Safer Care for Older People in (Residential) Environments (SCOPE)
研究概览
详细说明
The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a facilitation-based improvement intervention on three primary performance outcomes: (1) staff reported use of best practices, (2) measures of staff work engagement and job satisfaction, and (3) resident quality of care. Within the context of the Translating Research in Elder Care study (Pro00037937), the influence of staff characteristics related to work performance and unit context scores (leadership, culture, resources) on the three primary outcomes will be assessed Background Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) is an ongoing applied research program that began in 2007. TREC is focused on practical solutions that will improve quality of care provided to nursing home residents, enrich the work life of their caregivers, and enhance system efficiencies and effectiveness. In TREC 1, teams of researchers worked together with decision makers from the residential long term care (LTC) sector on multiple studies in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and to a lesser extent, British Columbia (SCOPE pilot only). Data were collected from approximately 4000 care providers and residents using the Resident Assessment Index Minimum data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 in participating TREC nursing homes.
TREC has already established its value to the health system by demonstrating improvements in resident care, clinical outcomes, and staff well-being. Information data collected from over 100,500 resident assessments combined with the staff and facility surveys now forms the TREC Measurement System (TMS Project). This wealth of data has informed the SCOPE pilot project in 2010 and SCOPE was conceived as a result of this data.
The SCOPE intervention is designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT). For our primary outcome measure (change in Conceptual Research Use (CRU)between pre and post intervention periods) a sample size of 34 units per arm is adequate to detect an effect size of 0.67 or greater (using the standard deviation for the change in CRU between pre and post intervention periods for intervention and non-intervention from the SCOPE pilot data at 80% power, with an alpha 0.05, for a 2-tailed comparison of independent samples. The intervention will take place in as many as 45 of the facilities involved in the TMS project (Pro00037937) to take account of drop -outs. Each facility will have a Senior Sponsor (generally the Director of Care or Exec Director). Participants in the intervention teams will be from a single unit in each intervention facility and will include 3 Health Care Aides who will lead the team, as well as 2 other members of that unit which can include other allied professional staff, nurses, and Occupational Therapist /Rec Aides. One member of the team must be the Team sponsor (generally the unit's care manager) removes obstacles for the team.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton、Alberta、加拿大、T6G 2P4
- University of Alberta
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Facilities must be a part of TMS to be eligible for SCOPE. This means that they are:
- A nursing home or residential long term care facility which provides 24-hour on-site housing and health care services care for older adults by professional (nursing) staff and others
- Registered with the provincial government
- 90% of residents aged 65 or over
- RAI-MDS 2.0 implemented since January 2011
- Facility operations conducted in the English language
Urban* facilities located within designated health regions and within 110 km of the TREC-designated hub for the health region:
- Fraser Health Authority (Hub is New Westminster)
- Interior Health Authority (Hubs are Kelowna, Kamloops)
- Alberta (AHS): Edmonton and Calgary Zones (Edmonton & Calgary are hubs)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Facilities that have participated in the SCOPE pilot study (Pro00012517)
Facilities integrated with acute care. Defined as residential long-term care facility (usually one or more resident units) that:
- Are physically located within an acute care facility and
- Share central services (e.g., human resources, laundry), as well as, other functions integral to care delivery such as staffing, supervision, performance management, etc.)
- Co-located services (where the daily operations of the resident units are managed separately and staff independently) are acceptable
- Facilities with more than one sub-acute (e.g., orthopaedic rehab) unit
- Facilities with fewer than 35 long-term care beds
- Facilities which are expected to undergo major change within the next two years
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:卫生服务研究
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:三倍
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:modified IHI breakthrough series
The SCOPE intervention is a complex, "high facilitation", multi-component intervention operating at the microsystem (resident care unit) level of the organization and is designed to engage, develop, and equip Health Care Aides to implement improvement initiatives.
|
There are five main elements to the intervention:
5. The concluding session is an opportunity for networking, sharing successes and making plans for the continuation of project work following the end of formal support |
|
无干预:Control
The control units (propensity matched) have no intervention and form a naturalistic control
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Conceptual Research Use
大体时间:1 year
|
Conceptual use of best practices: indirect measure of application of research and best practices measured by a 5 item scale.
BMC Health Services Research 2011; 11:107 demonstrating acceptable validity and reliability
|
1 year
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Resident Assessment Index -minimal Data Set (RAI-MDS) factors
大体时间:change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
|
Resident outcome data obtained from quarterly RAI-MDS 2.0 reports, examined as the change in the quality indicator worked upon (e.g., pressure ulcers, pain, declining behaviour) between baseline and study end
|
change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
|
|
Staff outcomes
大体时间:change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
|
Staff (healthcare aide) outcomes of work engagement, burnout, empowerment, organizational citizenship behaviours and job satisfaction.
We will assess baseline performance using the Rantz Observable Indicators of Quality survey
|
change between intervention and control groups 1 year post intervention
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- SCOPE ABBC
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.
疗养院的临床试验
-
Kadriye Demir完全的