Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Impact of an Optimized Communication on the Readmission for Adverse Drug Event (URGEIM)

4 mai 2022 mis à jour par: University Hospital, Montpellier

Evaluation of the Impact of an Optimized Communication Between Hospital and Community on the Readmission at the Emergency Department for an Adverse Drug Event : Randomized Controlled Trial

Emergency departments (EDs) are a crucial element of health care systems as they constitute the interface between hospital and communities. The goals of the ED are to make an initial diagnosis and deliver urgent and critical care 24 hours per day and 365 days a year. Also, many Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) are not identified by emergency physicians. ADEs are injuries resulting from a drug related medical intervention. Their detection, documentation and reporting are essential for adequate medical care and knowledge of risk/benefit profiles of medication throughout their lifecycle. However, a number of studies indicate that in clinical practice the under-reporting of ADEs is a pervasive and widespread problem. The main reasons for under-reporting were difficulty in determining the cause of the ADE, lack of time, poor integration of ADE-reporting systems and uncertainty about reporting procedures. Successful treatment of ADEs depends on the ability of physicians to attribute ADEs to a medication. Some studies have reported that not only pharmacists but also pharmacy student were one of the best health care providers to establish medication history and detected ADEs.

It has also been shown that a clinical pharmacist, within the emergency medical team, can improve the detection of ADE through drug expertise and reliable drug history. This approach has been adopted at Montpellier University Hospital since November 2011. During the initial diagnosis of the ADE, the revision of a drug treatment at risk cannot be carried out in emergency department by the emergency physician. Indeed, the latter intervenes punctually but he is not the patient's referring doctor. Guidance and follow-up of the patient throughout the care journey is the responsibility of the referring physician, sometimes accompanied by the pharmacist. It is therefore very important that a relevant information detected at the hospital can be passed on to the referring health professionals who will review and adapt the treatment. The city-hospital link is essential to guarantee the continuity and the consistence of the care process. When a patient is discharging with the emergency department, the outgoing mail often mentions only the reason for admission, and the information concerning the detection or suspicion of an ADE is not systematically stipulated. However, this information is essential to trigger a process of therapeutic revision (therapeutic modification, therapeutic education, referral to specialized consultations ...) that will prevent the recurrence of the ADE and therefore the readmission to emergency department. To date, the rate of readmission to emergency department after a first visit related to an ADE is between 3.6 and 18.7%.

Our goal is to evaluate the impact at 6 months of a medical-pharmaceutical follow-up and the optimization of the city-hospital link following an admission at emergency department for ADE, on the readmission to emergency department for the same ADE.

This is a single-center randomized, controlled, open-label, two-arm, parallel, "usual information transmission" or "optimized information transmission" study. The duration of a patient's follow-up is 6 months.

Each patient with an occurring ADE detected during emergency department admission could be participating in the study.

Specific management of the experimental group: Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment). Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE. In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them. The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...)

Control group: The emergency department sends to the referring doctor a letter to inform him about the reason of consultations in the emergency department (mail currently realized as part of the care process).

Primary outcome measure: Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission for the same reason in the emergency department within 6 months of the initial exit. This information will be collected during a telephone call with the patient and the referring physician.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

346

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Herault
      • Montpellier, Herault, France, 34295
        • University hospital of Montpellier

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 110 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patient over 18 years old
  • Patient to whom an ADE is detected
  • Possibility of carrying out a pharmaceutical consultation/interview
  • Patient who has consented to participate
  • Patient affiliated to the social welfare policy
  • Patient who declared a referent medical doctor

Exclusion criteria:

  • ADE linked to an emergency care activity
  • Voluntary medical intoxication
  • Impossibility of recovering the patient's drug history
  • Under 18
  • Pregnancy
  • Participating in another category 1 interventional drug study

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: Usual information transmission after ED admission
The emergency department (ED) sends to the referring doctor a letter to inform him about the reason of consultations in the emergency department (mail currently realized as part of the care process).
Expérimental: Optimized information transmission after ED admission
Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment). Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE. In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them. The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...).
Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment). Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE. In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them. The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...).

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission in the emergency department for the same reason
Délai: within 6 month of the initial visit
within 6 month of the initial visit

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission in the emergency department for any reason
Délai: within 6 month of the initial visit
within 6 month of the initial visit
Percentage of patients hospitalized for ADE at least once
Délai: within 6 month of the initial visit
within 6 month of the initial visit
Percentage of patients hospitalized for any reason at least once
Délai: within 6 months of the initial visit
within 6 months of the initial visit
Potentially avoidable hospitalization rate
Délai: 6 months
6 months
Mortality rate related to ADE and all other causes
Délai: 6 months
6 months
Number of medical consultations with a general community practitioner in connection with ADE and all causes combined
Délai: 6 months
6 months
Number of medical consultations with a specialist community practitioner in connection with ADE and all causes combined
Délai: 6 months
6 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Maxime VILLIET, PharmD, University Hospital, Montpellier

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

19 novembre 2018

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

19 juillet 2021

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

19 juillet 2021

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

29 octobre 2018

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 octobre 2018

Première publication (Réel)

30 octobre 2018

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

5 mai 2022

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

4 mai 2022

Dernière vérification

1 novembre 2021

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • UF7591

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner