Impact of an Optimized Communication on the Readmission for Adverse Drug Event (URGEIM)
Evaluation of the Impact of an Optimized Communication Between Hospital and Community on the Readmission at the Emergency Department for an Adverse Drug Event : Randomized Controlled Trial
Emergency departments (EDs) are a crucial element of health care systems as they constitute the interface between hospital and communities. The goals of the ED are to make an initial diagnosis and deliver urgent and critical care 24 hours per day and 365 days a year. Also, many Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) are not identified by emergency physicians. ADEs are injuries resulting from a drug related medical intervention. Their detection, documentation and reporting are essential for adequate medical care and knowledge of risk/benefit profiles of medication throughout their lifecycle. However, a number of studies indicate that in clinical practice the under-reporting of ADEs is a pervasive and widespread problem. The main reasons for under-reporting were difficulty in determining the cause of the ADE, lack of time, poor integration of ADE-reporting systems and uncertainty about reporting procedures. Successful treatment of ADEs depends on the ability of physicians to attribute ADEs to a medication. Some studies have reported that not only pharmacists but also pharmacy student were one of the best health care providers to establish medication history and detected ADEs.
It has also been shown that a clinical pharmacist, within the emergency medical team, can improve the detection of ADE through drug expertise and reliable drug history. This approach has been adopted at Montpellier University Hospital since November 2011. During the initial diagnosis of the ADE, the revision of a drug treatment at risk cannot be carried out in emergency department by the emergency physician. Indeed, the latter intervenes punctually but he is not the patient's referring doctor. Guidance and follow-up of the patient throughout the care journey is the responsibility of the referring physician, sometimes accompanied by the pharmacist. It is therefore very important that a relevant information detected at the hospital can be passed on to the referring health professionals who will review and adapt the treatment. The city-hospital link is essential to guarantee the continuity and the consistence of the care process. When a patient is discharging with the emergency department, the outgoing mail often mentions only the reason for admission, and the information concerning the detection or suspicion of an ADE is not systematically stipulated. However, this information is essential to trigger a process of therapeutic revision (therapeutic modification, therapeutic education, referral to specialized consultations ...) that will prevent the recurrence of the ADE and therefore the readmission to emergency department. To date, the rate of readmission to emergency department after a first visit related to an ADE is between 3.6 and 18.7%.
Our goal is to evaluate the impact at 6 months of a medical-pharmaceutical follow-up and the optimization of the city-hospital link following an admission at emergency department for ADE, on the readmission to emergency department for the same ADE.
This is a single-center randomized, controlled, open-label, two-arm, parallel, "usual information transmission" or "optimized information transmission" study. The duration of a patient's follow-up is 6 months.
Each patient with an occurring ADE detected during emergency department admission could be participating in the study.
Specific management of the experimental group: Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment). Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE. In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them. The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...)
Control group: The emergency department sends to the referring doctor a letter to inform him about the reason of consultations in the emergency department (mail currently realized as part of the care process).
Primary outcome measure: Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission for the same reason in the emergency department within 6 months of the initial exit. This information will be collected during a telephone call with the patient and the referring physician.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Herault
-
Montpellier、Herault、フランス、34295
- University hospital of Montpellier
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion criteria:
- Patient over 18 years old
- Patient to whom an ADE is detected
- Possibility of carrying out a pharmaceutical consultation/interview
- Patient who has consented to participate
- Patient affiliated to the social welfare policy
- Patient who declared a referent medical doctor
Exclusion criteria:
- ADE linked to an emergency care activity
- Voluntary medical intoxication
- Impossibility of recovering the patient's drug history
- Under 18
- Pregnancy
- Participating in another category 1 interventional drug study
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
介入なし:Usual information transmission after ED admission
The emergency department (ED) sends to the referring doctor a letter to inform him about the reason of consultations in the emergency department (mail currently realized as part of the care process).
|
|
|
実験的:Optimized information transmission after ED admission
Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment).
Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE.
In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them.
The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...).
|
Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment).
Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE.
In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them.
The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...).
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission in the emergency department for the same reason
時間枠:within 6 month of the initial visit
|
within 6 month of the initial visit
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission in the emergency department for any reason
時間枠:within 6 month of the initial visit
|
within 6 month of the initial visit
|
|
Percentage of patients hospitalized for ADE at least once
時間枠:within 6 month of the initial visit
|
within 6 month of the initial visit
|
|
Percentage of patients hospitalized for any reason at least once
時間枠:within 6 months of the initial visit
|
within 6 months of the initial visit
|
|
Potentially avoidable hospitalization rate
時間枠:6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Mortality rate related to ADE and all other causes
時間枠:6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Number of medical consultations with a general community practitioner in connection with ADE and all causes combined
時間枠:6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Number of medical consultations with a specialist community practitioner in connection with ADE and all causes combined
時間枠:6 months
|
6 months
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Maxime VILLIET, PharmD、University Hospital, Montpellier
出版物と役立つリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- UF7591
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。