このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Improving Surgical Decision-making in Young Women With Breast Cancer

2020年6月26日 更新者:Shoshana M. Rosenberg、Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

The overall goal of this study is to qualitatively assess the surgical decision-making process from both the patient and physician perspective

  1. Conduct short in-person interviews with young women prior to surgery
  2. Conduct focus groups with breast cancer survivors about their surgical decision and experience
  3. Interview surgical oncologists, plastic surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists about their experiences and how they communicate with breast cancer patients about local therapy decisions
  4. To survey women about surgical decision-making prior to and after their consult in conjunction with pilot testing of a web-based decision aid to support high quality surgical decision-making in newly diagnosed young women with breast cancer.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Breast cancer in young women: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women younger than age 40 in the United States, with approximately 14,000 new cases each year. Young women face unique psychosocial challenges, most notably fertility, sexuality, and image concerns and are at a life stage where education, career, and family are important priorities. Concern about these issues may contribute to the greater psychosocial distress seen in younger women at both diagnosis and in follow-up compared with older women. Importantly, these concerns may also influence treatment decisions including receipt of chemotherapy, adherence to endocrine therapy, and surgical decisions. Thus, attending to the unique issues of young women may enhance not only quality of care and quality of life (QOL) but also potentially disease outcomes.

Surgical management of breast cancer: Standard loco-regional management of breast cancer entails partial mastectomy (i.e., breast conserving surgery) followed by radiation or mastectomy with or without radiation. The decision depends on a number of factors including extent of disease, family history, BRCA mutation status, and personal preference. In recent years, an increasing number of women have elected to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in conjunction with surgery of the affected breast (usually choosing bilateral mastectomy), despite a lack of clear evidence for survival benefit from this procedure in the vast majority of women. In weighing the benefits and risks of CPM, one must consider the absolute risk reduction of a new primary breast cancer (usually relatively modest in the average risk survivor), the long and short-term risks of this additional surgery including potential complications (bilateral mastectomy is associated with a greater risk of surgical complications) and the impact on QOL. At the same time, one must consider the competing risk of systemic recurrence of a woman's initial breast cancer. Young women, in particular, have the greatest risk of systemic recurrence and death from their original cancer, lowering the likelihood of benefit of CPM in preventing a new primary breast cancer. However, while CPM rates have increased among all breast cancer patients, increased rates of CPM are particularly pronounced among the youngest women with breast cancer, with several studies identifying young age at diagnosis as one of the strongest determinants of CPM.Physicians and researchers have been observing and discussing this trend for a number of years and yet little has been done to intervene.

The goal of the proposed research is to better understand and improve the surgical decision process in young women with breast cancer. Using qualitative research methods, we will comprehensively assess patient experiences - both patients who have had CPM and patients who did not - as well as physician perspectives regarding this decision. Based on these findings, the investigators will determine how to best improve the quality of the process, e.g., by correcting misperceptions, setting realistic expectations regarding the impact of surgery (including reconstruction) on QOL, improving communication with health care providers, and better management of anxiety surrounding diagnosis. This qualitative research is designed to build on prior quantitative analyses, by gaining an in depth perspective through focus groups and interviews, about certain issues identified as impacting the surgical decision process, including anxiety, fear of recurrence, and patient-physician communication.

Collectively, results from the qualitative assessment will inform a future phase of this research involving the design and subsequent development of a decision aid to help women make informed decisions about their breast cancer surgery.

The goal of this second phase of the research is to survey women about surgical decision-making prior to and after their consult in conjunction with pilot testing of a web-based decision aid to support high quality surgical decision-making in newly diagnosed young women with breast cancer.

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (実際)

145

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~80年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

女性

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

Young Women with a history of breast cancer and providers who care for them.

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients for key informant interviews-

  1. Newly diagnosed women with Stage 0-3 breast cancer
  2. Between the ages of 18 and 40 who are seen at DFCI and have not yet had their primary breast cancer surgery.

Patients for focus groups:

  1. diagnosis of Stage 0-3 breast cancer at age 40 and younger
  2. currently between the ages of 18-43
  3. English-speaking
  4. 1-3 years from diagnosis
  5. Had breast cancer surgery
  6. no evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease.

Providers:

Must care for women who have breast cancer. Can be surgeons, surgical oncologists, medical and/or radiation oncologists

Patients for Surgical Decision Making Pilot

  1. Women with newly-diagnosed, unilateral Stage 0-3 breast cancer
  2. Between the ages of 18 and 40
  3. Who are seen by a surgeon at DFCI/BWH or Faulkner Hospital
  4. English speaking
  5. Have not yet had their primary breast cancer surgery

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 観測モデル:他の
  • 時間の展望:他の

コホートと介入

グループ/コホート
介入・治療
Key Informant interviews
20 in-person or phone qualitative interviews with patients.
qualitative data collection
Focus Groups
four qualitative focus groups of 6-10 women each.
qualitative data collection
Physician Interviews
physician qualitative interviews over the telephone.
qualitative data collection
Usual care cohort (pilot)
50 women who will be surveyed before and after their surgical consult
survey pre and post-surgical consult
Decision aid cohort (pilot)
50 women who will be surveyed before and after their surgical consult and will also be sent a web-based decision aid
survey pre and post-surgical consult
web-based decision aid post-surgical consult

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Thematic summary from the data gathered from the use of a moderator guide (series of probing questions) that inquires about the experiences surrounding the surgical decision-making process from both the patient and physician perspective
時間枠:1 year
The goal of the proposed research is to better understand and improve the surgical decision process in young women with breast cancer. Using qualitative research methods, we will comprehensively assess patient experiences - both patients who have had CPM and patients who did not - as well as physician perspectives regarding this decision.
1 year
Breast cancer knowledge
時間枠:2 weeks
Knowledge will be assessed using selected questions from the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument (BCS-DQI), an instrument designed to evaluate the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions as well as additional true/false questions related to side effects of radiation.
2 weeks
Decisional conflict
時間枠:2 weeks
Decisional conflict will be measured with the SURE scale. The SURE scale is composed of four items from the Decisional Conflict Scale that measure patients' uncertainty about which treatment choice and factors contributing to uncertainty.
2 weeks
Anxiety
時間枠:2 weeks
Anxiety will be assessed using the PROMIS Emotional Distress - Anxiety - Short Form.
2 weeks
Treatment goals and preferences
時間枠:2 weeks
have been adapted from the BCS-DQI. We will ask women to mark on a scale (not important - very important) the importance of several reasons in relation to their decision about surgery as well as concerns (not all concerned-very concerned) about local therapy.
2 weeks
Perception of decision process
時間枠:2 weeks
Perception of the decision process will be assessed with an adapted version of the Control Preferences Scale.
2 weeks

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Usability of decision aid (DA)
時間枠:2 weeks-1 month
Assessment of what patients did and did not like about the DA, ways they think the DA can be improved, and how they felt the DA affected communication with their physician.
2 weeks-1 month

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Shoshana Rosenberg, ScD、Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2016年2月19日

一次修了 (実際)

2020年4月10日

研究の完了 (実際)

2020年4月10日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2015年12月20日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2015年12月29日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2015年12月31日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2020年6月29日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2020年6月26日

最終確認日

2020年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 15-288
  • 1K01HS023680-01A1 (米国 AHRQ グラント/契約)

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する