Creative Writing for Type 2 Diabetes Management (CrewD)
2018年9月18日 更新者：Associacao Protectora dos Diabeticos de Portugal
Close Reading and Creative Writing - CrewD Program. An Alternative Educational Method for Group Care Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes Management. A Randomized Trial
This study is related to the development of a new model of Group Care for patients with Diabetes - the CrewD Program, incorporating close reading and creative writing in group education.
A randomized trial was designed to evaluate this intervention.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
A structured educational model for type 2 diabetic patients using Group Care is currently being used in several institutions for help managing diabetes in these patients.
In this study, this model was adjusted by introducing literary texts and using narrative skills.
A randomized trial was designed to determine whether group dynamic strategies using narrative and reading produce the same positive outcomes as a conventional group approach.
A total of 49 patients with type 2 Diabetes were randomized to two different Group Care dynamics, one "control group", with a classical structured educational approach and another, "intervention group", with close reading and creative writing.
Evaluation included anthropometrical measures, A1c and questionnaires for psychological evaluation.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
49
段階
- 適用できない
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年～85年 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Only patients with type 2 diabetes of >1 year known duration, aged < 85 years were included in the intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that did not complete the four assessments.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：支持療法
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：CrewD Program approach
The aim was to increase education about the disease by using narrative skills through the CrewD Program. The sessions were conducted by two group leaders: a health professional and a literature professor manager of creative writing groups. Each session had a title, which parallels the classical structured educational approach (active comparator condition), which was known in advance by the subjects: a) Who I am in Diabetes?; b) Nutrition; c) The body where I live; d) Fears; e) Can attention change things?; and f) Roots. Team leaders directed a discussion of different texts used in the sessions with the participants focusing on their feelings and on how the texts relate to themselves and to their diabetes. Patients were encouraged to participate and freely express their opinion. |
The CrewD Program - Creative reading and writing in Diabetes Program - is a Diabetes self-management education and support program to help people with Diabetes coping with the disease.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Classical structured education
Each session was 90 minutes long, with a similar internal structure in all of them. Each session included the following topics: a) Chronic Disease; b) Nutrition; c) Exercise; d) Complications; e) Self-management; and f) Diabetic foot. The sessions were held in a large room, in which the seats were arranged in circle. Every session was chaired by two healthcare providers, who worked as group leaders. There was a different visual presentation in each session, with relevant theoretical information. A board with sheets of paper was available for use in the discussion along with brochures about the disease. Patients were encouraged to actively participate and take part in group-problem solving. Group leaders guided the discussion by asking questions and encouraging the discussion. |
The Classical educational approach consists in an educational method based on the presentation of relevant theoretical information to help people with Diabetes coping with the disease.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c levels at 6 months
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
Hemoglobin A1c is measured in mmol/mol units.
|
Up to 6 months
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in weight at 6 months
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
Weight is measured in Kg.
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline in fat mass at 6 months
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
Fat mass is measured in Kg/m2
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline in waist circumference at 6 months
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
Waist circumference is measured in cm
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline in self-reported quality of life at 6 months
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
The Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire (DQOL) is a self-report scale to assess quality of life.
This scale comprises 13 items that are grouped in 4 subscales: 1) satisfaction with treatment, 2) impact of treatment, 3) worry about the future effects of diabetes, and 4) worry about social/vocational issues.
A total score may be also computed from the sum of the 13 items.
Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life, ranging from 13 to 65.
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline in self-reported locus of control at 6 months
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
Locus of control is measured using the Diabetes Specific Locus of Control Scale (DLOC), which is a self-report scale directed to diabetes patients.
This scale comprises 13 items that are grouped in 3 subscales: 1) internal locus of control; 2) external locus of control; and 3) powerful other locus of control.
Higher scores reflect higher locus of control in each of these dimensions.
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline in self-reported empathy at 6 months
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
Empathy is measured using a questionnaire - Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE-R), which comprises 9 items.
Self-reported empathy levels are measured through a total score that is derived from the sum of the 9 items.
The total score range from 9 to 63, in which higher scores depict higher empathy levels.
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline in self-reported group satisfaction at 6 months
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
Group satisfaction is measured using a questionnaire - Group Satisfaction Scale (GSS).
The GSS assess 2 dimensions: 1) satisfaction with therapist subscale and 2) content/group process subscale.
A total score may be also computed from the sum of the 12 items that comprise this scale.
The scores range from 12 to 60, in which higher scores reflect higher satisfaction levels.
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline in self-reported health
時間枠：Up to 6 months
|
The 36-Item Short Form Survey is used to assess health perception.
This scale comprises 36 items that are divided in 8 dimensions: 1) vitality; 2) physical functioning; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) physical role functioning; 6) emotional role functioning; 7) social role functioning; and 8) mental health.
These subscales are transformed into a scale range from 0-100, in which lower scores indicate worse health perception.
|
Up to 6 months
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
捜査官
- スタディチェア：João Raposo, M.D.、Associação Protectora dos Diabéticos de Portugal
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Ingersoll GM, Marrero DG. A modified quality-of-life measure for youths: psychometric properties. Diabetes Educ. 1991 Mar-Apr;17(2):114-8. doi: 10.1177/014572179101700219.
- Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
- Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1159-71. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159.
- Funnell MM, Anderson RM. Patient empowerment: a look back, a look ahead. Diabetes Educ. 2003 May-Jun;29(3):454-8, 460, 462 passim. doi: 10.1177/014572170302900310. No abstract available.
- Chrvala CA, Sherr D, Lipman RD. Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the effect on glycemic control. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):926-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
- Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J, Cox CE, Duker P, Edwards L, Fisher EB, Hanson L, Kent D, Kolb L, McLaughlin S, Orzeck E, Piette JD, Rhinehart AS, Rothman R, Sklaroff S, Tomky D, Youssef G; 2012 Standards Revision Task Force. National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S144-53. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S144. No abstract available.
- Pennebaker JW. Putting stress into words: health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behav Res Ther. 1993 Jul;31(6):539-48. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90105-4.
- Trento M, Gamba S, Gentile L, Grassi G, Miselli V, Morone G, Passera P, Tonutti L, Tomalino M, Bondonio P, Cavallo F, Porta M; ROMEO Investigators. Rethink Organization to iMprove Education and Outcomes (ROMEO): a multicenter randomized trial of lifestyle intervention by group care to manage type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):745-7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2024. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
- Frattaroli J. Experimental disclosure and its moderators: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):823-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.823.
- Rosal MC, Ockene IS, Restrepo A, White MJ, Borg A, Olendzki B, Scavron J, Candib L, Welch G, Reed G. Randomized trial of a literacy-sensitive, culturally tailored diabetes self-management intervention for low-income latinos: latinos en control. Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):838-44. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1981. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
- Trento M, Tomelini M, Basile M, Borgo E, Passera P, Miselli V, Tomalino M, Cavallo F, Porta M. The locus of control in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes managed by individual and group care. Diabet Med. 2008 Jan;25(1):86-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02319.x.
- Charon R, Hermann N, Devlin MJ. Close Reading and Creative Writing in Clinical Education: Teaching Attention, Representation, and Affiliation. Acad Med. 2016 Mar;91(3):345-50. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000827.
- Hojat M, Gonnella J, Mangione S, Nasca T, Magee M. (2003). Physician empathy in medical education and practice: experience with The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. Seminars in Integrative Medicine 2003; 1(1): 25-41.
- Ferraro LA, Price JH, Desmond SM, Roberts SM. Development of a diabetes locus of control scale. Psychol Rep. 1987 Dec;61(3):763-70. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1987.61.3.763. No abstract available.
- Marshall LE, Serran G, Cameron C. The Group Satisfaction Scale. Rockwood Psychological Services & Royal Ottawa Health Care Group - STU 2010.
- Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, Haas LB, Hosey GM, Jensen B, Maryniuk M, Peyrot M, Piette JD, Reader D, Siminerio LM, Weinger K, Weiss MA. National Standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-96. doi: 10.2337/dc11-S089. No abstract available.
- Trento M, Passera P, Borgo E, Tomalino M, Bajardi M, Cavallo F, Porta M. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving ability, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed by group care. Diabetes Care. 2004 Mar;27(3):670-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.670.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2017年1月5日
一次修了 (実際)
2017年9月30日
研究の完了 (実際)
2017年9月30日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2018年9月10日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2018年9月18日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2018年9月20日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2018年9月20日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2018年9月18日
最終確認日
2018年9月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。