此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Improving Surgical Decision-making in Young Women With Breast Cancer

2020年6月26日 更新者:Shoshana M. Rosenberg、Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

The overall goal of this study is to qualitatively assess the surgical decision-making process from both the patient and physician perspective

  1. Conduct short in-person interviews with young women prior to surgery
  2. Conduct focus groups with breast cancer survivors about their surgical decision and experience
  3. Interview surgical oncologists, plastic surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists about their experiences and how they communicate with breast cancer patients about local therapy decisions
  4. To survey women about surgical decision-making prior to and after their consult in conjunction with pilot testing of a web-based decision aid to support high quality surgical decision-making in newly diagnosed young women with breast cancer.

研究概览

详细说明

Breast cancer in young women: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women younger than age 40 in the United States, with approximately 14,000 new cases each year. Young women face unique psychosocial challenges, most notably fertility, sexuality, and image concerns and are at a life stage where education, career, and family are important priorities. Concern about these issues may contribute to the greater psychosocial distress seen in younger women at both diagnosis and in follow-up compared with older women. Importantly, these concerns may also influence treatment decisions including receipt of chemotherapy, adherence to endocrine therapy, and surgical decisions. Thus, attending to the unique issues of young women may enhance not only quality of care and quality of life (QOL) but also potentially disease outcomes.

Surgical management of breast cancer: Standard loco-regional management of breast cancer entails partial mastectomy (i.e., breast conserving surgery) followed by radiation or mastectomy with or without radiation. The decision depends on a number of factors including extent of disease, family history, BRCA mutation status, and personal preference. In recent years, an increasing number of women have elected to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in conjunction with surgery of the affected breast (usually choosing bilateral mastectomy), despite a lack of clear evidence for survival benefit from this procedure in the vast majority of women. In weighing the benefits and risks of CPM, one must consider the absolute risk reduction of a new primary breast cancer (usually relatively modest in the average risk survivor), the long and short-term risks of this additional surgery including potential complications (bilateral mastectomy is associated with a greater risk of surgical complications) and the impact on QOL. At the same time, one must consider the competing risk of systemic recurrence of a woman's initial breast cancer. Young women, in particular, have the greatest risk of systemic recurrence and death from their original cancer, lowering the likelihood of benefit of CPM in preventing a new primary breast cancer. However, while CPM rates have increased among all breast cancer patients, increased rates of CPM are particularly pronounced among the youngest women with breast cancer, with several studies identifying young age at diagnosis as one of the strongest determinants of CPM.Physicians and researchers have been observing and discussing this trend for a number of years and yet little has been done to intervene.

The goal of the proposed research is to better understand and improve the surgical decision process in young women with breast cancer. Using qualitative research methods, we will comprehensively assess patient experiences - both patients who have had CPM and patients who did not - as well as physician perspectives regarding this decision. Based on these findings, the investigators will determine how to best improve the quality of the process, e.g., by correcting misperceptions, setting realistic expectations regarding the impact of surgery (including reconstruction) on QOL, improving communication with health care providers, and better management of anxiety surrounding diagnosis. This qualitative research is designed to build on prior quantitative analyses, by gaining an in depth perspective through focus groups and interviews, about certain issues identified as impacting the surgical decision process, including anxiety, fear of recurrence, and patient-physician communication.

Collectively, results from the qualitative assessment will inform a future phase of this research involving the design and subsequent development of a decision aid to help women make informed decisions about their breast cancer surgery.

The goal of this second phase of the research is to survey women about surgical decision-making prior to and after their consult in conjunction with pilot testing of a web-based decision aid to support high quality surgical decision-making in newly diagnosed young women with breast cancer.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

145

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 80年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

女性

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Young Women with a history of breast cancer and providers who care for them.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients for key informant interviews-

  1. Newly diagnosed women with Stage 0-3 breast cancer
  2. Between the ages of 18 and 40 who are seen at DFCI and have not yet had their primary breast cancer surgery.

Patients for focus groups:

  1. diagnosis of Stage 0-3 breast cancer at age 40 and younger
  2. currently between the ages of 18-43
  3. English-speaking
  4. 1-3 years from diagnosis
  5. Had breast cancer surgery
  6. no evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease.

Providers:

Must care for women who have breast cancer. Can be surgeons, surgical oncologists, medical and/or radiation oncologists

Patients for Surgical Decision Making Pilot

  1. Women with newly-diagnosed, unilateral Stage 0-3 breast cancer
  2. Between the ages of 18 and 40
  3. Who are seen by a surgeon at DFCI/BWH or Faulkner Hospital
  4. English speaking
  5. Have not yet had their primary breast cancer surgery

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 观测模型:其他
  • 时间观点:其他

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Key Informant interviews
20 in-person or phone qualitative interviews with patients.
qualitative data collection
Focus Groups
four qualitative focus groups of 6-10 women each.
qualitative data collection
Physician Interviews
physician qualitative interviews over the telephone.
qualitative data collection
Usual care cohort (pilot)
50 women who will be surveyed before and after their surgical consult
survey pre and post-surgical consult
Decision aid cohort (pilot)
50 women who will be surveyed before and after their surgical consult and will also be sent a web-based decision aid
survey pre and post-surgical consult
web-based decision aid post-surgical consult

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Thematic summary from the data gathered from the use of a moderator guide (series of probing questions) that inquires about the experiences surrounding the surgical decision-making process from both the patient and physician perspective
大体时间:1 year
The goal of the proposed research is to better understand and improve the surgical decision process in young women with breast cancer. Using qualitative research methods, we will comprehensively assess patient experiences - both patients who have had CPM and patients who did not - as well as physician perspectives regarding this decision.
1 year
Breast cancer knowledge
大体时间:2 weeks
Knowledge will be assessed using selected questions from the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument (BCS-DQI), an instrument designed to evaluate the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions as well as additional true/false questions related to side effects of radiation.
2 weeks
Decisional conflict
大体时间:2 weeks
Decisional conflict will be measured with the SURE scale. The SURE scale is composed of four items from the Decisional Conflict Scale that measure patients' uncertainty about which treatment choice and factors contributing to uncertainty.
2 weeks
Anxiety
大体时间:2 weeks
Anxiety will be assessed using the PROMIS Emotional Distress - Anxiety - Short Form.
2 weeks
Treatment goals and preferences
大体时间:2 weeks
have been adapted from the BCS-DQI. We will ask women to mark on a scale (not important - very important) the importance of several reasons in relation to their decision about surgery as well as concerns (not all concerned-very concerned) about local therapy.
2 weeks
Perception of decision process
大体时间:2 weeks
Perception of the decision process will be assessed with an adapted version of the Control Preferences Scale.
2 weeks

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Usability of decision aid (DA)
大体时间:2 weeks-1 month
Assessment of what patients did and did not like about the DA, ways they think the DA can be improved, and how they felt the DA affected communication with their physician.
2 weeks-1 month

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Shoshana Rosenberg, ScD、Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2016年2月19日

初级完成 (实际的)

2020年4月10日

研究完成 (实际的)

2020年4月10日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2015年12月20日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2015年12月29日

首次发布 (估计)

2015年12月31日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年6月29日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2020年6月26日

最后验证

2020年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 15-288
  • 1K01HS023680-01A1 (美国 AHRQ 拨款/合同)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

qualitative data collection的临床试验

3
订阅