Safer Care for Older People in (Residential) Environments (SCOPE)
調査の概要
詳細な説明
The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a facilitation-based improvement intervention on three primary performance outcomes: (1) staff reported use of best practices, (2) measures of staff work engagement and job satisfaction, and (3) resident quality of care. Within the context of the Translating Research in Elder Care study (Pro00037937), the influence of staff characteristics related to work performance and unit context scores (leadership, culture, resources) on the three primary outcomes will be assessed Background Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) is an ongoing applied research program that began in 2007. TREC is focused on practical solutions that will improve quality of care provided to nursing home residents, enrich the work life of their caregivers, and enhance system efficiencies and effectiveness. In TREC 1, teams of researchers worked together with decision makers from the residential long term care (LTC) sector on multiple studies in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and to a lesser extent, British Columbia (SCOPE pilot only). Data were collected from approximately 4000 care providers and residents using the Resident Assessment Index Minimum data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 in participating TREC nursing homes.
TREC has already established its value to the health system by demonstrating improvements in resident care, clinical outcomes, and staff well-being. Information data collected from over 100,500 resident assessments combined with the staff and facility surveys now forms the TREC Measurement System (TMS Project). This wealth of data has informed the SCOPE pilot project in 2010 and SCOPE was conceived as a result of this data.
The SCOPE intervention is designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT). For our primary outcome measure (change in Conceptual Research Use (CRU)between pre and post intervention periods) a sample size of 34 units per arm is adequate to detect an effect size of 0.67 or greater (using the standard deviation for the change in CRU between pre and post intervention periods for intervention and non-intervention from the SCOPE pilot data at 80% power, with an alpha 0.05, for a 2-tailed comparison of independent samples. The intervention will take place in as many as 45 of the facilities involved in the TMS project (Pro00037937) to take account of drop -outs. Each facility will have a Senior Sponsor (generally the Director of Care or Exec Director). Participants in the intervention teams will be from a single unit in each intervention facility and will include 3 Health Care Aides who will lead the team, as well as 2 other members of that unit which can include other allied professional staff, nurses, and Occupational Therapist /Rec Aides. One member of the team must be the Team sponsor (generally the unit's care manager) removes obstacles for the team.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton、Alberta、カナダ、T6G 2P4
- University of Alberta
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
Facilities must be a part of TMS to be eligible for SCOPE. This means that they are:
- A nursing home or residential long term care facility which provides 24-hour on-site housing and health care services care for older adults by professional (nursing) staff and others
- Registered with the provincial government
- 90% of residents aged 65 or over
- RAI-MDS 2.0 implemented since January 2011
- Facility operations conducted in the English language
Urban* facilities located within designated health regions and within 110 km of the TREC-designated hub for the health region:
- Fraser Health Authority (Hub is New Westminster)
- Interior Health Authority (Hubs are Kelowna, Kamloops)
- Alberta (AHS): Edmonton and Calgary Zones (Edmonton & Calgary are hubs)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Facilities that have participated in the SCOPE pilot study (Pro00012517)
Facilities integrated with acute care. Defined as residential long-term care facility (usually one or more resident units) that:
- Are physically located within an acute care facility and
- Share central services (e.g., human resources, laundry), as well as, other functions integral to care delivery such as staffing, supervision, performance management, etc.)
- Co-located services (where the daily operations of the resident units are managed separately and staff independently) are acceptable
- Facilities with more than one sub-acute (e.g., orthopaedic rehab) unit
- Facilities with fewer than 35 long-term care beds
- Facilities which are expected to undergo major change within the next two years
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:トリプル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:modified IHI breakthrough series
The SCOPE intervention is a complex, "high facilitation", multi-component intervention operating at the microsystem (resident care unit) level of the organization and is designed to engage, develop, and equip Health Care Aides to implement improvement initiatives.
|
There are five main elements to the intervention:
5. The concluding session is an opportunity for networking, sharing successes and making plans for the continuation of project work following the end of formal support |
|
介入なし:Control
The control units (propensity matched) have no intervention and form a naturalistic control
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Conceptual Research Use
時間枠:1 year
|
Conceptual use of best practices: indirect measure of application of research and best practices measured by a 5 item scale.
BMC Health Services Research 2011; 11:107 demonstrating acceptable validity and reliability
|
1 year
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Resident Assessment Index -minimal Data Set (RAI-MDS) factors
時間枠:change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
|
Resident outcome data obtained from quarterly RAI-MDS 2.0 reports, examined as the change in the quality indicator worked upon (e.g., pressure ulcers, pain, declining behaviour) between baseline and study end
|
change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
|
|
Staff outcomes
時間枠:change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
|
Staff (healthcare aide) outcomes of work engagement, burnout, empowerment, organizational citizenship behaviours and job satisfaction.
We will assess baseline performance using the Rantz Observable Indicators of Quality survey
|
change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
|
協力者と研究者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- SCOPE ABBC
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。