このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

IMPACCT for Kids' Care (IMPACCT)

2016年4月26日 更新者:OCHIN, Inc.

Innovative Methods for Parents And Clinics to Create Tools (IMPACCT) for Kids' Care

Health insurance is important for children. Public insurance programs are available to many children, but some families report being confused about how to get and keep this insurance. Community Health Centers (CHCs) can help families get and keep health insurance for their children.

The investigators will work with families, policy makers, and community health care providers and staff to develop and test new computer health information technology (IT) tools to help health care clinics find pediatric patients in need of insurance and communicate with their families about public insurance programs. These tools will be based on technologies currently used to help patients and clinics manage chronic diseases. The investigators will test the tools by comparing four clinics using the tools and four clinics not using the tools. The investigators will look to see if children in the clinics using the tools are more likely to have health insurance and also more likely to receive certain health care services, compared to children in the clinics without such tools. The investigators will also look at health insurance rates and health care services for a larger population of Oregon children.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Summary of protocol changes made:

  1. Changes to eligibility criteria. We changed patient eligibility to include all pediatric patients through age 19 with >=1 clinical visit in the study period. These decisions were based on: 1) at age 20, individuals are no longer eligible for children's Medicaid or CHIP in Oregon; 2) identification of PCP assignment was difficult in the EHR.
  2. Added second comparison group/study arm. In the intervention clinics, the tools were used on a smaller number of pediatric patients than anticipated, and there were significant demographic differences between intervention and control site patients, despite the clinics being matched. Thus we added a second comparison group, "within-clinic comparison patients" as pediatric patients with >=1 visit at an intervention clinic in the study period but on whom the tools were NOT used. This provided a comparison group that accounted for clinic-level effects and was more demographically similar to the "intervention patients" on whom tools were used.
  3. Revision of Aim 3 - CHIPRA recommended care assessment. We did not pursue assessment of CHIPRA quality care measures due to 1) limited follow-up time due to the need to implement iterative modifications to the study HIT tools, and 2) the tools were used on a smaller set of pediatric patients than anticipated, thus we had a very limited denominator for these analyses.

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (実際)

27251

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

19年歳未満 (子、大人)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

受講資格のある性別

全て

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

For the analysis of the primary study outcome, our study population will include all children who are "established" patients at an intervention or control clinic. Children will be considered "established" patients if they had >=1 clinical visit at a study clinic during the 18-month study period.

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 0-19
  • established patient (>=1 clinical visit at a study clinic in the assessment period)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age > 19
  • not an established patient

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

コホートと介入

グループ/コホート
介入・治療
Intervention patients
Community Health Centers that implemented health insurance outreach IT tools: active patients on whom tools were used
IT tools that support Community Health Centers in children's health insurance outreach efforts ("insurance outreach IT tools"), adapted from tools proven to support chronic disease management.
Within-clinic comparison patients
Community Health Centers that implemented health insurance outreach IT tools: active patients on whom tools were not used
Control clinic comparison patients
Matched Community Health Centers that did not implement health insurance outreach IT tools: active patients

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Percent of Study Period Covered by Medicaid
時間枠:6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation
Percent of total days in 22-month assessment period that each child was covered by Medicaid insurance. Assessed using state administrative records linked to EHR data; this outcome was assessed among the subset of participants with a Medicaid ID (and thus could be linked between the two data sources).
6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation
Proportion of Patients Who Gained Medicaid Coverage
時間枠:6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation
Proportion of participants who gained Medicaid coverage after a period of uninsurance. Assessed using state administrative records linked to EHR data; this outcome was assessed among the subset of participants with a Medicaid ID (and thus could be linked between the two data sources) and who had partial coverage during the study period (i.e., patients with 100% coverage were not 'eligible' to gain coverage).
6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation
Proportion of Patients Who Lost Medicaid Coverage
時間枠:6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation
Proportion of participants who lost Medicaid coverage after a period of insurance. Assessed using state administrative records linked to EHR data; this outcome was assessed among the subset of participants with a Medicaid ID (and thus could be linked between the two data sources) and who had partial coverage during the study period (i.e., patients with 100% coverage were not 'eligible' to lose coverage).
6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Jennifer DeVoe, MD, DPhil、OCHIN, OHSU
  • スタディディレクター:Christine Nelson, RN, PhD、OCHIN, Inc.

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2013年3月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2016年2月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2016年2月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2014年11月5日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2014年11月20日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2014年11月21日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2016年6月2日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2016年4月26日

最終確認日

2016年4月1日

詳しくは

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する