Pain Sensitivity Evaluation in Respiratory Patients
2020年3月3日 更新者:Marie Carmen Valenza、Universidad de Granada
Previous studies have reported that asthmatic or chronic pulmonary obstructive disease patients have an increased response to pain stimulus.
However, this aspect has not been evaluated in allergic patients.
Additionally, the difference in pain sensitivity between asymptomatic period crisis have not been evaluated yet.
調査の概要
研究の種類
観察的
入学 (予想される)
30
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年~65年 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
受講資格のある性別
全て
サンプリング方法
確率サンプル
調査対象母集団
Patients who were between 18 and 65 years of age, accepted to sign the informed consent and presented a diagnosis of persistent asthma, in a well-controlled phase, were recruited from the Pneumology Service of the "Complejo Hospitalario Universitario" (Granada).
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 18 and 65 years of age.
- Accepted to sign the informed consent.
- Diagnosis of asthma or allergy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment.
- Orthopedic pathologies limiting test performance.
- Active smokers.
- Neurologic pathologies limiting voluntary mobility.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
|---|
|
対照群
|
|
喘息患者
|
|
Allergic patients
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pressure pain threslhold
時間枠:Baseline
|
The pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) were evaluated by an analogic manual mechanical algometer.
This tool consisted of a circular platform with an area of 1 cm2 area, which was perpendicularly applied to generate progressive pressure on the skin at a 1 kg/sec rate.
The points selected were chose based on a previous study in asthma patients.
Patient was assessed in a seated position and pressure was applied two times at five bilateral points of the body: At two distal points, the distal thumb phalangeal and the gracilis muscle tendon at the inside of the knee.
Further at three points at the chest, the costae II, distal of the midst part of the clavicle, the supraspinous muscle and the trapezius muscle's second portion, between the angulus superior at scapulae and the vertebral column.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pressure pain threslhold
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
The pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) were evaluated by an analogic manual mechanical algometer.
This tool consisted of a circular platform with an area of 1 cm2 area, which was perpendicularly applied to generate progressive pressure on the skin at a 1 kg/sec rate.
The points selected were chose based on a previous study in asthma patients.
Patient was assessed in a seated position and pressure was applied two times at five bilateral points of the body: At two distal points, the distal thumb phalangeal and the gracilis muscle tendon at the inside of the knee.
Further at three points at the chest, the costae II, distal of the midst part of the clavicle, the supraspinous muscle and the trapezius muscle's second portion, between the angulus superior at scapulae and the vertebral column.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Borg scale
時間枠:Baseline
|
The Borg scale was used to assess the dyspnea, which is a comprehensive instrument designed to measure breathlessness in patients with respiratory pathology.
Patients rated their dyspnoea from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no dyspnoea" and 10 represents "maximum dyspnoea."
A difference of 0.9 units was considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), according to previous studies in patients with respiratory disease
|
Baseline
|
|
Leicester Cough Questionnaire
時間枠:Baseline
|
The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was used to evaluate cough.
This questionnaire brief, easy to administer and well-validated.
It consists of 19 items with scores ranging from 1 to 7 and it is divided in three subscales: physical, psychological, and social.
The minimum and maximum achievable LCQ total scores are 3 and 21, respectively.
A lower LCQ score signifies more cough
|
Baseline
|
|
Leicester Cough Questionnaire
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was used to evaluate cough.
This questionnaire brief, easy to administer and well-validated.
It consists of 19 items with scores ranging from 1 to 7 and it is divided in three subscales: physical, psychological, and social.
The minimum and maximum achievable LCQ total scores are 3 and 21, respectively.
A lower LCQ score signifies more cough
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
|
Borg scale
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
The Borg scale was used to assess the dyspnea, which is a comprehensive instrument designed to measure breathlessness in patients with respiratory pathology.
Patients rated their dyspnoea from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no dyspnoea" and 10 represents "maximum dyspnoea."
A difference of 0.9 units was considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), according to previous studies in patients with respiratory disease
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
|
Catastrophizing about Asthma Scale
時間枠:Baseline
|
In the Catastrophizing about Asthma Scale (CAS) patients rate the extent to which 24 items expressing catastrophic thoughts and feelings about asthma are applicable to themselves (e.g., "There is nothing I can do to reduce the intensity of the asthma attack", "I worry all the time about whether the asthma attack will end", "I feel I can't go on").
The scale has two subscales, one referring to the situation of an asthma exacerbation (the exacerbation scale; 13 items), the other scale referring to daily life, whenever no exacerbation is present (general scale; 11 items).
The CAS has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .93),
excellent test-retest reliability (r = .94),
and good construct validity.
|
Baseline
|
|
Catastrophizing about Asthma Scale
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
In the Catastrophizing about Asthma Scale (CAS) patients rate the extent to which 24 items expressing catastrophic thoughts and feelings about asthma are applicable to themselves (e.g., "There is nothing I can do to reduce the intensity of the asthma attack", "I worry all the time about whether the asthma attack will end", "I feel I can't go on").
The scale has two subscales, one referring to the situation of an asthma exacerbation (the exacerbation scale; 13 items), the other scale referring to daily life, whenever no exacerbation is present (general scale; 11 items).
The CAS has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .93),
excellent test-retest reliability (r = .94),
and good construct validity.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
|
Latency and summation
時間枠:Baseline
|
In each testing session two series of contacts of the mechanical probe with the flexor digitorum muscle (one at ISI 3 s and one at ISI 5 s) were presented to each forearm.
The forearms were always alternated between each series of contacts.
Ratings of both forearms were used to control for differences in hand dominance and sites of pain.
|
Baseline
|
|
Latency and summation
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
In each testing session two series of contacts of the mechanical probe with the flexor digitorum muscle (one at ISI 3 s and one at ISI 5 s) were presented to each forearm.
The forearms were always alternated between each series of contacts.
Ratings of both forearms were used to control for differences in hand dominance and sites of pain.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
|
Fatigue
時間枠:Baseline
|
Fatigue was measured by the Fatigue Severity Scale.
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to assess fatigue and is a 9-item scale, scored from 1 to 7, with the greater the number suggesting more severe fatigue.
|
Baseline
|
|
Fatigue
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
Fatigue was measured by the Fatigue Severity Scale.
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to assess fatigue and is a 9-item scale, scored from 1 to 7, with the greater the number suggesting more severe fatigue.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
|
Health status
時間枠:Baseline
|
The EQ-5D was used to evaluate self-perceived health status and is divided into two sections.
The first section contains five questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
For each question, problems within the domain are evaluated on a three-level basis.
Responders can choose between Bno problems^, Bsome problems^, or Bextreme problems^.
The second part is a VAS score, which records the responder's self-evaluated health, where 0 is the worst imaginable health and 100 is the best imaginable health.
|
Baseline
|
|
Health status
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
The EQ-5D was used to evaluate self-perceived health status and is divided into two sections.
The first section contains five questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
For each question, problems within the domain are evaluated on a three-level basis.
Responders can choose between Bno problems^, Bsome problems^, or Bextreme problems^.
The second part is a VAS score, which records the responder's self-evaluated health, where 0 is the worst imaginable health and 100 is the best imaginable health.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
|
Exercise capacity
時間枠:Baseline
|
The 6MWT is a useful measure of functional capacity, targeted at people with at least moderately severe impairment.
It has been widely used for measuring the response to therapeutic interventions for pulmonary and cardiac disease
|
Baseline
|
|
Exercise capacity
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
The 6MWT is a useful measure of functional capacity, targeted at people with at least moderately severe impairment.
It has been widely used for measuring the response to therapeutic interventions for pulmonary and cardiac disease
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
|
Kinesiophobia
時間枠:Baseline
|
Kinesiophobia was assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia which evaluate the fear of movement due to dyspnea.
|
Baseline
|
|
Kinesiophobia
時間枠:Up to 24 weeks
|
Kinesiophobia was assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia which evaluate the fear of movement due to dyspnea.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (予想される)
2020年2月24日
一次修了 (予想される)
2020年5月12日
研究の完了 (予想される)
2020年6月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2020年2月21日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2020年3月3日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2020年3月5日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2020年3月5日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2020年3月3日
最終確認日
2020年3月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。