonymous data collection and their forwarding to AbbVie as well as to informed consent if required in different countries.
- Participant must be able and willing to self-administer adalimumab injections or have a qualified person available to administer Humira® syringe or Humira® Pen injections
Exclusion Criteria:
The following participants will not be included in this observational study:
- Participants who meet contraindications as outlined in the latest version of the Humira syringe® Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and Humira Pen® SPC
- Participants participating in another study program or clinical trial
- Participants who have been treated with Humira® before
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Beobachtungsmodelle: Kohorte
- Zeitperspektiven: Interessent
Kohorten und Interventionen
Gruppe / Kohorte |
|---|
|
Participants with psoriasis and at least one co-morbid disease
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with at least one co-morbid disease and/or symptom such as hypertension, psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist or other appropriate specialist, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome or depression
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 75% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Scores
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The DLQI questionnaire asks participants to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week, and includes the following parameters: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure activities, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment- related feelings.
Participants respond to 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the range of the total score is 0 to 30.
A score of 21 to 30 means that psoriasis has an extremely large effect on the participant's life whereas 0-1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 90% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 (PASI 100) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 100% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
The percentage of participants achieving MCID in the SF-36 PCS was defined as an increase in PCS of at least 3 points from the baseline score.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
The percentage of participants achieving MCID in the SF-36 MCS was defined as an increase in MCS of at least 5 points from the baseline score.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Nützliche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
1. August 2011
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
1. Mai 2016
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
1. Mai 2016
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
1. Juli 2011
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
22. Juli 2011
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
25. Juli 2011
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
4. Oktober 2017
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
12. Mai 2017
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Mai 2017
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- P12-770
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .