Safer Care for Older People in (Residential) Environments (SCOPE)

The overall aim of the program is to advance knowledge translation science in order to improve clinical and staff related outcomes in long term care facilities (nursing homes) in western Canada. SCOPE will assess the effect of Care Aide led Quality Improvement efforts on staff quality of work life as well as resident quality of care. A key element of SCOPE is a leadership development stream which introduces complexity science and education on quality improvement which aims to support front line teams with their improvement initiative

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Nursing Homes
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: modified IHI breakthrough series

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a facilitation-based improvement intervention on three primary performance outcomes: (1) staff reported use of best practices, (2) measures of staff work engagement and job satisfaction, and (3) resident quality of care. Within the context of the Translating Research in Elder Care study (Pro00037937), the influence of staff characteristics related to work performance and unit context scores (leadership, culture, resources) on the three primary outcomes will be assessed Background Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) is an ongoing applied research program that began in 2007. TREC is focused on practical solutions that will improve quality of care provided to nursing home residents, enrich the work life of their caregivers, and enhance system efficiencies and effectiveness. In TREC 1, teams of researchers worked together with decision makers from the residential long term care (LTC) sector on multiple studies in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and to a lesser extent, British Columbia (SCOPE pilot only). Data were collected from approximately 4000 care providers and residents using the Resident Assessment Index Minimum data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 in participating TREC nursing homes.

TREC has already established its value to the health system by demonstrating improvements in resident care, clinical outcomes, and staff well-being. Information data collected from over 100,500 resident assessments combined with the staff and facility surveys now forms the TREC Measurement System (TMS Project). This wealth of data has informed the SCOPE pilot project in 2010 and SCOPE was conceived as a result of this data.

The SCOPE intervention is designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT). For our primary outcome measure (change in Conceptual Research Use (CRU)between pre and post intervention periods) a sample size of 34 units per arm is adequate to detect an effect size of 0.67 or greater (using the standard deviation for the change in CRU between pre and post intervention periods for intervention and non-intervention from the SCOPE pilot data at 80% power, with an alpha 0.05, for a 2-tailed comparison of independent samples. The intervention will take place in as many as 45 of the facilities involved in the TMS project (Pro00037937) to take account of drop -outs. Each facility will have a Senior Sponsor (generally the Director of Care or Exec Director). Participants in the intervention teams will be from a single unit in each intervention facility and will include 3 Health Care Aides who will lead the team, as well as 2 other members of that unit which can include other allied professional staff, nurses, and Occupational Therapist /Rec Aides. One member of the team must be the Team sponsor (generally the unit's care manager) removes obstacles for the team.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 32
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • Alberta
    • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2P4
      • University of Alberta

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Facilities must be a part of TMS to be eligible for SCOPE. This means that they are:

• A nursing home or residential long term care facility which provides 24-hour on-site housing and health care services care for older adults by professional (nursing) staff and others
• Registered with the provincial government
• 90% of residents aged 65 or over
• RAI-MDS 2.0 implemented since January 2011
• Facility operations conducted in the English language

• Urban* facilities located within designated health regions and within 110 km of the TREC-designated hub for the health region:

  • Fraser Health Authority (Hub is New Westminster)
  • Interior Health Authority (Hubs are Kelowna, Kamloops)
  • Alberta (AHS): Edmonton and Calgary Zones (Edmonton & Calgary are hubs)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Facilities that have participated in the SCOPE pilot study (Pro00012517)

• Facilities integrated with acute care. Defined as residential long-term care facility (usually one or more resident units) that:

  • Are physically located within an acute care facility and
  • Share central services (e.g., human resources, laundry), as well as, other functions integral to care delivery such as staffing, supervision, performance management, etc.)
  • Co-located services (where the daily operations of the resident units are managed separately and staff independently) are acceptable
• Facilities with more than one sub-acute (e.g., orthopaedic rehab) unit
• Facilities with fewer than 35 long-term care beds
• Facilities which are expected to undergo major change within the next two years

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Triple

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: modified IHI breakthrough series; The SCOPE intervention is a complex, "high facilitation", multi-component intervention operating at the microsystem (resident care unit) level of the organization and is designed to engage, develop, and equip Health Care Aides to implement improvement initiatives.	Other: modified IHI breakthrough series; There are five main elements to the intervention: Establishment of the team and set up; Establishing baseline performance and knowledge; Ongoing developmental support; Learning sessions (3); Action periods (3); The actual facilitative actions (e.g., coaching, guiding, mentoring, supporting) occur in combination with limited teaching, largely during telephone conferences but also in any visit, which may occur up to quarterly. 5. The concluding session is an opportunity for networking, sharing successes and making plans for the continuation of project work following the end of formal support
No Intervention: Control; The control units (propensity matched) have no intervention and form a naturalistic control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Conceptual Research Use	Conceptual use of best practices: indirect measure of application of research and best practices measured by a 5 item scale. BMC Health Services Research 2011; 11:107 demonstrating acceptable validity and reliability	1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Resident Assessment Index -minimal Data Set (RAI-MDS) factors	Resident outcome data obtained from quarterly RAI-MDS 2.0 reports, examined as the change in the quality indicator worked upon (e.g., pressure ulcers, pain, declining behaviour) between baseline and study end	change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
Staff outcomes	Staff (healthcare aide) outcomes of work engagement, burnout, empowerment, organizational citizenship behaviours and job satisfaction. We will assess baseline performance using the Rantz Observable Indicators of Quality survey	change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Alberta
• Collaborators: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 4, 2018
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 30, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): May 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 1, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 1, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): February 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 18, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 15, 2022
• Last Verified: April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: quality improvement
• Other Study ID Numbers: SCOPE ABBC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: the data will be made available on request according to TREC data sharing policies

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No