Effectiveness of Adalimumab in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Patients With Distinct Co-morbidities (EPIC)
2017年5月12日 更新者：AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
This multicenter, post marketing observational study (PMOS) was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab over a period of 9 months as determined by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with distinct co-morbidities.
Secondary objectives of this study were to measure changes in psychological health via the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); changes in comorbidities with respect to gender; changes in quality of life using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); and evaluation of Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID).
研究概览
地位
完全的
条件
详细说明
Male or female participants ages 18 years of age and older for whom the treating physician had recently prescribed adalimumab were included in this study.
Adalimumab was prescribed in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization with regards to dose, population, and indication.
There were 5 planned visits during the study: baseline (Visit 1), 1 month (Visit 2), 3 months (Visit 3), 6 months (Visit 4), and 9 months (Visit 5).
研究类型
观察性的
注册 (实际的)
246
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
取样方法
非概率样本
研究人群
Hospital, Dermatology
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants for whom adalimumab therapy is indicated and has been prescribed according to the product label and who meet the following criteria:
- Participant age ≥ 18 years
- Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis participants who have at last one co-morbid disease and/or symptom such as hypertension, psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist or other appropriate specialist, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome or depression (diagnosed by a medical specialist for psychology, neurology, or psychiatry)
- Adalimumab naïve participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis after unsatisfactory response, non tolerability, or contraindication of systemic therapies such as ciclosporin, methotrexate or PUVA ( psoralen + UVA) or after biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) failure (e.g.: infliximab, etanercept or ustekinumab)
- Participants of each country must fulfill any local treatment recommendation for use of bDMARD in psoriasis in their respective country. For Austria: participants must fulfill Austrian Treatment Recommendations for use of bDMARD in psoriasis (Chest X-ray and IGRA* interferon gamma release assay or PPD-skin test negative for tuberculosis)
- Participant is willing to give informed consent to anonymous data collection and their forwarding to AbbVie as well as to informed consent if required in different countries.
- Participant must be able and willing to self-administer adalimumab injections or have a qualified person available to administer Humira® syringe or Humira® Pen injections
Exclusion Criteria:
The following participants will not be included in this observational study:
- Participants who meet contraindications as outlined in the latest version of the Humira syringe® Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and Humira Pen® SPC
- Participants participating in another study program or clinical trial
- Participants who have been treated with Humira® before
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 观测模型：队列
- 时间观点：预期
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
|---|
|
Participants with psoriasis and at least one co-morbid disease
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with at least one co-morbid disease and/or symptom such as hypertension, psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist or other appropriate specialist, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome or depression
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 75% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Scores
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The DLQI questionnaire asks participants to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week, and includes the following parameters: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure activities, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment- related feelings.
Participants respond to 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the range of the total score is 0 to 30.
A score of 21 to 30 means that psoriasis has an extremely large effect on the participant's life whereas 0-1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 90% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 (PASI 100) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The percentage of participants with a ≥ 100% reduction (improvement) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline was calculated.
PASI is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs.
The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72.
The higher the total score, the more severe the disease.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
The percentage of participants achieving MCID in the SF-36 PCS was defined as an increase in PCS of at least 3 points from the baseline score.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at 1, 3, 6, and 9 Months
大体时间：Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health.
Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36.
Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36.
Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best").
Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 9 months.
The percentage of participants achieving MCID in the SF-36 MCS was defined as an increase in MCS of at least 5 points from the baseline score.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, and 9
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
有用的网址
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始
2011年8月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2016年5月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2016年5月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2011年7月1日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2011年7月22日
首次发布 (估计)
2011年7月25日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2017年10月4日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2017年5月12日
最后验证
2017年5月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- P12-770
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.