Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Impact of an Optimized Communication on the Readmission for Adverse Drug Event (URGEIM)

4 mei 2022 bijgewerkt door: University Hospital, Montpellier

Evaluation of the Impact of an Optimized Communication Between Hospital and Community on the Readmission at the Emergency Department for an Adverse Drug Event : Randomized Controlled Trial

Emergency departments (EDs) are a crucial element of health care systems as they constitute the interface between hospital and communities. The goals of the ED are to make an initial diagnosis and deliver urgent and critical care 24 hours per day and 365 days a year. Also, many Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) are not identified by emergency physicians. ADEs are injuries resulting from a drug related medical intervention. Their detection, documentation and reporting are essential for adequate medical care and knowledge of risk/benefit profiles of medication throughout their lifecycle. However, a number of studies indicate that in clinical practice the under-reporting of ADEs is a pervasive and widespread problem. The main reasons for under-reporting were difficulty in determining the cause of the ADE, lack of time, poor integration of ADE-reporting systems and uncertainty about reporting procedures. Successful treatment of ADEs depends on the ability of physicians to attribute ADEs to a medication. Some studies have reported that not only pharmacists but also pharmacy student were one of the best health care providers to establish medication history and detected ADEs.

It has also been shown that a clinical pharmacist, within the emergency medical team, can improve the detection of ADE through drug expertise and reliable drug history. This approach has been adopted at Montpellier University Hospital since November 2011. During the initial diagnosis of the ADE, the revision of a drug treatment at risk cannot be carried out in emergency department by the emergency physician. Indeed, the latter intervenes punctually but he is not the patient's referring doctor. Guidance and follow-up of the patient throughout the care journey is the responsibility of the referring physician, sometimes accompanied by the pharmacist. It is therefore very important that a relevant information detected at the hospital can be passed on to the referring health professionals who will review and adapt the treatment. The city-hospital link is essential to guarantee the continuity and the consistence of the care process. When a patient is discharging with the emergency department, the outgoing mail often mentions only the reason for admission, and the information concerning the detection or suspicion of an ADE is not systematically stipulated. However, this information is essential to trigger a process of therapeutic revision (therapeutic modification, therapeutic education, referral to specialized consultations ...) that will prevent the recurrence of the ADE and therefore the readmission to emergency department. To date, the rate of readmission to emergency department after a first visit related to an ADE is between 3.6 and 18.7%.

Our goal is to evaluate the impact at 6 months of a medical-pharmaceutical follow-up and the optimization of the city-hospital link following an admission at emergency department for ADE, on the readmission to emergency department for the same ADE.

This is a single-center randomized, controlled, open-label, two-arm, parallel, "usual information transmission" or "optimized information transmission" study. The duration of a patient's follow-up is 6 months.

Each patient with an occurring ADE detected during emergency department admission could be participating in the study.

Specific management of the experimental group: Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment). Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE. In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them. The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...)

Control group: The emergency department sends to the referring doctor a letter to inform him about the reason of consultations in the emergency department (mail currently realized as part of the care process).

Primary outcome measure: Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission for the same reason in the emergency department within 6 months of the initial exit. This information will be collected during a telephone call with the patient and the referring physician.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

346

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Herault
      • Montpellier, Herault, Frankrijk, 34295
        • University hospital of Montpellier

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar tot 110 jaar (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patient over 18 years old
  • Patient to whom an ADE is detected
  • Possibility of carrying out a pharmaceutical consultation/interview
  • Patient who has consented to participate
  • Patient affiliated to the social welfare policy
  • Patient who declared a referent medical doctor

Exclusion criteria:

  • ADE linked to an emergency care activity
  • Voluntary medical intoxication
  • Impossibility of recovering the patient's drug history
  • Under 18
  • Pregnancy
  • Participating in another category 1 interventional drug study

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Geen tussenkomst: Usual information transmission after ED admission
The emergency department (ED) sends to the referring doctor a letter to inform him about the reason of consultations in the emergency department (mail currently realized as part of the care process).
Experimenteel: Optimized information transmission after ED admission
Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment). Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE. In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them. The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...).
Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment). Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE. In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them. The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...).

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Tijdsspanne
Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission in the emergency department for the same reason
Tijdsspanne: within 6 month of the initial visit
within 6 month of the initial visit

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Tijdsspanne
Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission in the emergency department for any reason
Tijdsspanne: within 6 month of the initial visit
within 6 month of the initial visit
Percentage of patients hospitalized for ADE at least once
Tijdsspanne: within 6 month of the initial visit
within 6 month of the initial visit
Percentage of patients hospitalized for any reason at least once
Tijdsspanne: within 6 months of the initial visit
within 6 months of the initial visit
Potentially avoidable hospitalization rate
Tijdsspanne: 6 months
6 months
Mortality rate related to ADE and all other causes
Tijdsspanne: 6 months
6 months
Number of medical consultations with a general community practitioner in connection with ADE and all causes combined
Tijdsspanne: 6 months
6 months
Number of medical consultations with a specialist community practitioner in connection with ADE and all causes combined
Tijdsspanne: 6 months
6 months

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Maxime VILLIET, PharmD, University Hospital, Montpellier

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

19 november 2018

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

19 juli 2021

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

19 juli 2021

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

29 oktober 2018

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

29 oktober 2018

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

30 oktober 2018

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

5 mei 2022

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

4 mei 2022

Laatst geverifieerd

1 november 2021

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • UF7591

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren