Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Improving Surgical Decision-making in Young Women With Breast Cancer

26. juni 2020 opdateret af: Shoshana M. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

The overall goal of this study is to qualitatively assess the surgical decision-making process from both the patient and physician perspective

  1. Conduct short in-person interviews with young women prior to surgery
  2. Conduct focus groups with breast cancer survivors about their surgical decision and experience
  3. Interview surgical oncologists, plastic surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists about their experiences and how they communicate with breast cancer patients about local therapy decisions
  4. To survey women about surgical decision-making prior to and after their consult in conjunction with pilot testing of a web-based decision aid to support high quality surgical decision-making in newly diagnosed young women with breast cancer.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Breast cancer in young women: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women younger than age 40 in the United States, with approximately 14,000 new cases each year. Young women face unique psychosocial challenges, most notably fertility, sexuality, and image concerns and are at a life stage where education, career, and family are important priorities. Concern about these issues may contribute to the greater psychosocial distress seen in younger women at both diagnosis and in follow-up compared with older women. Importantly, these concerns may also influence treatment decisions including receipt of chemotherapy, adherence to endocrine therapy, and surgical decisions. Thus, attending to the unique issues of young women may enhance not only quality of care and quality of life (QOL) but also potentially disease outcomes.

Surgical management of breast cancer: Standard loco-regional management of breast cancer entails partial mastectomy (i.e., breast conserving surgery) followed by radiation or mastectomy with or without radiation. The decision depends on a number of factors including extent of disease, family history, BRCA mutation status, and personal preference. In recent years, an increasing number of women have elected to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in conjunction with surgery of the affected breast (usually choosing bilateral mastectomy), despite a lack of clear evidence for survival benefit from this procedure in the vast majority of women. In weighing the benefits and risks of CPM, one must consider the absolute risk reduction of a new primary breast cancer (usually relatively modest in the average risk survivor), the long and short-term risks of this additional surgery including potential complications (bilateral mastectomy is associated with a greater risk of surgical complications) and the impact on QOL. At the same time, one must consider the competing risk of systemic recurrence of a woman's initial breast cancer. Young women, in particular, have the greatest risk of systemic recurrence and death from their original cancer, lowering the likelihood of benefit of CPM in preventing a new primary breast cancer. However, while CPM rates have increased among all breast cancer patients, increased rates of CPM are particularly pronounced among the youngest women with breast cancer, with several studies identifying young age at diagnosis as one of the strongest determinants of CPM.Physicians and researchers have been observing and discussing this trend for a number of years and yet little has been done to intervene.

The goal of the proposed research is to better understand and improve the surgical decision process in young women with breast cancer. Using qualitative research methods, we will comprehensively assess patient experiences - both patients who have had CPM and patients who did not - as well as physician perspectives regarding this decision. Based on these findings, the investigators will determine how to best improve the quality of the process, e.g., by correcting misperceptions, setting realistic expectations regarding the impact of surgery (including reconstruction) on QOL, improving communication with health care providers, and better management of anxiety surrounding diagnosis. This qualitative research is designed to build on prior quantitative analyses, by gaining an in depth perspective through focus groups and interviews, about certain issues identified as impacting the surgical decision process, including anxiety, fear of recurrence, and patient-physician communication.

Collectively, results from the qualitative assessment will inform a future phase of this research involving the design and subsequent development of a decision aid to help women make informed decisions about their breast cancer surgery.

The goal of this second phase of the research is to survey women about surgical decision-making prior to and after their consult in conjunction with pilot testing of a web-based decision aid to support high quality surgical decision-making in newly diagnosed young women with breast cancer.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

145

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 80 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Kvinde

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Young Women with a history of breast cancer and providers who care for them.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients for key informant interviews-

  1. Newly diagnosed women with Stage 0-3 breast cancer
  2. Between the ages of 18 and 40 who are seen at DFCI and have not yet had their primary breast cancer surgery.

Patients for focus groups:

  1. diagnosis of Stage 0-3 breast cancer at age 40 and younger
  2. currently between the ages of 18-43
  3. English-speaking
  4. 1-3 years from diagnosis
  5. Had breast cancer surgery
  6. no evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease.

Providers:

Must care for women who have breast cancer. Can be surgeons, surgical oncologists, medical and/or radiation oncologists

Patients for Surgical Decision Making Pilot

  1. Women with newly-diagnosed, unilateral Stage 0-3 breast cancer
  2. Between the ages of 18 and 40
  3. Who are seen by a surgeon at DFCI/BWH or Faulkner Hospital
  4. English speaking
  5. Have not yet had their primary breast cancer surgery

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: Andet
  • Tidsperspektiver: Andet

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
Key Informant interviews
20 in-person or phone qualitative interviews with patients.
qualitative data collection
Focus Groups
four qualitative focus groups of 6-10 women each.
qualitative data collection
Physician Interviews
physician qualitative interviews over the telephone.
qualitative data collection
Usual care cohort (pilot)
50 women who will be surveyed before and after their surgical consult
survey pre and post-surgical consult
Decision aid cohort (pilot)
50 women who will be surveyed before and after their surgical consult and will also be sent a web-based decision aid
survey pre and post-surgical consult
web-based decision aid post-surgical consult

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Thematic summary from the data gathered from the use of a moderator guide (series of probing questions) that inquires about the experiences surrounding the surgical decision-making process from both the patient and physician perspective
Tidsramme: 1 year
The goal of the proposed research is to better understand and improve the surgical decision process in young women with breast cancer. Using qualitative research methods, we will comprehensively assess patient experiences - both patients who have had CPM and patients who did not - as well as physician perspectives regarding this decision.
1 year
Breast cancer knowledge
Tidsramme: 2 weeks
Knowledge will be assessed using selected questions from the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument (BCS-DQI), an instrument designed to evaluate the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions as well as additional true/false questions related to side effects of radiation.
2 weeks
Decisional conflict
Tidsramme: 2 weeks
Decisional conflict will be measured with the SURE scale. The SURE scale is composed of four items from the Decisional Conflict Scale that measure patients' uncertainty about which treatment choice and factors contributing to uncertainty.
2 weeks
Anxiety
Tidsramme: 2 weeks
Anxiety will be assessed using the PROMIS Emotional Distress - Anxiety - Short Form.
2 weeks
Treatment goals and preferences
Tidsramme: 2 weeks
have been adapted from the BCS-DQI. We will ask women to mark on a scale (not important - very important) the importance of several reasons in relation to their decision about surgery as well as concerns (not all concerned-very concerned) about local therapy.
2 weeks
Perception of decision process
Tidsramme: 2 weeks
Perception of the decision process will be assessed with an adapted version of the Control Preferences Scale.
2 weeks

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Usability of decision aid (DA)
Tidsramme: 2 weeks-1 month
Assessment of what patients did and did not like about the DA, ways they think the DA can be improved, and how they felt the DA affected communication with their physician.
2 weeks-1 month

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Shoshana Rosenberg, ScD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

19. februar 2016

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

10. april 2020

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

10. april 2020

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

20. december 2015

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

29. december 2015

Først opslået (Skøn)

31. december 2015

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

29. juni 2020

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

26. juni 2020

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2020

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 15-288
  • 1K01HS023680-01A1 (U.S.A. AHRQ bevilling/kontrakt)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

Ingen

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Brystkræft

Kliniske forsøg med qualitative data collection

Abonner