Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Cancer & Chemotherapy Symptom Management Using an Automated Telephone Reporting System

28. Februar 2017 aktualisiert von: Kathleen Mooney, University of Utah

Telephone Linked Care for Cancer Symptom Management

The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a computer-based automated symptom monitoring telephone system used by patients who received chemotherapy for their cancer to communicate unrelieved symptoms they experienced to their oncology providers.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a computer-based automated symptom monitoring telephone system used by patients who received chemotherapy for their cancer to communicate unrelieved symptoms they experienced to their oncology providers. The symptoms monitored in the project were nausea/vomiting, pain, sore mouth, diarrhea, constipation, depressed mood, anxiety, trouble sleeping, and fatigue. The study randomly assigned participants into either the intervention group or the group that received usual care from their oncology providers without alert notifications. All participants called the automated system daily to report their symptom presence, severity, and distress. When participants in the intervention group rated symptoms at moderate (4-7) to severe (8-10) levels an e-mail alert report of their symptom information was sent to the participant's medical oncologist and oncology nurse. The usual care group also reported symptoms daily to the automated system but their information was not sent to the providers. Participants in the usual care group were told daily to call their oncology provider if they had concerns about their symptoms. The two study groups were compared over chemotherapy cycles 2 and 3 on symptom presence, severity, and distress. Functional status, patient reported degree of symptom interference with normal activities, and work attendance if they had indicated that they worked during their treatment were also recorded. In addition, the groups were compared for the number and purpose of unscheduled patient-provider contacts, visits to the emergency department or urgent care facility, and unscheduled hospitalizations.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

250

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Vereinigte Staaten, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center
    • South Carolina
      • Greer, South Carolina, Vereinigte Staaten, 29650
        • South Carolina Community Oncology Practice
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, Vereinigte Staaten, 84112
        • University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (18 or older)
  • Histological Diagnosis of Cancer
  • Life Expectancy of at least 6 months
  • Cognitively able to participate (verified by provider team)
  • Initiated a course of new Chemotherapy that is planned for a minimum of 3 cycles
  • Had Poorly controlled symptoms during the first cycle of chemotherapy
  • Care under the direction of one of the designated provider teams
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Has access to a telephone on a daily basis
  • Able to use the telephone unassisted

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving concurrent radiation therapy because they would be in daily contact with oncology care providers.
  • Patients seeing the provider team for recommendation of chemotherapy regimen but other providers then administer treatment at different site
  • Patients receiving a treatment regimen with only biotherapy agents or agents not associated with the symptoms monitored

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Provider Unrelieved Symptom Alert
Patients in the intervention arm called the automated monitoring system daily to report presence, severity and distress on a 1-10 scale for nine symptoms. The system immediately sent an emailed symptom alert report to their oncologist and oncology nurse if symptoms exceeded preset thresholds (moderate to severe levels). Two thresholds were set: a simple alert when severity or distress was 4 or greater on the 10 point scale and trend alerts based on a pattern of moderate severity over several days.
The Provider Unrelieved Symptom Alert intervention sent an automatic symptom report to oncology providers (both physician and nurse) when the patient reported symptoms at a moderate to severe level (4-10 on a 0-10 scale). The oncology providers used their clinical judgement in terms of what they did with the information received. There was no prescribed response as part of the intervention.
Kein Eingriff: Attentional Control Usual Care Group
Patients in the usual care group called the automated monitoring system daily to report presence, severity and distress (1-10 scale) on 9 symptoms and also measured symptom interference with daily activities, functional status, work attendance, and unscheduled provider visits, urgent care and emergency department visits, and unscheduled hospitalizations. The usual care group received equivalent contact time with the automated system including identical voice and assessment questions. Data were not available for clinical action and not reported to the oncology providers. On every call, usual care participants were reminded to call their oncology provider if they had symptom concerns, which is the usual practice in oncology settings to address unrelieved symptoms.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Patient reported symptom levels on a 0-10 scale
Zeitfenster: patients report symptoms daily for the duration of the study, an expected average of 6 weeks
During daily automated calls, patients provided information about common chemotherapy symptoms.
patients report symptoms daily for the duration of the study, an expected average of 6 weeks

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Medical Encounters Telephone Interview
Zeitfenster: participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
When a patient reports during their daily phone call with the automated symptom monitoring system that they had been in contact with a health care provider, the research staff would conduct a short telephone interview to collect data about the nature of the medical encounter including whether the medical encounter was related to the symptoms being monitored by the system.
participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
Functional Status
Zeitfenster: monthly for the duration of the study, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
The SF-12 was administered monthly to measure functional status.
monthly for the duration of the study, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
Work Attendance
Zeitfenster: reported daily, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
Patients who indicated at study enrollment that they planned to work during treatment answered a yes/no question during the automated symptom monitoring system call to report whether or not they worked the previous day.
reported daily, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Patient End of Study Telephone Interview
Zeitfenster: administered at the end of participation in the study, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
An End of Study Telephone Interview was conducted at the end of a patient's participation in the project to obtain data on patient satisfaction with the symptom monitoring system and to obtain suggestions for improvement of the system.
administered at the end of participation in the study, participants will be followed for an expected average of 6 weeks
Provider End of Study Interview
Zeitfenster: Once, at the end of participation which is an expected average of 24 months
At the end of the study, participating providers were interviewed regarding the acceptability and use of the symptom alert reports and their suggestions for improvement.
Once, at the end of participation which is an expected average of 24 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Kathleen H Mooney, PhD, University of Utah

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. April 2001

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. März 2004

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. März 2004

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

22. Oktober 2013

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

1. November 2013

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

8. November 2013

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

1. März 2017

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

28. Februar 2017

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Februar 2017

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 7846-00
  • R01CA089474 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

3
Abonnieren