Cancer & Chemotherapy Symptom Management Using an Automated Telephone Reporting System
2017年2月28日 更新者：Kathleen Mooney、University of Utah
Telephone Linked Care for Cancer Symptom Management
The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a computer-based automated symptom monitoring telephone system used by patients who received chemotherapy for their cancer to communicate unrelieved symptoms they experienced to their oncology providers.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a computer-based automated symptom monitoring telephone system used by patients who received chemotherapy for their cancer to communicate unrelieved symptoms they experienced to their oncology providers.
The symptoms monitored in the project were nausea/vomiting, pain, sore mouth, diarrhea, constipation, depressed mood, anxiety, trouble sleeping, and fatigue.
The study randomly assigned participants into either the intervention group or the group that received usual care from their oncology providers without alert notifications.
All participants called the automated system daily to report their symptom presence, severity, and distress.
When participants in the intervention group rated symptoms at moderate (4-7) to severe (8-10) levels an e-mail alert report of their symptom information was sent to the participant's medical oncologist and oncology nurse.
The usual care group also reported symptoms daily to the automated system but their information was not sent to the providers.
Participants in the usual care group were told daily to call their oncology provider if they had concerns about their symptoms.
The two study groups were compared over chemotherapy cycles 2 and 3 on symptom presence, severity, and distress.
Functional status, patient reported degree of symptom interference with normal activities, and work attendance if they had indicated that they worked during their treatment were also recorded.
In addition, the groups were compared for the number and purpose of unscheduled patient-provider contacts, visits to the emergency department or urgent care facility, and unscheduled hospitalizations.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
250
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston、Massachusetts、アメリカ、02118
- Boston Medical Center
-
-
South Carolina
-
Greer、South Carolina、アメリカ、29650
- South Carolina Community Oncology Practice
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City、Utah、アメリカ、84112
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (18 or older)
- Histological Diagnosis of Cancer
- Life Expectancy of at least 6 months
- Cognitively able to participate (verified by provider team)
- Initiated a course of new Chemotherapy that is planned for a minimum of 3 cycles
- Had Poorly controlled symptoms during the first cycle of chemotherapy
- Care under the direction of one of the designated provider teams
- English or Spanish speaking
- Has access to a telephone on a daily basis
- Able to use the telephone unassisted
Exclusion Criteria:
- Receiving concurrent radiation therapy because they would be in daily contact with oncology care providers.
- Patients seeing the provider team for recommendation of chemotherapy regimen but other providers then administer treatment at different site
- Patients receiving a treatment regimen with only biotherapy agents or agents not associated with the symptoms monitored
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：支持療法
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Provider Unrelieved Symptom Alert
Patients in the intervention arm called the automated monitoring system daily to report presence, severity and distress on a 1-10 scale for nine symptoms.
The system immediately sent an emailed symptom alert report to their oncologist and oncology nurse if symptoms exceeded preset thresholds (moderate to severe levels).
Two thresholds were set: a simple alert when severity or distress was 4 or greater on the 10 point scale and trend alerts based on a pattern of moderate severity over several days.
|
The Provider Unrelieved Symptom Alert intervention sent an automatic symptom report to oncology providers (both physician and nurse) when the patient reported symptoms at a moderate to severe level (4-10 on a 0-10 scale).
The oncology providers used their clinical judgement in terms of what they did with the information received.
There was no prescribed response as part of the intervention.
|
|
介入なし：Attentional Control Usual Care Group
Patients in the usual care group called the automated monitoring system daily to report presence, severity and distress (1-10 scale) on 9 symptoms and also measured symptom interference with daily activities, functional status, work attendance, and unscheduled provider visits, urgent care and emergency department visits, and unscheduled hospitalizations.
The usual care group received equivalent contact time with the automated system including identical voice and assessment questions.
Data were not available for clinical action and not reported to the oncology providers.
On every call, usual care participants were reminded to call their oncology provider if they had symptom concerns, which is the usual practice in oncology settings to address unrelieved symptoms.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient reported symptom levels on a 0-10 scale
時間枠：patients report symptoms daily for the duration of the study, an expected average of 6 weeks
|
During daily automated calls, patients provided information about common chemotherapy symptoms.
|
patients report symptoms daily for the duration of the study, an expected average of 6 weeks
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Medical Encounters Telephone Interview
時間枠：participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
|
When a patient reports during their daily phone call with the automated symptom monitoring system that they had been in contact with a health care provider, the research staff would conduct a short telephone interview to collect data about the nature of the medical encounter including whether the medical encounter was related to the symptoms being monitored by the system.
|
participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
|
|
Functional Status
時間枠：monthly for the duration of the study, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
|
The SF-12 was administered monthly to measure functional status.
|
monthly for the duration of the study, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
|
|
Work Attendance
時間枠：reported daily, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
|
Patients who indicated at study enrollment that they planned to work during treatment answered a yes/no question during the automated symptom monitoring system call to report whether or not they worked the previous day.
|
reported daily, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient End of Study Telephone Interview
時間枠：administered at the end of participation in the study, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
|
An End of Study Telephone Interview was conducted at the end of a patient's participation in the project to obtain data on patient satisfaction with the symptom monitoring system and to obtain suggestions for improvement of the system.
|
administered at the end of participation in the study, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
|
|
Provider End of Study Interview
時間枠：Once, at the end of participation which is an expected average of 24 months
|
At the end of the study, participating providers were interviewed regarding the acceptability and use of the symptom alert reports and their suggestions for improvement.
|
Once, at the end of participation which is an expected average of 24 months
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Kathleen H Mooney, PhD、University of Utah
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始
2001年4月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2004年3月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
2004年3月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2013年10月22日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2013年11月1日
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
2013年11月8日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2017年3月1日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2017年2月28日
最終確認日
2017年2月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- 7846-00
- R01CA089474 (米国 NIH グラント/契約)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。